Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 20:30 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 20:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,472
Own Kudos:
5,640
 [16]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,472
Kudos: 5,640
 [16]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
44,995
 [4]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 44,995
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kill3rlook5
Joined: 14 Dec 2016
Last visit: 24 Apr 2019
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 158
Status:Searching for something I've been searching..LOL
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Operations
Schools: Ross '20
GMAT 1: 590 Q35 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE:Medicine and Health (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Schools: Ross '20
GMAT 1: 590 Q35 V42
Posts: 46
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,974
Own Kudos:
8,710
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,974
Kudos: 8,710
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
Jackson Consulting reduced headcount by laying off 20% of its employees. If the earnings of each of the remaining employees were the same before and after the layoffs, what is the maximum percentage by which the average earnings of the employees at the company could have increased from its level before the layoffs to its level after the layoffs?

(A) 15
(B) 16
(C) 20
(D) 25
(E) 40

We can assume that before the layoffs, Jackson Consulting (JC) has 10 employees and each is paid, on average, $100. Thus, the total payroll would be 10 x 100 = $1000. Since JC lays off 20% of its employees, it lays off 2 employees and we have 8 employees left. To maintain the total payroll of $1000, each of the 8 employees, on average, would be paid 1000/8 = $125.

We see that the average employee earnings of $125 after the layoffs is 25% more than the average employee earnings of $100 before the layoffs.

Answer: D
User avatar
MsInvBanker
Joined: 23 May 2018
Last visit: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 653
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: Pakistan
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
MartyMurray
Jackson Consulting reduced headcount by laying off 20% of its employees. If the earnings of each of the remaining employees were the same before and after the layoffs, what is the maximum percentage by which the average earnings of the employees at the company could have increased from its level before the layoffs to its level after the layoffs?

(A) 15
(B) 16
(C) 20
(D) 25
(E) 40

Source: Marty Murray

hi,
since we are looking to maximize the average with no change in earnings..
Let all the layed off employees were ding Social service :wink: that is they were working without any pay..

so if all 100%,say 100 earlier were earning 100 with average = 1..
Now 80% are earning 100 so average = 100/80 = 1.25..
increase = 1.25-1= .25
% = .25/1*100 = 25%
D

That's exactly how I did it. As in total earning is 100 and the people working for it are 80.
User avatar
luisdicampo
Joined: 10 Feb 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 328
Products:
Posts: 480
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deconstructing the Question

The company lays off \(20\%\) of employees, so \(80\%\) remain.

The earnings of the remaining employees do not change.

To maximize the increase in average earnings, we assume the laid-off employees had the lowest possible earnings.

Step-by-step

Let the initial number of employees be \(N\) and total earnings be \(S\).

Initial average is

\(\frac{S}{N}\)

After layoffs, the number of employees is

\(0.8N\)

To maximize the average, assume the laid-off employees contributed no earnings, so total earnings remain

\(S\)

New average is

\(\frac{S}{0.8N} = \frac{1}{0.8} \cdot \frac{S}{N} = 1.25 \cdot \frac{S}{N}\)

Thus the average increases by

\(25\%\)

Answer: D
User avatar
pappal
Joined: 24 Nov 2022
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 314
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 94
Products:
Posts: 314
Kudos: 109
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
let no of employees and average earning per employee be e and a respectively (before layoff).
after 20% layoff no. of employees=0.8e and let average earning be a1.
as given total earnings remained same.
so a*e=0.8e*a1
a1/a=10/8
subtracting 1 from both sides
(a1-a)/a =2/8=1/4=25% is the increase in the average earnings
D
Moderators:
Math Expert
109754 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts