Hello,
nhatanh811. I am honored that you would seek my advice on these matters. You got close this time, but your timing, particularly in Verbal, will need to be addressed before you can make inroads on your target score. First off, you have invested in some fine resources, so I would not recommend anything additional in that department. There is no silver bullet to any section anyway; even the best resources are only as good as the person who knows how to utilize them. You will likely need to reread parts of different guides and see how the rules and suggestions are brought to bear in practice questions. My observations and suggestions are the following:
VERBAL:
RC—Surprisingly, you performed better on inference questions than on those with answers rooted directly in the text. As such, you should review questions you have missed and practice matching keywords between the passage and each answer choice. Watch for common traps such as overreaching language (e.g., cannot, must, always, never), vague or non-committal language (e.g., some), or reversals (the opposite of what the question is asking for, as in the wrong point of view on an issue). Do NOT look to justify the correct answer in review. Rather, you should aim to disprove the incorrect answers. If you can appreciate how a valid answer might veer off into invalid territory by adding an unwarranted word or two, then you will set yourself up for success in the future. As for timing, 2 minutes per question, on average, is fine.
CR—Well, your ESR shows that you aced Analysis/Critique questions while you floundered on Construction/Plan questions, so that gives you some insight into what you need to emphasize in your studies. It also appears as though CR was hampering you, in terms of timing. If you are going to sacrifice 40 seconds or so per CR question, on average, then you will have to balance that out somehow. Perhaps SC is the ticket, but if you are becoming more error-prone on SC questions just to make up time, then both areas will suffer. That CR Bible should come in handy for review.
SC—Go over those rules and conventions again, and do not be afraid to detach from the main sentence and jump straight into the answer choices once you
know something in the original sentence is incorrect. Sometimes grouping
incorrect answer choices and looking for differences between or among them can shed light on similar issues in more promising answer choices. For instance, yesterday during a session with a student, I noticed a 3/2 split at the head of the answer choices, and I preferred the 3; however, I examined the two less likely candidates to eliminate the worse of those two options. Guess what? A key split on subject-verb agreement popped up at the end of the underlined portion, and it allowed me to eliminate two of the three answer choices within the cluster that I had deemed more likely to be correct. Now, I was left with a 50/50 between a more likely and a less likely answer, and I spotted further issues in the latter, making my decision on this Hard question an easy one in the end. The process took under a minute. Remember, SC is not about what sounds the best, nor about expressing the ideas in the best possible way. Rather, SC involves sifting through five potential lines and knowing which ones to discard
for some grammatical or semantic reason, picking the best answer from those provided. Again, you will have to go back and spend some time reviewing past questions you have missed.
On the whole, you should be looking to get your accuracy on Medium questions up to 85 percent or greater. That should take care of any problems with the Verbal portion of the test. Turn that V45 in Practice Test 5 from an anomaly into the new norm.
QUANT:
You seem to have omitted your Quant resources, unless the courses you have taken have focused on it, at least in part. My advice would be not to assume that you will hit a 50-51, since you have done so just once in practice. To shore up any conceptual gaps, check out either the
All You Need for Quant thread or the
Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread. If you address your fundamental weaknesses topic by topic and practice high-quality questions to test your newfound knowledge (both the OG and the in-house Quant questions suffice to that end), then your timing will likely decrease in general. Sure, there might still be occasional questions that take too long, but you can mitigate your losses by cutting off such questions and getting on with the next challenge. Set a time target per cluster of questions: 5 in 10 minutes, 10 in 20 minutes, and so on, and if you fall behind in the middle somewhere (questions 11-25), allow yourself to make an educated guess once every few questions until you are back on track. If they are upper-level questions, getting a few wrong here or there will not affect your score as much as missing a string of questions at the end of the test. Your ESR tells me that you did indeed rush at the end. You will also have to practice DS questions more to come up with a viable method for solving them. I think that is about all I can extract from the Quant end of the ESR.
INTEGRATED REASONING:
Do not worry about it. A 6 is fine. (5 is really the cutoff between a noncompetitive score and an acceptable one, even at top-tier programs. The IR section just never gained traction.)
So there you have it. Again, I would emphasize review more on the Verbal side, understanding how incorrect answers are crafted, while on the Quant side, I would suggest studying more theory and practicing new questions.
I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask me about how to improve your score. Good luck.
- Andrew