Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 15:02 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 15:02
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
PierTotti17
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Last visit: 30 Jun 2020
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 30
Kudos: 18
 [1]
Please help solve this inequality 30 Dec 2018, 03:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Hi All,

This may seem like a very stupid question, but I'll post anyways since I can't find an answer anywhere.

I have been taught to solve equations such as: x^2 = 1 as such:
x^2 = 1
x^2 - 1 = 0
(x-1)(x+1) = 0
x=1 or -1

This method works for all quadratics, and is probably the quickest way to solve them.

Why is it that when we suddenly take out the "=" and replace it with either an > or < this method falls apart?

e.g.
x^2 < 1
x^2 - 1 < 0
(x-1)(x+1) < 0

x - 1 < 0 ---> x < 1 (which is correct)
but
x + 1 < 0 ---> x < -1 (which is incorrect, should be x > -1)

solution should be: -1 < x < 1

I am aware of the wavy line method and graphical method to solve inequalities, but I'd really appreciate if someone could explain why the method outline above fails to work in these situations. I hypothesize that this method does not work because of having to consider that x could be positive or negative (much like the way absolute value equations are solved), but nonetheless, I await help from experts.

Thanks in advance.

P.S., this question actually came from a DS question:

Is |x| < 1?

1) x^2 < 1
2) |x| < 1/x

obviously, in this scenario, it is easy to see that x^2 = |x| and thus statement 1 is sufficient (and so is 2 btw). But after answering the question, I went back and played around with statement 1 and then came up with this problem.

edit: I think I may have posted this in the wrong place. If so, moderators could you please move to the appropriate section?

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
DarkHorse2019
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 07 May 2020
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
275
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
WE:Marketing (Real Estate)
Posts: 88
Kudos: 275
Please help solve this inequality 30 Dec 2018, 04:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi PierTotti17,

I am not an expert but can I request you to go through Bunuel 's take on this chapter?
https://gmatclub.com/forum/math-absolut ... 86462.html

Also, this article https://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-mod ... l#p1622372 by chetan2u might also interest you. (<---- critical method here might help you)
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,002
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
My Reviews
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,002
Please help solve this inequality 30 Dec 2018, 05:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PierTotti17
Hi All,

This may seem like a very stupid question, but I'll post anyways since I can't find an answer anywhere.

I have been taught to solve equations such as: x^2 = 1 as such:
x^2 = 1
x^2 - 1 = 0
(x-1)(x+1) = 0
x=1 or -1

This method works for all quadratics, and is probably the quickest way to solve them.

Why is it that when we suddenly take out the "=" and replace it with either an > or < this method falls apart?

e.g.
x^2 < 1
x^2 - 1 < 0
(x-1)(x+1) < 0

x - 1 < 0 ---> x < 1 (which is correct)
but
x + 1 < 0 ---> x < -1 (which is incorrect, should be x > -1)

solution should be: -1 < x < 1

I am aware of the wavy line method and graphical method to solve inequalities, but I'd really appreciate if someone could explain why the method outline above fails to work in these situations. I hypothesize that this method does not work because of having to consider that x could be positive or negative (much like the way absolute value equations are solved), but nonetheless, I await help from experts.

Thanks in advance.

P.S., this question actually came from a DS question:

Is |x| < 1?

1) x^2 < 1
2) |x| < 1/x

obviously, in this scenario, it is easy to see that x^2 = |x| and thus statement 1 is sufficient (and so is 2 btw). But after answering the question, I went back and played around with statement 1 and then came up with this problem.

edit: I think I may have posted this in the wrong place. If so, moderators could you please move to the appropriate section?
Show more

Hi..

Why the below doesn't work..
x - 1 < 0 ---> x < 1 (which is correct)
but
x + 1 < 0 ---> x < -1 (which is incorrect, should be x > -1)

So you have (x-1)(X+1)<0... So the product of x-1 and X+1 is less than 0.
THIS will happen if one is positive and other negative..
1) say x-1>0, then X+1<0..
x-1>0 means X>1.. and X+1<0 means X<-1..
There is no overlap in the region...we had taken X >1, so it cannot be <-1.
Hence eliminate this option.

2) x-1<0 or X<1, then X+1>0..X>-1..
So combined -1<X<1..
User avatar
PierTotti17
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Last visit: 30 Jun 2020
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
18
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 30
Kudos: 18
Please help solve this inequality 30 Dec 2018, 05:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
PierTotti17
Hi All,

This may seem like a very stupid question, but I'll post anyways since I can't find an answer anywhere.

I have been taught to solve equations such as: x^2 = 1 as such:
x^2 = 1
x^2 - 1 = 0
(x-1)(x+1) = 0
x=1 or -1

This method works for all quadratics, and is probably the quickest way to solve them.

Why is it that when we suddenly take out the "=" and replace it with either an > or < this method falls apart?

e.g.
x^2 < 1
x^2 - 1 < 0
(x-1)(x+1) < 0

x - 1 < 0 ---> x < 1 (which is correct)
but
x + 1 < 0 ---> x < -1 (which is incorrect, should be x > -1)

solution should be: -1 < x < 1

I am aware of the wavy line method and graphical method to solve inequalities, but I'd really appreciate if someone could explain why the method outline above fails to work in these situations. I hypothesize that this method does not work because of having to consider that x could be positive or negative (much like the way absolute value equations are solved), but nonetheless, I await help from experts.

