Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
47%
(02:03)
correct 53%
(02:10)
wrong
based on 135
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Twenty-five miles north of Mesa City, a conservation group constructed a wildlife observation deck overlooking a newly protected wetland. The group planted native aquatic plants and introduced several insect species to support local biodiversity. Since the wetland was completed, many migratory birds have made it a regular stop during seasonal travel. The group expects to fund ongoing maintenance through photography permits and guided tours, hoping to break even within the first year.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above?
(A) Without the observation deck, the wetland would have gone unnoticed by migratory birds. (B) The conservation group does not rely on selling access to the wetland’s natural resources for its revenue. (C) The presence of insect species is the primary reason migratory birds began visiting the wetland. (D) Installing fences to limit public access to the wetland would significantly reduce the site's profitability. (E) The wetland reduces local temperatures by creating a microclimate around Mesa City.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
All others are too strong except B) which can be clearly inferred from the passage.
A) We are not sure
C) Not the primary reason since insects and plants, both are mentioned
D) Opposite
E) No where mentioned
Rashie1
Twenty-five miles north of Mesa City, a conservation group constructed a wildlife observation deck overlooking a newly protected wetland. The group planted native aquatic plants and introduced several insect species to support local biodiversity. Since the wetland was completed, many migratory birds have made it a regular stop during seasonal travel. The group expects to fund ongoing maintenance through photography permits and guided tours, hoping to break even within the first year.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above?
(A) Without the observation deck, the wetland would have gone unnoticed by migratory birds. (B) The conservation group does not rely on selling access to the wetland’s natural resources for its revenue. (C) The presence of insect species is the primary reason migratory birds began visiting the wetland. (D) Installing fences to limit public access to the wetland would significantly reduce the site's profitability. (E) The wetland reduces local temperatures by creating a microclimate around Mesa City.
Funding comes from permits and tours, not selling natural resources - and this is exactly what option B says. The other options are claims not supported by the passage. Answer: (B)
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.