Argument:-
Last year poor performance
This year the of performance both team and James McGuel is better, still critics are voting against James McGuel.
Anything that provides more information about this year's performance being sub-optimal and not showing true potential, although better than last year's.
A. OldFort United has not been playing more matches this year- Playing more or less matches doesn't provide any context to judge the performances of both team and James McGuel- INCORRECT
B. Football critics are often wrong in their predictions- Challenging the premise- INCORRECT
C. OldFort United’s decision to hire Wayne Bruce has turned out well for the team as he is the leading scorer for the team this year- Is Wayne Bruce being considered as a replacement for James McGuel ?? solely on the basis of being the leading scorer this year. What about his last year's performance?? Didn't he perform poorly??- INCORRECT
D. Many critics have raised questions about the actual nationality of James McGuel, making it likely that he will be excluded from the World Championship squad for the country- The basis of judgement should not be nationality rather performance. If at all nationality be the reason, it should matter in world tournaments not in National tournaments- weak reasoning- INCORRECT
E. After last year’s poor showdown, OldFort United has been relegated from the premier league and is currently playing against weaker opponents- This provides the reason for this year's performance being considered sub-optimal because performing against weaker teams would not show your true potential- CORRECT