Last visit was: 13 Sep 2026, 08:11 It is currently 13 Sep 2026, 08:11
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,481
Own Kudos:
841,026
 [9]
Given Kudos: 111,490
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,481
Kudos: 841,026
 [9]
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 23 Jun 2025, 00:30
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:49) correct 32% (01:55) wrong based on 588 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from wheat and related grains, causes allergic reactions in some adults. Medical records indicate that the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years. Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of doctors specializing in nutrition in our country has not decreased over the past four years.

B. Adults who are allergic to gluten are no more likely than other adults to have allergies to other food ingredients.

C. Adults who have allergic reactions to gluten are not more likely to be see a doctor for treatment now than they were four years ago.

D. In our country, either more gluten has been introduced into foods artificially, or adults have eaten more food naturally containing gluten.

E. The percentage of the population in our country of adult age has not changed relative to four years ago.


­
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
User avatar
pavanhra
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2022
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 33
Kudos: 8
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 23 Jun 2025, 04:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option Choice A is the correct answer for this.

A States that no of doctors hasn't decreased over the past 4 years. If the number of doctors decreased then the percent of adults who have seen a doctor will go up. This is one of the strong assumptions. If this is negated then the conclusion will break that it is just due to decrease of doctors the % has gone up and not due to adults exposure or greater sensitivity
User avatar
Sparsh007
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2021
Last visit: 11 Sep 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Posts: 13
Kudos: 8
 [1]
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 23 Jun 2025, 06:08
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I Think option C should be the correct answer to this question
User avatar
Vibhatu
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2021
Last visit: 19 Jan 2026
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 187
Posts: 177
Kudos: 63
 [1]
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 23 Jun 2025, 06:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The number of doctors specializing in nutrition in our country has not decreased over the past four years.

B. Adults who are allergic to gluten are no more likely than other adults to have allergies to other food ingredients.

C. Adults who have allergic reactions to gluten are not more likely to be see a doctor for treatment now than they were four years ago.

D. In our country, either more gluten has been introduced into foods artificially, or adults have eaten more food naturally containing gluten.

E. The percentage of the population in our country of adult age has not changed relative to four years ago.
User avatar
Budhaditya_Saha
User avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2023
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 40
Kudos: 12
 [1]
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 23 Jun 2025, 08:23
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to me C should be the answer.
Option C very clearly holds the main pillar to the conclusion.
If C is considered false then the conclusion wont hold.
User avatar
AnujSingh0147
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2024
Last visit: 01 Feb 2026
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
17
 [2]
Given Kudos: 128
Location: India
Schools: HEC Sept '26 Wharton '26 IE
GPA: 6.5
Schools: HEC Sept '26 Wharton '26 IE
Posts: 38
Kudos: 17
 [2]
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 23 Jun 2025, 13:39
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I eliminated option A , B, and E. Whereas, i was confused in between options C and D at first but with the help of resources.
I conclude option C is the answer
"option C infers that the number of people (allergic to gluten) seeing doctor now does not change compared to the levels of 4 years ago" - so the sample size is same and now as more people shows positive medical record of allergic to gluten. Supports the conclusion of the argument.
Whereas, option D is just a restatement of the conclusion.
User avatar
ajain31
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2024
Last visit: 12 Sep 2026
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
57
Given Kudos: 71
Location: United Kingdom
Schools: Wharton '27 Stanford '27 HBS '27 CBS '27
GPA: 71%
Schools: Wharton '27 Stanford '27 HBS '27 CBS '27
Posts: 71
Kudos: 57
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 23 Jun 2025, 14:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I went for C, I kind of thought of thats the assumption even before i read it.
User avatar
5monthGMAT700a
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2025
Last visit: 11 Sep 2026
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 44
Location: Korea, Republic of
Schools: Sloan '27 (S) Wharton  '27 (S) Kellogg '27 (S) HBS '27 (S) Booth '27 (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V83 DI86
Schools: Sloan '27 (S) Wharton  '27 (S) Kellogg '27 (S) HBS '27 (S) Booth '27 (S)
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V83 DI86
Posts: 13
Kudos: 12
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 24 Jun 2025, 03:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I chose C, but I think E can be answer too.

