Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 00:12 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 00:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rohitgoel15
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Last visit: 29 Jan 2018
Posts: 184
Own Kudos:
3,250
 [142]
Given Kudos: 20
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
Posts: 184
Kudos: 3,250
 [142]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
131
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,763
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,763
Kudos: 810,709
 [69]
32
Kudos
Add Kudos
37
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
WholeLottaLove
Joined: 13 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
640
 [30]
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 301
Kudos: 640
 [30]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
gmatter0913
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Last visit: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
1,332
 [1]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 215
Kudos: 1,332
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vow! that is a very good solution :shock: It opened my eyes on how to read modulus based problems...
User avatar
rohitgoel15
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Last visit: 29 Jan 2018
Posts: 184
Own Kudos:
3,250
 [2]
Given Kudos: 20
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
Posts: 184
Kudos: 3,250
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
rohitgoel15
What is x?
(1) |x| < 2
(2) |x| = 3x – 2

Can anyone justify the OA?

What is x?

(1) |x| < 2 --> \(-2<x<2\). Not sufficient.

(2) |x| = 3x – 2 --> LHS is an absolute value, which is always non negative, hence RHS must also be non-negative: \(3x-2\geq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{\frac{2}{3}}\) --> \(x\) positive, so \(|x|=x\) --> \(x=3x-2\) --> \(x=1\). Sufficient

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunuel,

Thanks for reply .. But this is not clear to me.
Generally in modulus questions we do as below:
(1) |x| < 2
I agree with u. -2<x<2
(2) |x| = 3x – 2
In this case i did
a. x is positive so x = 3x - 2 , upon solving x = 1
a. x is negative so -x = 3x - 2 , upon solving x = 1/2

Why have you considered the bold part in this particular question. for eg. if |x| = 2 we always consider x = +2/-2.
I am confused ! :(
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,763
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,763
Kudos: 810,709
 [17]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rohitgoel15
Bunuel
rohitgoel15
What is x?
(1) |x| < 2
(2) |x| = 3x – 2

Can anyone justify the OA?

What is x?

(1) |x| < 2 --> \(-2<x<2\). Not sufficient.

(2) |x| = 3x – 2 --> LHS is an absolute value, which is always non negative, hence RHS must also be non-negative: \(3x-2\geq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{\frac{2}{3}}\) --> \(x\) positive, so \(|x|=x\) --> \(x=3x-2\) --> \(x=1\). Sufficient

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunuel,

Thanks for reply .. But this is not clear to me.
Generally in modulus questions we do as below:
(1) |x| < 2
I agree with u. -2<x<2
(2) |x| = 3x – 2
In this case i did
a. x is positive so x = 3x - 2 , upon solving x = 1
a. x is negative so -x = 3x - 2 , upon solving x = 1/2

Why have you considered the bold part in this particular question. for eg. if |x| = 2 we always consider x = +2/-2.
I am confused ! :(

Your way is more common, orthodox. Though you should discard x=1/2 as you get this value when considering x<0 and 1/2 is not less than 0. Also, if x=1/2 then 3x-2<0 and you get that |x|=negative, which is never true.

Next, the way I'm doing is based on the fact that absolute value is always non negative, thus 3x-2 which equals to some absolute value must also be non-negative: \(3x-2\geq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{\frac{2}{3}}\) --> \(x\) positive, so \(|x|=x\) and no need to consider \(|x|=-x\) --> \(x=3x-2\) --> \(x=1\).

Check Absolute Values chapter of Math Book for more: math-absolute-value-modulus-86462.html

Hope it helps.
User avatar
shasadou
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
3,176
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,475
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
Posts: 219
Kudos: 3,176
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA:

(1) INSUFFICIENT: This expression provides only a range of possible values for x.

(2) SUFFICIENT: Absolute value problems often -- but not always -- have multiple solutions because the expression within the absolute value bars can be either positive or negative even though the absolute value of the expression is always positive. For example, if we consider the equation |2 + x| = 3, we have to consider the possibility that 2 + x is already positive and the possibility that 2 + x is negative. If 2 + x is positive, then the equation is the same as 2 + x = 3 and x = 1. But if 2 + x is negative, then it must equal -3 (since |-3| = 3) and so 2 + x = -3 and x = -5.

So in the present case, in order to determine the possible solutions for x, it is necessary to solve for x under both possible conditions.

For the case where x > 0:

x = 3x – 2
-2x = -2
x = 1

When dealing with absolute values that contain variables, you should always check that the solution is valid. Plug x = 1 into the original equation.

|1| = 3(1) – 2
1 = 3 – 2

The equation is true, so the solution is valid.

For the case when x < 0:

x = -1(3x – 2) We multiply by -1 to make x equal a negative quantity.
x = 2 – 3x
4x = 2
x = 1/2

Once again, we need to test whether the solution is valid. Plug x = 1/2 into the original equation.

|1/2| = 3(1/2) – 2
1/2 = 3/2 – 2
1/2 = -1/2

This equation is not true, so x = 1/2 is actually not a valid solution. That means that there is only one solution to the equation. x = 1. The statement is sufficient.

