Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 23:37 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 23:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Add a Tag
avatar
NobodyMan
Joined: 31 Mar 2017
Last visit: 11 Dec 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
Posts: 1
Kudos: 3
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,671
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,149
Kudos: 83,697
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
JohnnyBlaze
Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Last visit: 23 Jun 2023
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
71
 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
Posts: 101
Kudos: 71
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pinkflowers614
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jul 2020
Last visit: 21 Dec 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I might be in a similar situation - what about Stern vs. Johnson for social entrepreneurship / impact / nonprofit sector?
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,671
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,149
Kudos: 83,697
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pinkflowers614
I might be in a similar situation - what about Stern vs. Johnson for social entrepreneurship / impact / nonprofit sector?

Same scholarship or any difference in funding?

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
pinkflowers614
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jul 2020
Last visit: 21 Dec 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
pinkflowers614
I might be in a similar situation - what about Stern vs. Johnson for social entrepreneurship / impact / nonprofit sector?

Same scholarship or any difference in funding?

Posted from my mobile device


roughly yes, as a forte fellow

edit: ive worked in consulting for the last four years at a ~big 4 type firm. over it, want out of consulting haha
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,671
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,149
Kudos: 83,697
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While social impact is actually fairly popular, I don’t think call I have a good sense about social impact recruiting at any of the schools. I know Yale had been Gung ho about social impact but then they been trying to shake off step reputation lately. My only guess would be that you want to minimize your loans in case the social impact pay does not match other opportunities, providing you with more options. At the same time there are many social impact opportunities in a variety of industries.... from finance to energy.


pinkflowers614
bb
pinkflowers614
I might be in a similar situation - what about Stern vs. Johnson for social entrepreneurship / impact / nonprofit sector?

Same scholarship or any difference in funding?

Posted from my mobile device


roughly yes, as a forte fellow

edit: ive worked in consulting for the last four years at a ~big 4 type firm. over it, want out of consulting haha
avatar
pinkflowers614
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jul 2020
Last visit: 21 Dec 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Makes sense - thank you!
[
quote="bb"]While social impact is actually fairly popular, I don’t think call I have a good sense about social impact recruiting at any of the schools. I know Yale had been Gung ho about social impact but then they been trying to shake off step reputation lately. My only guess would be that you want to minimize your loans in case the social impact pay does not match other opportunities, providing you with more options. At the same time there are many social impact opportunities in a variety of industries.... from finance to energy.


pinkflowers614
bb
pinkflowers614
I might be in a similar situation - what about Stern vs. Johnson for social entrepreneurship / impact / nonprofit sector?

Same scholarship or any difference in funding?

Posted from my mobile device


roughly yes, as a forte fellow

edit: ive worked in consulting for the last four years at a ~big 4 type firm. over it, want out of consulting haha
[/quote]
User avatar
Regenerate
User avatar
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 24 Apr 2020
Last visit: 16 Feb 2023
Posts: 499
Own Kudos:
305
 [2]
Given Kudos: 75
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I've been thinking quite a bit about how to value the worth of a scholarship from a school at a lower tier vs a lesser scholarship from a school in a higher tier.

I think I've decided that a 40% scholarship from Tier II school makes it a coin flip as to whether or not you're better off to have no scholarship to a Tier I school ... a 70% scholarship to compare Tier III vs Tier I ... 90% to compare Tier IV and Tier I ... and ... 100% for Tier IV and Tier I.

In an effort to help, GMATClub's recently published ranking of FT US MBA programs, the following schools are in the following Tiers:

Tier I -- Harvard and Stanford
Tier II -- Wharton
Tier III -- Booth, Kellogg and Haas
Tier IV -- Stern, Sloan, Yale, Darden, Columbia, Fuqua, Ross and Tuck
Tier V -- Anderson and Johnson
Tier VI -- McCombs
Tier VII -- Foster, Marshall, Jones and Tepper

So, for example, one would need at least a 70% scholarship to consider Foster, Marshall, Jones or Tepper vs. 0% at Anderson or Johnson.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
pinkflowers614
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jul 2020
Last visit: 21 Dec 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Regenerate
I've been thinking quite a bit about how to value the worth of a scholarship from a school at a lower tier vs a lesser scholarship from a school in a higher tier.

I think I've decided that a 40% scholarship from Tier II school makes it a coin flip as to whether or not you're better off to have no scholarship to a Tier I school ... a 70% scholarship to compare Tier III vs Tier I ... 90% to compare Tier IV and Tier I ... and ... 100% for Tier IV and Tier I.

