Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 20:01 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 20:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,061
Own Kudos:
838,712
 [7]
Given Kudos: 111,271
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,061
Kudos: 838,712
 [7]
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dereno
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 30 Jul 2026
Posts: 1,399
Own Kudos:
1,414
 [2]
Given Kudos: 433
Posts: 1,399
Kudos: 1,414
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,061
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,271
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,061
Kudos: 838,712
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mkeshri185
Joined: 01 May 2025
Last visit: 27 May 2026
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 108
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I did not get why B is the answer?. It says the Customer Acquisition was inflated means 'INCOMING' customers were LESS than actually shown. But it doesn't talk about the falling numbers. Means the falling is the same level (as nothing is given about falling , so we assume it to be same' but the incoming of customers are actually less.Then it should be of more concern not less concern.

If Reported added customers = 10 M and people going away = 5M so earlier it was problematic. But answer is looking for something which says this is LESS WORSE than the shown. B option says Reported data was inflated means in reality Reported customer is less than 10 M so lets say Actual data = 8M then out of 8M users , 5M got away which is far more problematic.

We can't just say the data is flawed so it's not of that much concern.
Still if you choose B then explain my example also.
Bunuel


Official Explanation:



Answer: B

We have to somehow show that the statistics are not a sign for worry. B does this best by stating that the original statistics were most likely inflated so the fall in numbers may not actually be as steep as it looks.

(A) But what about after a few months? This would still be a worrying sign for the companies.

(B) The correct answer.

(C) There is no real connection between the sale of mobile phone handsets and how many subscribers join mobile phone companies every month.

(D) If despite this fact the numbers are going down, then there must be some problem.

(E) Irrelevant to the argument.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey, I struggled with this answer for a while too. I finally made peace with the following logic. Not sure how sound it is, but it made sense to me.
The concern that we're looking to address is that this reported fall in numbers may not necessarily be as terrible as it seems.

B gives us some indication that the fall may not be as drastic as it looks because the base we're looking at is itself inflated. Assume the reported [inflated] number for the previous month is 10 Mn and the current decline is 2 Mn. Now a drop from +10 to -2 Mn looks bad. But if we are told that the accurate figure for the prior month is 5 Mn, the drop seems less scary.

Note that this situation is still not ideal but it is not as terrible as it first looked and this is exactly what the question asks us to find.

Apologies in case of any mistakes and hope this helps.
mkeshri185
I did not get why B is the answer?. It says the Customer Acquisition was inflated means 'INCOMING' customers were LESS than actually shown. But it doesn't talk about the falling numbers. Means the falling is the same level (as nothing is given about falling , so we assume it to be same' but the incoming of customers are actually less.Then it should be of more concern not less concern.

If Reported added customers = 10 M and people going away = 5M so earlier it was problematic. But answer is looking for something which says this is LESS WORSE than the shown. B option says Reported data was inflated means in reality Reported customer is less than 10 M so lets say Actual data = 8M then out of 8M users , 5M got away which is far more problematic.

We can't just say the data is flawed so it's not of that much concern.
Still if you choose B then explain my example also.

User avatar
Aman1993
Joined: 04 Jan 2026
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: IIM HEC
Schools: IIM HEC
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel can you explain how B is the correct answer? This is a paradox question and we know that previously companies used to report millions new customers but now numbers are falling. If B is correct answer then this will not solve the paradox, as this will mean in reality the fall in new customers is even more (a greater sign of worry). I think correct answer should be C.
Bunuel


Official Explanation:



Answer: B

We have to somehow show that the statistics are not a sign for worry. B does this best by stating that the original statistics were most likely inflated so the fall in numbers may not actually be as steep as it looks.

(A) But what about after a few months? This would still be a worrying sign for the companies.

(B) The correct answer.

(C) There is no real connection between the sale of mobile phone handsets and how many subscribers join mobile phone companies every month.

(D) If despite this fact the numbers are going down, then there must be some problem.

