Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0803:00 PM PDT
-04:00 PM PDT
15 Full-length GMAT FE mocks with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jun 0808:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Master the GMAT with expert live instruction, a personalized study plan, and real-time support. Includes 40 hours of online classes plus 6 months of access to the TTP GMAT OnDemand video course. Mon/Wed June 8, 2026 →August 12, 2026 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
Jun 0701:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..- Jun 10
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Scoring 715 on the GMAT Focus Edition requires more than just learning formulas, memorizing concepts, or solving hundreds of questions. In this episode, Nishant shares how he improved his GMAT preparation by focusing on application of concepts, and more. 
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
03 Jun 2026, 22:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
36% (01:49) correct
64%
(01:53)
wrong
based on 102
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Last year a record number of new manufacturing jobs were created. Will this year bring another record? Well, any new manufacturing job is created either within an existing company or by the start-up of a new company. Within existing firms, new jobs have been created this year at well below last year’s record pace. At the same time, there is considerable evidence that the number of new companies starting up will be no higher this year than it was last year, and there is no reason to think that the new companies starting up this year will create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups. So clearly, the number of new jobs created this year will fall short of last year’s record.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second presents an explicit assumption that has served as the basis for that claim.
B. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second is a claim that has been advanced in order to challenge the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a judgment advanced in support of that main conclusion.
D. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second presents a possible objection that the argument discounts.
E. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a possible objection to that claim.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second presents an explicit assumption that has served as the basis for that claim.
B. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second is a claim that has been advanced in order to challenge the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a judgment advanced in support of that main conclusion.
D. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second presents a possible objection that the argument discounts.
E. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a possible objection to that claim.
Every tricky question should trigger a follow up quiz.
Build that habit with
GMAT Club Forum Quiz →.
03 Jun 2026, 23:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
AbhishekP220108
Similar questions to practice from OGs:
- https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-year-a- ... 58433.html
- https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-year-a- ... 31032.html
- https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-year-a- ... 50260.html
- https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-year-a- ... 54303.html
- https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-year-a- ... 68517.html
05 Jun 2026, 05:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
Last year, a record number of new manufacturing jobs were created. Will this year bring another record? Well, any new manufacturing job is created either within an existing company or by the start-up of a new company. Within existing firms, new jobs have been created this year at well below last year’s record pace. At the same time, there is considerable evidence that the number of new companies starting up will be no higher this year than it was last year, and there is no reason to think that the new companies starting up this year will create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups. So clearly, the number of new jobs created this year will fall short of last year’s record.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
Key to getting a Boldface question correct is analyzing the passage before going to the answer choices.
Analysis of the passage:
Last year, a record number of new manufacturing jobs were created. - fact that provides context
Will this year bring another record? - question at issue
Well, any new manufacturing job is created either within an existing company or by the start-up of a new company. - fact that provides context
Within existing firms, new jobs have been created this year at well below last year’s record pace. - supporting premise
At the same time, there is considerable evidence that the number of new companies starting up will be no higher this year than it was last year - supporting premise
there is no reason to think that the new companies starting up this year will create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups - supporting premise (Notice that, while this sentence as a whole supports the conclusion, the author indicates disagreement with the boldfaced portion of this sentence by saying that "there is no reason to think" the boldfaced portion.)
So clearly, the number of new jobs created this year will fall short of last year’s record. - main conclusion/author's answer to the question at issue
The correct answer to this Boldface question will accurately describe the roles of the two boldfaced portions.
A. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second presents an explicit assumption that has served as the basis for that claim.
The first is not challenged by the argument but, rather, supports the main conclusion.
Also, the second boldfaced portion does not support the first. After all, the idea that companies will "create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups" does not support the claim that "new jobs have been created this year at well below last year’s record pace."
Eliminate.
B. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second is a claim that has been advanced in order to challenge the main conclusion of the argument.
The first is not challenged by the argument but, rather, supports the main conclusion.
Also, while the second is counter to the main conclusion, it's not accurate to say that it has been advanced specifically "in order to challenge the main conclusion."
Eliminate.
C. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a judgment advanced in support of that main conclusion.
The first part of this choice is accurate.