The correct answer is B.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,389
 [3]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,389
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bull78
What is x?

(1) |x| < 2

(2) |x| = 3x – 2

We all know that if we have mods, we take two cases - positive and negative - and then solve the equation.
The point is - why do we do that?
If you remember, this is how we define mods

|x| = x if x is positive
and -x if x is negative

So basically, |x| takes different forms depending on whether x is positive or negative.
When I want to solve |x|=3x-2, I can't solve with |x|.

So I split it into two cases:
Case 1: x is positive
I get x = 3x - 2
x = 1
I accept this value of x since x has to be +ve and satisfy given equation. It does both.
Case 2: x is negative
-x = 3x - 2
x = 1/2
I reject this value since x should be negative for the equation to look like this.
So x can only take 1 value i.e. x = 1.

Remember, when you split |x| into two cases, you have to check that the value you get lies in the region in which you are expecting it to lie.
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,976
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,976
Kudos: 16,903
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
neverplayd
What is x?

(1) |x| < 2

(2) |x| = 3x – 2


Question : x = ?

Statement 1: |x| < 2
i.e. -2 < x < 2
NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 1: |x| = 3x – 2
i.e. x = 3x – 2 and -x = 3x – 2
i.e. x = 1 and x = 1/2
But 1/2 doesn't satisfy the given statement hence that is not acceptable. Therefore,
x=2 is the only acceptable solution

SUFFICIENT

Answer: Option B
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
20,000
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,000
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rohitgoel15
What is x?

(1) |x| < 2
(2) |x| = 3x – 2

Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Question

In the original condition, there is 1 variable \(x\) and 0 equation. So you need 1 equation.

Condition 1)
Since it is an inequality, there is no equation. Thus we can't identify the variable x and this is not sufficient.

Condition 2)
i) \(x \ge 0\)
\(|x| = 3x - 2\) is equivalent to \(x = 3x - 2\) or \(2x - 2 = 0\).
Thus we have \(x = 1\).
This is sufficient.

ii) \(x < 0\)
\(|x| = 3x - 2\) is equivalent to \(-x = 3x - 2\) or \(4x - 2 = 0\).
Thus we have \(x = 1/2\). However \(x = 1/2 > 0\).
There is no negative solution.

Therefore, we have a unique solution \(x = 1\).
This condition is sufficient.

The answer is B.

For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,447
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rohitgoel15
What is x?

(1) |x| < 2
(2) |x| = 3x – 2

Target question: What is the value of x?

Statement 1: |x| < 2
There are several values of x that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 (notice that < 2)
Case b: x = 0 (notice that |0| < 2)
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: |x| = 3x - 2
When solving equation involving ABSOLUTE VALUE, there are 3 steps:
1. Apply the rule that says: If |x| = k, then x = k and/or x = -k
2. Solve the resulting equations
3. Plug in the solutions to check for extraneous roots

So, first we get:
x = 3x - 2
Solve, to get x = 1
To check whether this is an extraneous, plug x = 1 into the original equation to get: |1| = 3(1) - 2
Simplify to get: |1| = 1
PERFECT, this solution checks out.

Next, we get:
x = -(3x - 2)
Solve, to get x = 1/2
To check whether this is an extraneous, plug x = 1/2 into the original equation to get: |1/2| = 3(1/2) - 2
Simplify to get: |1/2| = -1/2
This solution DOES NOT check out.

So, it MUST be the case that x = 1
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
davidbeckham
User avatar
Stanford School Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2019
Last visit: 11 Oct 2021
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 181
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 109
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
so |x|=x --> x=3x−2 --> x=1.

Bunuel, please can you explain this step? I am still not clear on how did you reach 1.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,763
Own Kudos:
810,709
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,763
Kudos: 810,709
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
davidbeckham
Quote:
so |x|=x --> x=3x−2 --> x=1.

Bunuel, please can you explain this step? I am still not clear on how did you reach 1.

x = 3x - 2
2 = 3x - x
2 = 2x
x = 1
User avatar
achloes
Joined: 16 Oct 2020
Last visit: 19 May 2025
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,382
GMAT 1: 460 Q28 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 610 Q39 V35
GMAT 4: 650 Q42 V38
GMAT 5: 720 Q48 V41
GMAT 5: 720 Q48 V41
Posts: 244
Kudos: 221
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This video does a great job clarifying the concept in discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYB2NrzA12o
User avatar
achloes
Joined: 16 Oct 2020
Last visit: 19 May 2025
Posts: 244
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,382
GMAT 1: 460 Q28 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 610 Q39 V35
GMAT 4: 650 Q42 V38
GMAT 5: 720 Q48 V41
GMAT 5: 720 Q48 V41
Posts: 244
Kudos: 221
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My takeaway:

For absolute value questions, plug in the positive case and negative case answers into the non-absolute value part of the original equation to make sure it doesn’t produce a negative solution. A negative solution is extraneous as absolute values are always non-negative
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,960
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,960
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109763 posts
498 posts
212 posts