Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 03:02 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 03:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,772
Own Kudos:
810,727
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,772
Kudos: 810,727
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
1,508
 [2]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,889
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,089
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rye see, we don't actually have to solve this

we know A and B are eliminated, since A lacks information about Sports car and B lacks information about sedan.
Same with D, because A and B alone are not sufficient.

We are left with only 2 options C and E.
and as stated above its given that only 1/3 of Winchita population purchased sedan during 1985 to 1995. what if there were travelers in Winchita too? we have to determine the total no. of cars purchased in Winchita!
what if they shipped from there? there can be N reasons why a car can be purchased but we are only given the constraint of Winchita population. Which is not sufficient to determine the total no. of cars purchased in Winchita. we need a particular value to determine the purchased number of cars in Winchita.
Had it been A) 120 sedan is purchased in winchita and B) 100 Sports car were purchased in Winchita
then we would had choose option C. but since there is no particular we can't choose C.
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,628
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,628
Kudos: 5,190
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Were more new sports cars or new sedans purchased in Wichita during the years 1985 through 1995?

(1) In the years 1985 through 1995, one fourth of the population of Wichita purchased new sedans.
(2) In the years 1985 through 1995, one third of the population of Wichita purchased new sports cars.

target were new sports cars purchased > new sedans purchased

#1
In the years 1985 through 1995, one fourth of the population of Wichita purchased new sedans.
no info about new sports cars , how many were purchased ? and it can be possible that same people who bought new sedans also bough sports car
insufficient
#2
In the years 1985 through 1995, one third of the population of Wichita purchased new sports cars
again
no info about Sedans , how many were purchased ? and it can be possible that same people who bought bought sports car might have also bought sedans
insufficient
from 1 &2
we cannot conclusively determine whether new sports cars purchased > new sedans purchased
because :
1 . there is no info about population size
2. there can be possibility that same set of people might have purchased both cars as well
insufficient together
OPTION E
User avatar
gvij2017
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Last visit: 18 Jun 2024
Posts: 663
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 778
Posts: 663
Kudos: 508
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I may be wrong but I have different view for this problem.

So what the question stem is asking. Question stem wants to know which type of car purchased in Winchita is greater in number.

Now going ahead with st-1: (1) In the years 1985 through 1995, one fourth of the population of Wichita purchased new sedans.
1/4th of the population of winchita = Number of sedan cars.
At this point I don't know the number of sports cars.

St-2: (2) In the years 1985 through 1995, one third of the population of Wichita purchased new sports cars.
1/3rd of the population of winchita = Number of sports cars.
In this case I don't know the number of sedan cars.

Now club St1+St2
Two things are common in both statement.
1. Time frame.
2. The population of Winchita.

Considering this it is very clear that
1/4th of the population of Winchita < 1/3rd of the population of Winchita

Now go back again at Question stem. It wants the comparison of number of cars, not that of the number of population who purchased those cars.
Therefore, I chose C.

Please let me know if my understanding is deviating from correct.


yashikaaggarwal
rye see, we don't actually have to solve this

we know A and B are eliminated, since A lacks information about Sports car and B lacks information about sedan.
Same with D, because A and B alone are not sufficient.

We are left with only 2 options C and E.
and as stated above its given that only 1/3 of Winchita population purchased sedan during 1985 to 1995. what if there were travelers in Winchita too? we have to determine the total no. of cars purchased in Winchita!
what if they shipped from there? there can be N reasons why a car can be purchased but we are only given the constraint of Winchita population. Which is not sufficient to determine the total no. of cars purchased in Winchita. we need a particular value to determine the purchased number of cars in Winchita.
Had it been A) 120 sedan is purchased in winchita and B) 100 Sports car were purchased in Winchita
then we would had choose option C. but since there is no particular we can't choose C.
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,628
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,628
Kudos: 5,190
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gvij2017 you have not considered below case:

where there can be possibility that same set of people might have purchased both cars as well
insufficient together
moreover our target is to determine total cars i.e sports+ sedan ...

gvij2017
I may be wrong but I have different view for this problem.

So what the question stem is asking. Question stem wants to know which type of car purchased in Winchita is greater in number.

Now going ahead with st-1: (1) In the years 1985 through 1995, one fourth of the population of Wichita purchased new sedans.
1/4th of the population of winchita = Number of sedan cars.
At this point I don't know the number of sports cars.

St-2: (2) In the years 1985 through 1995, one third of the population of Wichita purchased new sports cars.
1/3rd of the population of winchita = Number of sports cars.
In this case I don't know the number of sedan cars.

Now club St1+St2
Two things are common in both statement.
1. Time frame.
2. The population of Winchita.

Considering this it is very clear that
1/4th of the population of Winchita < 1/3rd of the population of Winchita

Now go back again at Question stem. It wants the comparison of number of cars, not that of the number of population who purchased those cars.
Therefore, I chose C.

Please let me know if my understanding is deviating from correct.


yashikaaggarwal
rye see, we don't actually have to solve this

we know A and B are eliminated, since A lacks information about Sports car and B lacks information about sedan.
Same with D, because A and B alone are not sufficient.

We are left with only 2 options C and E.
and as stated above its given that only 1/3 of Winchita population purchased sedan during 1985 to 1995. what if there were travelers in Winchita too? we have to determine the total no. of cars purchased in Winchita!
what if they shipped from there? there can be N reasons why a car can be purchased but we are only given the constraint of Winchita population. Which is not sufficient to determine the total no. of cars purchased in Winchita. we need a particular value to determine the purchased number of cars in Winchita.
Had it been A) 120 sedan is purchased in winchita and B) 100 Sports car were purchased in Winchita
then we would had choose option C. but since there is no particular we can't choose C.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109766 posts
498 posts
212 posts