The second part of this choice is tricky because of the following.
The sentence in which the second boldfaced portion appears does support the main conclusion. However, the second boldfaced portion itself is something with which the author of the argument disagrees. After all, the author says, "there is no reason to think" the second boldfaced portion.
So, the second boldfaced portion does not support the main conclusion.
Eliminate.
D. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second presents a possible objection that the argument discounts.
This choice works perfectly.
The first boldfaced portion is a supporting premise.
Then, although the second boldfaced portion appears within a supporting premise, the author says that "there is no reason to think" the second boldfaced portion.
So, considering the second boldfaced portion carefully, we can see the following: The idea "the new companies starting up this year will create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups" is a possible objection to the conclusion "the number of new jobs created this year will fall short of last year’s record," and the author discounts the second boldfaced portion by saying "there is no reason to think" it.
Thus, this choice is correct.
Keep.
E. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a possible objection to that claim.
The first part of this choice is incorrect because the first boldfaced portion supports the main conclusion, not an opposing position.
The second part of this choice goes in the right direction since the second boldface portion is counter to the first, but the second isn't really an "objection" to the first since the second is about "new companies" while the first is about "existing firms."
Eliminate.
Correct answer: D
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
Key to getting a Boldface question correct is analyzing the passage before going to the answer choices.
Analysis of the passage:
Last year, a record number of new manufacturing jobs were created. - fact that provides context
Will this year bring another record? - question at issue
Well, any new manufacturing job is created either within an existing company or by the start-up of a new company. - fact that provides context
Within existing firms, new jobs have been created this year at well below last year’s record pace. - supporting premise
At the same time, there is considerable evidence that the number of new companies starting up will be no higher this year than it was last year - supporting premise
there is no reason to think that the new companies starting up this year will create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups - supporting premise (Notice that, while this sentence as a whole supports the conclusion, the author indicates disagreement with the boldfaced portion of this sentence by saying that "there is no reason to think" the boldfaced portion.)
So clearly, the number of new jobs created this year will fall short of last year’s record. - main conclusion/author's answer to the question at issue
The correct answer to this Boldface question will accurately describe the roles of the two boldfaced portions.
A. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second presents an explicit assumption that has served as the basis for that claim.
The first is not challenged by the argument but, rather, supports the main conclusion.
Also, the second boldfaced portion does not support the first. After all, the idea that companies will "create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups" does not support the claim that "new jobs have been created this year at well below last year’s record pace."
Eliminate.
B. The first is a claim that the argument challenges; the second is a claim that has been advanced in order to challenge the main conclusion of the argument.
The first is not challenged by the argument but, rather, supports the main conclusion.
Also, while the second is counter to the main conclusion, it's not accurate to say that it has been advanced specifically "in order to challenge the main conclusion."
Eliminate.
C. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a judgment advanced in support of that main conclusion.
The first part of this choice is accurate.
The second part of this choice is tricky because of the following.
The sentence in which the second boldfaced portion appears does support the main conclusion. However, the second boldfaced portion itself is something with which the author of the argument disagrees. After all, the author says, "there is no reason to think" the second boldfaced portion.
So, the second boldfaced portion does not support the main conclusion.
Eliminate.
D. The first provides evidence to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second presents a possible objection that the argument discounts.
This choice works perfectly.
The first boldfaced portion is a supporting premise.
Then, although the second boldfaced portion appears within a supporting premise, the author says that "there is no reason to think" the second boldfaced portion.
So, considering the second boldfaced portion carefully, we can see the following: The idea "the new companies starting up this year will create more jobs per company than did last year’s start-ups" is a possible objection to the conclusion "the number of new jobs created this year will fall short of last year’s record," and the author discounts the second boldfaced portion by saying "there is no reason to think" it.
Thus, this choice is correct.
Keep.
E. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a possible objection to that claim.
The first part of this choice is incorrect because the first boldfaced portion supports the main conclusion, not an opposing position.
The second part of this choice goes in the right direction since the second boldface portion is counter to the first, but the second isn't really an "objection" to the first since the second is about "new companies" while the first is about "existing firms."
Eliminate.
Correct answer: D