In an effort to help, GMAT Club's recently published ranking of FT US MBA programs, the following schools are in the following Tiers:

Tier I -- Harvard and Stanford
Tier II -- Wharton
Tier III -- Booth, Kellogg and Haas
Tier IV -- Stern, Sloan, Yale, Darden, Columbia, Fuqua, Ross and Tuck
Tier V -- Anderson and Johnson
Tier VI -- McCombs
Tier VII -- Foster, Marshall, Jones and Tepper

So, for example, one would need at least a 70% scholarship to consider Foster, Marshall, Jones or Tepper vs. 0% at Anderson or Johnson.

Posted from my mobile device

hmmm this is an interesting perspective and interesting tiering! thank you for the food for thought.
avatar
Dreamer136
Joined: 30 Sep 2019
Last visit: 26 Mar 2022
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 4
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I had to choose between Cornell and Stern last year. I had full scholarship from Cornell and Stern and I chose Stern obviously. So, I can tell you from my perspective so far that you would definitely have better chance at MBB from Stern. This is coming from an international student.

I know a lot of batch-mates who have interviews from McKinsey and BCG. Then it is up to you that how well do you perform in an interview but one thing is for sure that Stern gives you that advantage of having a first step there compared to Johnson. And this is as per my networking that I did last year.

I am recruiting for consulting and you have access to every consulting firm at Stern. Don’t know much about Johnson but while networking, I didn’t see a lot of Johnson people at MBB. And with Stern you will definitely get an advantage at tier 2 consulting firms as well.

If you ask me, I would go for Stern over Johnson with 40% scholarship. Had it been anything above 70%, then it would have been a coin toss for me. But I still think Stern has a clear edge over Johnson and I would take that over 70k.
All the best!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Regenerate
User avatar
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 24 Apr 2020
Last visit: 16 Feb 2023
Posts: 499
Own Kudos:
305
 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pinkflowers614
Regenerate
I've been thinking quite a bit about how to value the worth of a scholarship from a school at a lower tier vs a lesser scholarship from a school in a higher tier.

I think I've decided that a 40% scholarship from Tier II school makes it a coin flip as to whether or not you're better off to have no scholarship to a Tier I school ... a 70% scholarship to compare Tier III vs Tier I ... 90% to compare Tier IV and Tier I ... and ... 100% for Tier IV and Tier I.

In an effort to help, GMAT Club's recently published ranking of FT US MBA programs, the following schools are in the following Tiers:

Tier I -- Harvard and Stanford
Tier II -- Wharton
Tier III -- Booth, Kellogg and Haas
Tier IV -- Stern, Sloan, Yale, Darden, Columbia, Fuqua, Ross and Tuck
Tier V -- Anderson and Johnson
Tier VI -- McCombs
Tier VII -- Foster, Marshall, Jones and Tepper

So, for example, one would need at least a 70% scholarship to consider Foster, Marshall, Jones or Tepper vs. 0% at Anderson or Johnson.

Posted from my mobile device

hmmm this is an interesting perspective and interesting tiering! thank you for the food for thought.

After actually typing out what has been rolling around between my ears for a while ... then re-reading the words, I think my rule of thumb needs a tweak or two ...

So, while the philosophical point doesn't change, I think the tactical implementation of the idea might, for two main reasons:

1) The GMATClub Ranking has twelve tiers comprising the Top 40 programs. The drops from one tier to the next are not symmetrical. Notably, the drop between Tier II and Tier III, the drop between Tier IV and Tier V, the drop between Tier VI and Tier VI, the drop between Tier VII and Tier VIII, and the drop between Tier VIII and Tier IX are larger than the others, to take an offer from a tier further than average away from the tier above will require a larger increase in financial aid. This affects the shape of the Financial Aid Consideration Curve.
2) Tier IV marks the end of schools that might be included in a Top 10 ranking (by GMAT Club or anyone else), and so to drop out of Tier IV would require a bigger increase in financial aid. This also affects the shape of the Financial Aid Consideration Curve.
3) Tier VII marks the end of the Top 20 (which is a key consideration for many MBA students), and so the greater financial aid that would be required to drop to a school outside the Top 20. This also affects the shape of the Financial Aid Consideration Curve.

My suggested changes can be seen here ==> https://gmatclub.com/forum/financial-ai ... 42190.html