A Sumatran rhinoceros was recently born in a Cincinnati zoo, the first birth in captivity of that species in more than a century, making it a landmark development for the effort to save the endangered animal.
A) A Sumatran rhinoceros was recently born in a Cincinnati zoo, the first birth in captivity of that species in more than a century, making it
B) A Sumatran rhinoceros was recently born in a Cincinnati zoo, and as the first birth of that species in captivity for more than a century, it is
C) A Sumatran rhinoceros recently born in a Cincinnati zoo, as the first birth for that species in captivity for over a century, is
D) The recent birth of a Sumatran rhinoceros in a Cincinnati zoo, the first birth in captivity for that species in over a century, is
E) The recent birth of a Sumatran rhinoceros, as the first birth in over a century of that species in captivity, took place in a Cincinnati zoo,
Meaning : A Sumatran rhinoceros was recently born in a Cincinnati zoo. The birth of the rhinoceros is the first birth in over a century of that species, making it a landmark development for the effort to save the endangered animal.
POE:
A) The first birth should point to a noun in the previous clause, but there is no noun in the previous clause – “A Sumatran rhinoceros was recently born in a Cincinnati zoo”.
B) makes the modifier as parallel entity and that changes the meaning.
C) “as the first birth for the species”. What as the first birth is not clear.
E) “as the first birth”. What as the first birth is not clear.
Option D) The recent birth of a Sumatran rhinoceros in a Cincinnati zoo, the first birth in captivity for that species in over a century, is a landmark development for the effort to save the endangered animal.
I chose Option D) for the following reasons:
1) “the first birth” modifies the “recent birth” in the previous clause.
2) If I remove the modifier “, the first birth in captivity for that species in over a century”, the original sentence alone makes perfect sense.
Doubts:
1) Is the option D) falls in the category of noun+noun modifier?
Normally I have seen the following structure for noun+noun modifier
clause,noun that/which modifier
Here there is no mention of “that/which” and gives an impression of noun modifier and as I know noun modifier can only modify only the close nouns.
Can sombody please clarify?