Statement 1 - ab^2<b^2. On simplifying ab^2-b^2<0, further simplifying b^2(a-1)<0, which makes a<1 & b^ can never be negative as it is a square of a number. Now since a<1 means for a=-1, ab will be <0 but if a can be 0 also in which case ab=0 and hence not sufficient.
Statement 2 - b^2<b. Simplifying, b^2-b<0, further simplifying b(b-1)<0. This states that b<1 and as b<0 also falls in the range but this only states about the polarity of b and since the main equation has dependence on value of a also which is not covered here, hence this statement is also insufficient.
Statement 1+2 - states the polarity of b as negative but the dual possibility of a (i.e a can be 0 as well as negative) from Statement 1.hence in either case either ab=0 or ab>0 since (-ve)*(-ve)=+ve, so ab is not <0. hence C.
What is the original OA.
Sent from my SM-N920G using
GMAT Club Forum mobile app