nitishjain0109
PeachSnapple1In this Q, the reason why I selected C) was that yes, there was another fact- that the designs were INTRICATE
Quote:
Some who researched the crop circles were convinced that their intricacy and the fact that the plants seemed bent but not broken precluded a human creator
Furthermore, the last line, i.e., CONCLUSION states:
Quote:
Thus, it is clear that most, if not all, crop circles are indeed the work of humans.
Here, Seemingly the author does not DISPUTE the statement per say. He believes in some other reason than the previously stated opinion (IC - BF2). It would be in OPPOSITE DIRECTION at most, but to DISPUTE would be too extreme IMHO.
Please let me know if this understanding is correct
Bunuel Yeah no I agree with you my dude. At first I also tempted C. Here are some of my thoughts on your counter argument. I could be dead wrong, so feel free to rectify me.
First, I did not perceive 'their intricacy' as a fact, like you mentioned. Because I think intricacy of the crops is something that the researchers perceived. Therefore, intricacy should be rather an opinion. I can interest you in an analogy. Let's say you and I are to solve an average-level math problem. For the sake of the argument, let's just say I no sh*t about math while you are an expert. Here, I can argue that this math problem is very complicated and therefore it is a serious problem to me. However, let's say you have been working in the math field for your whole life, hence this problem is a cake to you, not a complicated one at all. So, I think that intricacy is a matter of individual opinion, like fine art. I am sure a fine piece of art in my eyes is ugly, just because I could not comprehend the meaning behind it.
Second, when you mentioned that the author proposed an alternative rather than disputed the argument. Well, I think it really depends on the situations. I can also give you an analogy here. Let's assume that I asked you what you ate this morning, and you said 'not cereal'. Do I therefore know that you ate egg, bacon, or even eat at all? Probably not, because the parameter is just too big. However, if I flipped a coin, and then asked you what side I landed. I also give you a hint that it's not head. Do you know what side I have? Of course, because there are only options - head or tail. Now let's go back to the argument. If you look at it, here we only have literally two options- either it is
'precluded a human creator' (here the argument namely points out two possible option which are supernatural events or alien) or
'indeed the work of human'. I think this it a fair argument, because the crops were made either by human or by not human, whether it may be a ghost or an alien. So, I would say that the author disputing is not too extreme. Usually extreme answers are a red flag in certain type of questions, such as assumption, but I don't think we can eliminate extreme questions whenever we see them. I learned it the hard way.
Again, please let me know if you disagree with me. I have been on this club for almost a year now, but I just started posting. In fact, this is like my fifth post ever, so forgive my grammar.