Hello, I was lucky enough to get into both Kellogg (with $90k) and MIT Sloan (w/o $$) in Round 1 and I'd like to hear your thoughts on which school I should choose. I also applied to H/S/W but got dinged without interviews.
Profile: F/28/Asian/top LAC/boyfriend in Bay Area
Experience:
- 3 years as analyst in healthcare VC (Bay Area)
- 2 years as marketing manager/strategic planning manager at a $300-revenue biotech company, reporting to head of commercial operations (Bay Area and Shanghai)
Post-MBA goal: management consulting or product management/strategy in an innovative healthcare or technology company in Bay Area
Long-term career goal: starting my own company/going back to VC
My understanding is that the both schools are big on collaboration, are equal in ranking, and have almost equal alumni presence in Bay Area..
Kellogg:
pros: More well-rounded and esp. strong in general management (which opens door to almost any career options other than maybe finance), larger and closer alumni network, looks more fun, the $90k scholarship!
cons: weaker in finance (given my long-term goal to go back to investment)
MIT Sloan:
pros: stronger parent institution (more likely to meet potential business partners from engineering schools, for example), stronger in tech/biotech entrepreneurship, Boston!
cons: weaker in areas outside of tech entrepreneurship...weaker training on soft skills (that's just my initial impression but I could be totally wrong..)
I will visit both schools in February and would really appreciate your input in the meantime!
Happy New Year!!