Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 04:07 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 04:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
alphonsa
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Last visit: 25 Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
1,065
 [56]
Given Kudos: 197
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
52
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
LighthousePrep
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Last visit: 28 Jan 2015
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
367
 [6]
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 110
Kudos: 367
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
bankerboy30
Joined: 27 May 2014
Last visit: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
46
 [3]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 71
Kudos: 46
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anyone have a solution for why the min is 2?
avatar
bankerboy30
Joined: 27 May 2014
Last visit: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 71
Kudos: 46
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Any quick way to derive the numbers of two subjects in common?
User avatar
LighthousePrep
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Last visit: 28 Jan 2015
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 110
Kudos: 367
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bankerboy30
Any quick way to derive the numbers of two subjects in common?

I try to avoid over formula-ing whenever possible. My approach to this problem was to identify the pattern.

So for the min, I started with a 0 in the middle and saw how the totals in each course and overall changed as I incremented upwards.

For the Max, I started with a 23 and incremented downwards.

Fortunately with this question, I found the answer very quickly. However, if the answer was further away, I would still have been able to guess it once I established the pattern of how the other course numbers had to change when I changed the middle number.
avatar
alphonsa
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Last visit: 25 Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Does anyone know if there is a better way of solving this problem :(

Besides how did you arrive at the final answer using the venn diagram?

For min, you seemed to have considered values for AB, BC and AC, whereas for max you ve used values for A,B,C :|

Please clarify? :cry:
avatar
sshrivats
Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Last visit: 15 Sep 2014
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
78
 [4]
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 40
Kudos: 78
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its easy to calculate that the minimum is 2. Obviously Venn diagrams make it simpler .. but if solving without it.

so above 75%

23 in math
28 in physics
31 in chemistry


to get at minimum, we have to try minimize the number of students who scored more than 75% in more than one subject.

So if 23 scored over 75% in math in a class of 40, then 17 students did not. Since we are trying to minimize the number of students who got 75% in more than one subject, lets take the case where all those who failed to get 75% in math got 75% in physics.. thats 17 students who got 75% in physics, but we know 28 scored above 75% in physics. So the remaining 11 should be people who scored 75% + in maths as well.


So there are minimum 11 people who scored above 75% in maths and physics.. --> 29 who have not scored 75% in math and physics. If we assume that all of these 29 scored 75% + in chemistry, 31 people scored 75% in chemistry.. so there are at least 2 people who scored 75 % in all subjects.

Hope that is clear.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The method i used was
Total no of students P union M union C (40) = P+M+C (82) - students with distinction in only 2 subjects(not 3) -2* students with overall distinction in all 3 (P intersection M intersection C)
This got me to
P inter M inter C = 21 - ½ students with distinction in 2 subjects.

So for max possible number tried with 0 students with 2 sub distinction, and it worked as i could reach sum total of 40 in venn diagram.
For min i could not keep the 2 subject students as 42 students, i could not keep it 40, as then the 3 subject intersection would be 1, making it 41 students total. So tried 38 , which worked and set in the venn diagram too, as 38 students with 2 subjects and 2 with all 3 and none with only 1 subject.
avatar
alphonsa
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Last visit: 25 Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
1,065
 [1]
Given Kudos: 197
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi thanks a lot :-D

Based on what you've said I've calculated what you've said, theoretically.

n(A U B U C) = A+B+C - n( Students who secured 75+ in exactly 1 subject) -2(ABC)
40= 23+28+31 - (T) - 2ABC
2ABC= 82-40 - T = 42-T
ABC = (42/2) -T/2 = 21-T/2

Now consider the minimum in the options given : 0,1,2

Plugging in ABC= 0
21- (T/2) = 0

T=42.However this is not possible because this exceeds the total number of students 40. (T is the a subset of 40)

Plugging 1
ABC=1 = (42-T)/2
42-T= 2
T= 40 . It is possible.

So then the Min number of Overall distinction= 1

Similarly for max we can plug in 22,21 and 23 from the answer choices.

(42-T)/2= 21 ; T= 0 (Possible)

(42-T)/2= 22 ; T= -ve (Not possible)

(42-T)/2= 23 ; T= -ve (Not possible)

So that leaves me with Max number= 21 and Minimum= 1

Now someone please tell me where I am going wrong :? :cry:
avatar
alphonsa
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Last visit: 25 Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LighthousePrep
bankerboy30
Anyone have a solution for why the min is 2?

This problem makes a lot more sense if you draw it out using venn diagrams.

Take a look at the attached image and see if that helps.



