Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
22 Apr 2020, 03:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
60% (01:33) correct
40%
(01:53)
wrong
based on 595
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Tires maybe either underinflated, overinflated, or neither. We are pretty safe in assuming that underinflation or overinflation of tires harms their tread. After all, no one has been able to show that these do not harm tire tread.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?
(A) The argument assumes what it attempting to demonstrate.
(B) The argument overlooks that what is not in principle susceptible to proof might be false.
(C) The argument fails to specify how it is that underinflation or overinflation harms tire tread.
(D) The argument rejects the possibility that what has not been proven is nevertheless true.
(E) The argument fails to precisely define the terms “underinflation” and “overinflation.”
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?
(A) The argument assumes what it attempting to demonstrate.
(B) The argument overlooks that what is not in principle susceptible to proof might be false.
(C) The argument fails to specify how it is that underinflation or overinflation harms tire tread.
(D) The argument rejects the possibility that what has not been proven is nevertheless true.
(E) The argument fails to precisely define the terms “underinflation” and “overinflation.”
cogitoergosum5
22 Apr 2020, 04:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
The answer is choice D
The argument assumes that no one has been able to prove that underinflated or overinflated tires do not harm the tread and hence that is the only possibility.
Posted from my mobile device
The argument assumes that no one has been able to prove that underinflated or overinflated tires do not harm the tread and hence that is the only possibility.
Posted from my mobile device
19 Jan 2026, 22:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
The argument rejects the possibility that what has not been proven is nevertheless true.
Basically the argument rejects the possibility that what has not been proven, i.e, underinflation or overinflation of tires do not harm their thread is true, that is it considers it false because it is not proven
Basically the argument rejects the possibility that what has not been proven, i.e, underinflation or overinflation of tires do not harm their thread is true, that is it considers it false because it is not proven
