This is a paradox questions
Ideal case -
NBG (new breed goat) - 2X units of milk/Goat - P1 net profit
TG (traditional goat) = X units of milk/Goat - P2 net profit
P1 > P2
reality
but found that P2 > P1
we need to explain why the net profit was less even when the units of milk one NBG produced is double the TG
OA - if TG = 2 NBG , the units produced would be same, as prices are same, the profit should have been the same not decrease, so eliminate
Option B - its talk about revenue, in ideal case, NBG should double the revenue meaning 2R, assuming that R is for the TG
if 30% of this goes to loan, then 70% of 2R is still greater than R, so eliminate
Option C - let the bonus be B, so total Revenue of TG would be R+xB (where x is number of farms), and Point C says, most of the NBG do not have such a huge herd, and cannot produce the threshold, so are not eligible for the bonus
it does resolve the paradox, that the additional bonus amount along with their standard revenue
i.e. R+xB > 2R+nB (considering x>n, and n could also be zero, where n is number of farms having NBG and meeting threshold)
so keep
Option D - well it says that TG lives double the time than a NBG lives, considering this, we can assume that instead of one goat a farmer would have to rely on two goats, Revenue will be affected by 2R - CG (charge of one goat), but this doesn't tell if 2R - CG < or > R, so keep
Option E - let the Supplement feed be S, given S > R [as additional revenue = 2R - R]
so total revenue from NBG = 2R - S < R and TG = R, this will clearly show that NGB always will have lower revenue than TG
so Keep
of options C, D, and E
we are always sure that in E, the profit of NBG is less than TG
whereas with C and D, we are uncertain, it can either increase, decrease or remain the same
so final answer E