Hi
I understood how you got the 9, 12 and 17 in the 2nd venn diagram

But can you explain the first venn dia
avatar
alphonsa
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Last visit: 25 Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
navkaran
alphonsa
Hi thanks a lot :-D

Based on what you've said I've calculated what you've said, theoretically.

n(A U B U C) = A+B+C - n( Students who secured 75+ in exactly 1 subject) -2(ABC)
40= 23+28+31 - (T) - 2ABC
2ABC= 82-40 - T = 42-T
ABC = (42/2) -T/2 = 21-T/2

Now consider the minimum in the options given : 0,1,2

Plugging in ABC= 0
21- (T/2) = 0

T=42.However this is not possible because this exceeds the total number of students 40. (T is the a subset of 40)

Plugging 1
ABC=1 = (42-T)/2
42-T= 2
T= 40 . It is possible.

So then the Min number of Overall distinction= 1

Similarly for max we can plug in 22,21 and 23 from the answer choices.

(42-T)/2= 21 ; T= 0 (Possible)

(42-T)/2= 22 ; T= -ve (Not possible)

(42-T)/2= 23 ; T= -ve (Not possible)

So that leaves me with Max number= 21 and Minimum= 1

Now someone please tell me where I am going wrong :? :cry:

n(A U B U C) = A+B+C - n( Students who secured 75+ in exactly 2 subjects) -2(ABC)
Let T be students securing 75% in exactly 2 subjects.
40= 23+28+31 - (T) - 2ABC
2ABC= 82-40 - T = 42-T
ABC = (42/2) -T/2 = 21-T/2

For your minimum doubt:
Putting 0 makes it 42 which is more than total no of students.
Putting 1, makes T= 40 students, making total students=1+40=41, which again goes beyond total no of students.
Putting 2 for ABC, we get T=38, which makes total = 2+38=40.



Thanks.. Got it now.. :-D
avatar
apnmmm
Joined: 10 Jul 2014
Last visit: 21 Sep 2015
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LighthousePrep
bankerboy30
Anyone have a solution for why the min is 2?

This problem makes a lot more sense if you draw it out using venn diagrams.

Take a look at the attached image and see if that helps.

Why can't the max be 23? Can anyone explain how this venn diagram arrived at 21 ?
avatar
victormohanty2019
Joined: 12 Feb 2018
Last visit: 15 Aug 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 3
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Assume
A = Number of Students who scored 75% in only 1 subject
B = Number of Students who scored 75% in 2 subjects
C = Number of Students who scored 75% in 3 subjects

A+B+C = 40 (Total number of students)
A+2B+3C = 23+28+31 = 82
Solving these 2 :
B+2C = 42 & C-A = 2
To find minimum students: Apply A=0 => C=2
To find Maximum: Apply B=0 => C=42/2=21
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,331
Own Kudos:
772
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,331
Kudos: 772
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let

A = no of people who have exactly 1

B = no of people who have exactly 2

C = no of people who have exactly 3

We can set up 2 equations:


A + B + C = 40

1(A) + 2(B) + 3(C) = (23 + 28 + 31) = 82


Maximize C

Step 1: solve by subtracting the 2equations

A + 2B + 3C = 82
- ( A + B + C = 40)
____________
B + 2C = 42

“surplus” of 42——-each person who gets two will account for +1 of this surplus and each person who gets all three (and a commendation) will account for +2 of this surplus

To maximize the no. of people who are part of all 3 sets, we should minimize the no. of people part of 2 sets (i.e., minimize B)

Let B = 0 ———> 0 + 2C = 42 ——-> C = 21

If C = 21, can both of the original equations be satisfied?

A + B + 21 = 40
A + 2B + (3)(21) = 82
————————
A + B = 19
A + 2B = 82 - 63 = 19

We can have 19 people get exactly 1 pass and have 21 get all 3 passes and the commendation

21 is the Maximum Value of C


Minimum

A + B + C = 40

To minimize the no. of ppl who pass all three (C) ———> we should Maximize the no. of ppl who pass exactly two (B)———-> for which we should Minimize the no. of ppl who pass exactly one (A)

Case 1: let’s try A = 0

0 + B + C = 40
0 + 2B + 3C = 82
———————

To solve for both equations through combination, multiply the 1st equation by *(-2) on each side and then Add the two equations

2B + 3C = 82
+ (-2B - 2C = 80)
_____________

C = 2 = Minimum no. of people part of all three sets

Does C = 2 and A = 0 satisfy our equations?

40 = 0 + B + 2 ————> B = 38 ppl who pass Exactly Two

82 = 0 + 2B + (3)(2)
76 = 2B ———> B = 38 ppl who pass exactly two

Works!

Answer:

Max = 21
Min = 2

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AVMachine
Joined: 03 May 2024
Last visit: 26 Mar 2026
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 190
Kudos: 154
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
12+17=29;
now from last 31 we can have 29 without three overlapping
so min 2
Attachments

File comment: Overlapping
Screenshot 2025-01-06 182534.png
Screenshot 2025-01-06 182534.png [ 36.44 KiB | Viewed 1147 times ]

Moderators:
Math Expert
109822 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts