Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 19:04 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 19:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,886
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,286
 [16]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sunaimshadmani
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Last visit: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
89
 [4]
Given Kudos: 51
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
Posts: 55
Kudos: 89
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AliciaSierra
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 736
Own Kudos:
648
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,350
Products:
Posts: 736
Kudos: 648
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MorningRunner
Joined: 22 May 2014
Last visit: 26 Nov 2017
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 286
Status:Manager to Damager!
Affiliations: MBA
Location: United States
Posts: 43
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the assumption that p^2 is positive is wrong..

p^2 can also be negative... The question stem doesn't say anything about p.
How can you take it for granted that p^2 is positive?

Dear Bunuel,
Could you please clarify~
avatar
tusharacc
Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Last visit: 01 Feb 2016
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Posts: 8
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
p^2 can also be negative...

navneetb --> p can be negative only if, p is a complex number, and even though inquestion it has not been specified whether p is real or imaginary. However, I think in gmat they always mean real number.
User avatar
MorningRunner
Joined: 22 May 2014
Last visit: 26 Nov 2017
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 286
Status:Manager to Damager!
Affiliations: MBA
Location: United States
Posts: 43
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tusharacc
p^2 can also be negative...

navneetb --> p can be negative only if, p is a complex number, and even though inquestion it has not been specified whether p is real or imaginary. However, I think in gmat they always mean real number.

Thanks for the reply.. :)

I agree that GMAT doesn't deal with imaginary numbers. I presume it is true when it comes to real calculations...
Somehow in case inequalities, according to my experience, I believe GMAT does allow squared numbers to be taken as negative.

I am not sure 100% though.

It will be great if some expert chips in here to confirm....
avatar
Ruchika2302
Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Last visit: 12 Apr 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This has to be 'A' .

Is q> t ?

Statement 1 : (1) qp^2 < tp^2

=> qp^2 - tp^2 <0
p^2 ( q -t ) < 0

Now , p^2 can never be negative ( GMAT does not deal with complex numbers ) , therefore, to satisfy the above equation ,

(q-t) has to be negative , i.e (q-t) < 0 ,

Therefore , q<t

a confirmed NO . Therefore sufficient statement .

Statement 2 : qp^3 > tp^3

qp^3 -tp^3 > 0
p^3 (q - t ) > 0

Now the above equation will hold when , p^3 and (q-t) are of same signs .

So if p is positive , then p^3 is positive , therefore (q-t) is positive , therefore q>t . ----> Yes ( q>t)

But if p is negative , then p^3 is negative , therefore (q-t) is negative , therefore q<t . -----> NO ( q <t )

Conflicting answers ( both yes and no ) , so the statement is not sufficient .

Therefore the answer is "A".
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
811,286
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,886
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,286
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
navneetb
I think the assumption that p^2 is positive is wrong..

p^2 can also be negative... The question stem doesn't say anything about p.
How can you take it for granted that p^2 is positive?

Dear Bunuel,
Could you please clarify~

On the GMAT the square of a number cannot be negative. It can be 0 or positive.
User avatar
camlan1990
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Last visit: 19 Sep 2016
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
270
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 95
Kudos: 270
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2
qp^2 < tp^2 => P is not 0 and q < t => Sufficient
(2) qp^3 > tp^3
qp^3 > tp^3 => p is not 0 and we have 2 cases

- Case1: p>0 => q>t
- Case2: p<0 => q<t
=> Insufficient

=> Chose A
User avatar
swanidhi
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Last visit: 14 Jul 2023
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
341
 [2]
Given Kudos: 137
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q41 V31
GMAT 1: 600 Q41 V31
Posts: 66
Kudos: 341
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities.



Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

Kudos for a correct solution.

Since this is an inequality, terms common(which could otherwise be cancelled, if non-zero) on both sides of the inequality cannot be 0 and hence can be cancelled.
1) qp^2 < tp^2 will always be q < p, because p^2 can never be negative, and in this case never be 0 as well (reason mentioned above). This answers the question. Sufficient!
2) qp^3 > tp^3. In this case, although p can never be 0, p^3 can definitely be both positive and negative. Thus the sign will flip. Insufficient!

Answer A
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,005
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.


Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3


-> In inequality, it is important to ignore square. That is, when it comes to multiplication in the other equation with 0, you need to ignore square. Thus, the question above is q > t ?.

In (1) qp^2-tp^2<0, (q-t)p^2<0, as q-t<0(p^2 is always positive number, even if you divide the both equations, the direction of the inequality sign is not changed. As q<t, it is (2) qp^3 > tp^3, (q-t)p^3>0, (q-t)p>0. So, the answer is A. In 1), it becomes no and is sufficient. Therefore, the answer is A.



-> For cases where we need 3 more equations, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
avatar
sankalp465
Joined: 13 Aug 2018
Last visit: 21 Feb 2022
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
what if statement 1 : p=1/2, q=-2 & t=-1 i.e qp^2<tp^2 => (-2)(1/4) <(-1)(1/4)
but if p=1, q=2 & t=3 i.e qp^2<tp^2 => (2)(1) <(3)(1)
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,886
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,286
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sankalp465
Bunuel
what if statement 1 : p=1/2, q=-2 & t=-1 i.e qp^2<tp^2 => (-2)(1/4) <(-1)(1/4)
but if p=1, q=2 & t=3 i.e qp^2<tp^2 => (2)(1) <(3)(1)

In both of your examples q is less than t. This is exactly what we get from (1): qp^2 < tp^2 is equivalent to q < t (after reducing by p^2), so we have a definite NO answer to the question.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,986
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,986
Kudos: 1,118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109830 posts
498 posts
212 posts