(E) Irrelevant to the argument.
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,816
Own Kudos:
14,320
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,816
Kudos: 14,320
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Which of the following best completes the passage below?

When mobile phone companies, used to reporting several million new customers in a month, do the opposite and report a sharp fall in that number, you know that the country’s most dynamic industry has entered a new, more troubled phase. However, this statistic may not necessarily be as much of a cause for concern as it looks because ________________________.

The passage says the reported number of new customers has sharply fallen. But then it says this may look worse than it really is. So the blank must explain why the reported fall may be misleading, not why the companies can survive despite the fall.

(A) mobile phone companies have huge cash reserves so they will not face the problem of cash flow for a few months at least

This does not explain why the statistic itself may be less concerning. It only says companies can manage financially for a short time.

(B) inflated claims about new customer acquisition have been very much a part of the industry story so far

This is correct. If earlier reports of new customers were inflated, then the sharp fall in reported new customers may partly reflect more realistic reporting, not a real collapse in demand. That makes the statistic less alarming.

(C) the sales of mobile phone handsets hasn’t fallen down appreciably

Incorrect. This does not show that the fall in new customers is misleading. Existing customers may still be buying replacement or upgraded handsets, so handset sales can remain high even while new customer acquisition falls sharply. It also does not establish that industry revenue is unchanged.

(D) other competitors have not entered the market in huge numbers

This does not explain why the fall is less concerning. Fewer competitors may reduce pressure, but it does not explain the sharp drop in new customers.

(E) mobile phone companies are making huge investments in widening their network coverage

This may be good for the future, but it does not explain why the current statistic is less worrying.

Answer: (B)
avatar
ArmaanBajaj
Joined: 11 Aug 2024
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
GMAT Focus 1: 625 Q81 V81 DI81
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 625 Q81 V81 DI81
Posts: 27
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Doesn't C prove that the stats are misleading, coz despite no new customers, sales are rising, so the industry is moving without any changes in the revenue
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,816
Own Kudos:
14,320
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,816
Kudos: 14,320
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ArmaanBajaj
Doesn't C prove that the stats are misleading, coz despite no new customers, sales are rising, so the industry is moving without any changes in the revenue

I think the key issue is that (C) does not say sales are rising, only that handset sales have not fallen much.

More importantly, handset sales do not necessarily mean new customers. Existing customers may simply be replacing or upgrading their phones. So (C) does not show that the decline in new customer acquisition is misleading.

(B) does exactly that. If earlier new-customer figures were inflated, then the current sharp fall may partly reflect more accurate reporting rather than a genuine collapse in demand.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,287
Kudos: 33,892
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ArmaanBajaj,

Two slips are hiding in that reading.

Slip 1: handset sales are not the new-customer statistic. The passage is worried about one number, the sharp fall in new customers per month, and the blank has to explain why that number is less alarming than it looks. Handset sales are a different metric, and existing customers buy handsets too, for upgrades and replacements. So handset sales can hold steady while new sign-ups collapse. C says nothing about whether the falling new-customer figure is misleading.

Slip 2: "hasn't fallen appreciably" is not "rising." You read C as sales rising, then concluded revenue is stable. Even taken at face value, it is a true but irrelevant fact.

Now B. It says the earlier new-customer figures were inflated, which hits the statistic itself: if the old highs were exaggerated, the reported "sharp fall" is partly numbers returning to reality rather than a real collapse. That is exactly why the drop "may not be as much of a cause for concern as it looks."

A simpler version. A gym reports far fewer new members this month. Which fact makes that less worrying?

- "Its water bottle sales haven't fallen." Different metric. Regulars buy bottles regardless of sign-ups, so this tells you nothing about whether the drop is real. (This is C.)
- "It had been double-counting sign-ups all along." Now the alarming drop is partly just cleaner counting. (This is B.)

Only the second explains the statistic itself away, and that is the move the blank needs.

Answer: B

ArmaanBajaj
Doesn't C prove that the stats are misleading, coz despite no new customers, sales are rising, so the industry is moving without any changes in the revenue
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts