I did it a slightly different way...
Using Combinations....
The probability of 2 random jurors from the entire juror pool is (6+w)!/[(2!)(6+w-2)!].
Looking at the first condition, (1) w≥3, just use 3 to represent women - 2 men have the greatest odds of selection with the fewest number of women. If the probability of selecting 2 men is
worse than the probability of 1 man and 1 woman when there are only 3 women, then selecting 2 men has even worse odds when we increase the number of women (e.g. w=4,5,6, etc.).
So, total combination of all in the juror pool is 9!/(2!*7!) = 9*8/2 = 36
The combination of 2 men is 6!/(4!*2!) = 6*5/2 = 15
The combination of 1 man and 1 woman is [6!/(5!*1!)]*[3!/(1!*2!)] = 6*3 = 18
2 men < 1 man, 1 woman
15/36 < 18/36
This answers as a
no to condition (1) and thus it's sufficient.
Using a similar logic to condition (1), we test the fewest possible number of women for condition (2), which is 1 (or 0...). We already know that having 3 women will mean that selecting 2 men has a smaller probability. Then, will the min. number of women still result in the same outcome (less chance for two men...)? If so, then it satisfies. If not, then two men have a greater probability of selection and condition (2) is insufficient.
The total combination of all in the juror pool is 7!/(2!*5!) = 7*6/2 = 21
Combination of 1 man and 1 women with only 1 female juror in the pool is [6!/(5!*1!)]*[1!] = 6*1 = 6
Combination of 2 men is 6!/(4!*2!) = 6*5/2 = 15
1 man, 1 woman < 2 men
6/21 < 15/21
So 2 men have a greater probability. We already know that 3 women in the juror pool means a greater probability for the 1 man, 1 woman probability, so this condition is insufficient.