Assumption means 'necessary condition', and we can find it by doing negation test.

(E) (negated) The percentage of the population in our country of adult age has changed relative to four years ago.

if above is true, the conclusion of the argument is weakened.

- the argument is saying [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- but, what if the total number of adult(=1. see a doctor for allergy + 2. the rest) has decreased while the number of adults who 1. see a doctor for allergy remain the same as 4 years ago?

- even though, It suffice the fact that [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- however, the conclusion [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.] can be wrong(=weakend) because there should be demographic cause for the percentage increase.

so, E can be answer too.
User avatar
Sparsh007
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2021
Last visit: 11 Sep 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Posts: 13
Kudos: 8
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 24 Jun 2025, 04:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E can not be the answer because we looking for percentage of people seeing the doctor.
lets say right now the pollution is 100 and 10 % people are seeing the doctor and 4 years later population rise up to 200 and now 20 people (which is again 10 % only) are seeing the doctor.

Hence overall option E is irrelevant as an answer choice

5monthGMAT700a
I chose C, but I think E can be answer too.

Assumption means 'necessary condition', and we can find it by doing negation test.

(E) (negated) The percentage of the population in our country of adult age has changed relative to four years ago.

if above is true, the conclusion of the argument is weakened.

- the argument is saying [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- but, what if the total number of adult(=1. see a doctor for allergy + 2. the rest) has decreased while the number of adults who 1. see a doctor for allergy remain the same as 4 years ago?

- even though, It suffice the fact that [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- however, the conclusion [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.] can be wrong(=weakend) because there should be demographic cause for the percentage increase.

so, E can be answer too.
Show more
User avatar
5monthGMAT700a
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2025
Last visit: 11 Sep 2026
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 44
Location: Korea, Republic of
Schools: Sloan '27 (S) Wharton  '27 (S) Kellogg '27 (S) HBS '27 (S) Booth '27 (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V83 DI86
Schools: Sloan '27 (S) Wharton  '27 (S) Kellogg '27 (S) HBS '27 (S) Booth '27 (S)
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V83 DI86
Posts: 13
Kudos: 12
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 24 Jun 2025, 04:53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How about the situation like this?

4 years agoCurrent
Total population100 50
- adult population 20 20
- adult who see a doctor for allergy 10 10

in this situation, [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.] (10% -> 20%)

but the proportion of the number of adult who see a doctor for allergy to the total number of adult remain as 50%

so we can't say it's because [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.]

However, in considering (E), table above shoud be changed like this

4 years agoCurrent
Total population100 50
- adult population 20 10
- adult who see a doctor for allergy 10 10

in this case, the proportion of the number of adult who see a doctor for allergy to the total number of adult rose to 100% from 50%

So we can say [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.]




Sparsh007
E can not be the answer because we looking for percentage of people seeing the doctor.
lets say right now the pollution is 100 and 10 % people are seeing the doctor and 4 years later population rise up to 200 and now 20 people (which is again 10 % only) are seeing the doctor.

Hence overall option E is irrelevant as an answer choice

5monthGMAT700a
I chose C, but I think E can be answer too.

Assumption means 'necessary condition', and we can find it by doing negation test.

(E) (negated) The percentage of the population in our country of adult age has changed relative to four years ago.

if above is true, the conclusion of the argument is weakened.

- the argument is saying [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- but, what if the total number of adult(=1. see a doctor for allergy + 2. the rest) has decreased while the number of adults who 1. see a doctor for allergy remain the same as 4 years ago?