Thanks in advance.

P.S., this question actually came from a DS question:

Is |x| < 1?

1) x^2 < 1
2) |x| < 1/x

obviously, in this scenario, it is easy to see that x^2 = |x| and thus statement 1 is sufficient (and so is 2 btw). But after answering the question, I went back and played around with statement 1 and then came up with this problem.

edit: I think I may have posted this in the wrong place. If so, moderators could you please move to the appropriate section?

Hi..

Why the below doesn't work..
x - 1 < 0 ---> x < 1 (which is correct)
but
x + 1 < 0 ---> x < -1 (which is incorrect, should be x > -1)

So you have (x-1)(X+1)<0... So the product of x-1 and X+1 is less than 0.
THIS will happen if one is positive and other negative..
1) say x-1>0, then X+1<0..
x-1>0 means X>1.. and X+1<0 means X<-1..
There is no overlap in the region...we had taken X >1, so it cannot be <-1.
Hence eliminate this option.

2) x-1<0 or X<1, then X+1>0..X>-1..
So combined -1<X<1..
Show more

Thank you very much Chetan. I suspected that this was the case. It is frustrating that we cannot set each expression inside the brackets to < or > than 0 like we do with regular equations.
Had the question been:

x^2 > 1

would the approach still be valid?
i.e. the solutions to x^2 > 1 is the opposite, either x > 1 or x < -1.

x^2-1 > 0
(x-1)(x+1) > 0

hence both positive or both negative

say x-1 is negative and x+1 is also negative. Then:

x-1 < 0
x<1 (wrong)
and
x+1<0
x<-1 (right)

or both are positive

x-1>0
x>1 (right)
and
x+1>0
x>-1 (wrong)

now do we combine these sets to get the combined range?

Thanks again
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,002
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
My Reviews
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,002
Please help solve this inequality 30 Dec 2018, 05:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PierTotti17
chetan2u
PierTotti17
Hi All,

This may seem like a very stupid question, but I'll post anyways since I can't find an answer anywhere.

I have been taught to solve equations such as: x^2 = 1 as such:
x^2 = 1
x^2 - 1 = 0
(x-1)(x+1) = 0
x=1 or -1

This method works for all quadratics, and is probably the quickest way to solve them.

Why is it that when we suddenly take out the "=" and replace it with either an > or < this method falls apart?

e.g.
x^2 < 1
x^2 - 1 < 0
(x-1)(x+1) < 0

x - 1 < 0 ---> x < 1 (which is correct)
but
x + 1 < 0 ---> x < -1 (which is incorrect, should be x > -1)

solution should be: -1 < x < 1

I am aware of the wavy line method and graphical method to solve inequalities, but I'd really appreciate if someone could explain why the method outline above fails to work in these situations. I hypothesize that this method does not work because of having to consider that x could be positive or negative (much like the way absolute value equations are solved), but nonetheless, I await help from experts.

Thanks in advance.

P.S., this question actually came from a DS question:

Is |x| < 1?

1) x^2 < 1
2) |x| < 1/x

obviously, in this scenario, it is easy to see that x^2 = |x| and thus statement 1 is sufficient (and so is 2 btw). But after answering the question, I went back and played around with statement 1 and then came up with this problem.

edit: I think I may have posted this in the wrong place. If so, moderators could you please move to the appropriate section?

Hi..

Why the below doesn't work..
x - 1 < 0 ---> x < 1 (which is correct)
but
x + 1 < 0 ---> x < -1 (which is incorrect, should be x > -1)

So you have (x-1)(X+1)<0... So the product of x-1 and X+1 is less than 0.
THIS will happen if one is positive and other negative..
1) say x-1>0, then X+1<0..
x-1>0 means X>1.. and X+1<0 means X<-1..
There is no overlap in the region...we had taken X >1, so it cannot be <-1.
Hence eliminate this option.

2) x-1<0 or X<1, then X+1>0..X>-1..
So combined -1<X<1..

Thank you very much Chetan. I suspected that this was the case. It is frustrating that we cannot set each expression inside the brackets to < or > than 0 like we do with regular equations.
Had the question been:

x^2 > 1

would the approach still be valid?
i.e. the solutions to x^2 > 1 is the opposite, either x > 1 or x < -1.

x^2-1 > 0
(x-1)(x+1) > 0

hence both positive or both negative

say x-1 is negative and x+1 is also negative. Then:

x-1 < 0
x<1 (wrong)
and
x+1<0
x<-1 (right)

or both are positive

x-1>0
x>1 (right)
and
x+1>0
x>-1 (wrong)

now do we combine these sets to get the combined range?

Thanks again
Show more

Yes..
Others simply \(x^2<1... Means ....|X|<1....-1<X<1\)
And \(x^2>1...|X|>1...X<-1 .. and...X>1\)
User avatar
PierTotti17
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Last visit: 30 Jun 2020
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
18
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 30
Kudos: 18
Please help solve this inequality 30 Dec 2018, 06:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great, thank you for the insight and for the prompt replies Chetan!!

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Bunuel
Math Expert
109785 posts