Let's denote:
Y = number of members who attend yoga sessions
S = number of members who attend strength training sessions
We need to determine whether Y > S.
Statement 1: Every member who attends yoga sessions also attends at least one other type of session.
This tells us that all yoga attendees also attend some other type of session, which could be strength training or something else. However, this doesn't tell us how many members attend yoga or strength training, so we can't determine whether Y > S.
Statement 1 alone is insufficient.
Statement 2: Every member who attends yoga sessions also attends strength training sessions.
This means that all yoga attendees are also strength training attendees. In other words, the set of yoga attendees is a subset of strength training attendees.
This can be represented as Y & S, which means Y s S.
Therefore, Y > S is false, unless Y = S (which would happen if every strength training attendee also attends yoga).
Since we don't know if Y = S or Y < S, we cannot definitively answer whether Y > S.
Statement 2 alone is insufficient.
Combining both statements:
From Statement 2, we know that all yoga attendees also attend strength training (Y C S).
From Statement 1, we know that all yoga attendees also attend at least one other type of session.
Since Statement 2 already accounts for yoga attendees attending strength training, Statement 1 doesn't add any new information that helps us determine whether Y > S.
Therefore, even with both statements combined, we cannot determine whether Y > S.
The answer is E Neither statement is sufficient, even when combined.