- even though, It suffice the fact that [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- however, the conclusion [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.] can be wrong(=weakend) because there should be demographic cause for the percentage increase.

so, E can be answer too.
Show more
User avatar
avigoesforMBA
User avatar
Joined: 21 May 2024
Last visit: 24 May 2026
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
23
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Schools: Sloan (MIT)
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q79 V87 DI82
GMAT Focus 2: 665 Q82 V85 DI82
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Sloan (MIT)
GMAT Focus 2: 665 Q82 V85 DI82
Posts: 59
Kudos: 23
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 24 Jun 2025, 13:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The word play lies in - percentage of adults who have seen a doctor

So as per your table: % of Adults (20) who see a doctor (10) become 50% and remains same in the next year as well. But the question mentions that this percentage has changed.

E) talks about the adult population out of the total population which doesn't really matter since the aforementioned metric is what we are really focussing on
5monthGMAT700a
How about the situation like this?

4 years agoCurrent
Total population10050
- adult population2020
- adult who see a doctor for allergy1010

in this situation, [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.] (10% -> 20%)

but the proportion of the number of adult who see a doctor for allergy to the total number of adult remain as 50%

so we can't say it's because [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.]

However, in considering (E), table above shoud be changed like this

4 years agoCurrent
Total population10050
- adult population2010
- adult who see a doctor for allergy1010

in this case, the proportion of the number of adult who see a doctor for allergy to the total number of adult rose to 100% from 50%

So we can say [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.]




Sparsh007
E can not be the answer because we looking for percentage of people seeing the doctor.
lets say right now the pollution is 100 and 10 % people are seeing the doctor and 4 years later population rise up to 200 and now 20 people (which is again 10 % only) are seeing the doctor.

Hence overall option E is irrelevant as an answer choice

5monthGMAT700a
I chose C, but I think E can be answer too.

Assumption means 'necessary condition', and we can find it by doing negation test.

(E) (negated) The percentage of the population in our country of adult age has changed relative to four years ago.

if above is true, the conclusion of the argument is weakened.

- the argument is saying [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- but, what if the total number of adult(=1. see a doctor for allergy + 2. the rest) has decreased while the number of adults who 1. see a doctor for allergy remain the same as 4 years ago?

- even though, It suffice the fact that [the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years.]

- however, the conclusion [Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.] can be wrong(=weakend) because there should be demographic cause for the percentage increase.

so, E can be answer too.
Show more
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,481
Own Kudos:
841,026
Given Kudos: 111,490
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,481
Kudos: 841,026
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from 06 Jul 2025, 14:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Consuming gluten, a protein composite found in foods processed from wheat and related grains, causes allergic reactions in some adults. Medical records indicate that the percentage of adults in our country who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies has increased significantly in the last four years. Either our adults have been exposed to more glutens, or they have developed a greater sensitivity to them.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The number of doctors specializing in nutrition in our country has not decreased over the past four years.

B. Adults who are allergic to gluten are no more likely than other adults to have allergies to other food ingredients.

C. Adults who have allergic reactions to gluten are not more likely to be see a doctor for treatment now than they were four years ago.

D. In our country, either more gluten has been introduced into foods artificially, or adults have eaten more food naturally containing gluten.

E. The percentage of the population in our country of adult age has not changed relative to four years ago.
Show more

­

Official Explanation



Reading the question: we read the prompt and find a somewhat hasty argument. The first two statements are facts, while the last one is an opinion and is the conclusion. One weakness here is that the author has allowed for only two possibilities. There might be another possibility. And that makes us notice: we have a causal argument! So we will look for a different cause in the answer choices--for the increased percentage of adults who have seen a doctor for gluten allergies. Specifically, given the format of the answer choices, which one rules out a new cause for increased visits? That's our filter.

Applying the filter: (A), (B), and (E) all rule something out, but the things they rule out wouldn't cause more gluten visits. Choice (C) rules out something that would cause more gluten visits, so it looks correct.

Logical proof: Negating (C) proves it: if people with the allergy are more likely to go in, that could be a different reason than given in the conclusion and the argument would be weakened or broken. Meanwhile, choice (D) does not pass the negation test; it merely states a possibility.

The correct answer is (C).­
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7400 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
704 posts