all:
Thank you very much for your insights! I will not apply to Wharton and Sloan then.
As I am quite surprised - not in a negative way - about the 5:0 vote for Booth, I am wondering if I am missing something?
Hence, I was hoping I could spare my arguments "pro CBS" and my concerns about CBS with you.
Pro CBS:+ Stronger focus on Tech: Many tech firms have their second office in NYC (next to SFO); CBS has a reasonable amount of practical classes working with / visiting these firms; Columbia has a good computer science program with which I can cross-register, have joint classes and also use for recruiting, e.g., Columbia start-up fair (remember, I have a computer science degree)
+Chazen MBA Exchange: Columbia allows me to spend my 3rd semester at London Business School or Berkley. Depending if I like banking (summer internship), I could then build my network in Europe (London Business School) or focus more on tech and grow my network there through Berkley
+ Columbia has a stronger network and brand in Europe (/Asia).
My concerns about CBS: - they might not be the best indicators, still I am concerned
- Despite having the NYC advantage, a more restricted admission, a better brand .... Columbia does not manage to climb the ranks. Combining that with the felt perception here that CBS is inferior to Booth, I am worried that (a) a CBS MBA is perceived a MBA with a lower quality standard than a Booth MBA and that (b) the admits with several options prefer Booth, leading to a better student body.
- Network / Culture: I have the feeling based on my few interactions that Boothies really stick together and form very close bonds.
As always - thx!