Last visit was: 19 Jul 2025, 18:07 It is currently 19 Jul 2025, 18:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
4,987
 [153]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,987
 [153]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
139
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 11,294
Own Kudos:
41,843
 [25]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 11,294
Kudos: 41,843
 [25]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,584
 [15]
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
 [15]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Mbawarrior01
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Last visit: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
358
 [2]
Given Kudos: 198
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 93
Kudos: 358
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement : Rats > Crowding > Increased Aggression
Rhesus Monkeys > Crowding > Does not increase aggression but instances of coping behavior


Conclusion : Rhesus monkeys response to monkeys, applies to all monkeys.

Assumption : Effect on Rhesus monkeys ---means---> Effect on all monkeys.

A. The rhesus monkeys is the species of monkey that is more prone to fighting. Strengthens

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them. States the same

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions
This may weaken the argument. Hold it

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in more attacks than the others Out of scope

E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiment were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances. may be the one but "Some" makes it doubtful

IMO C, though not sure on this one. Waiting for OA.
User avatar
CounterSniper
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Last visit: 14 Apr 2023
Posts: 618
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Posts: 618
Kudos: 803
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly, but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The rhesus monkeys is the species of monkey that is more prone to fighting

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in more attacks than the others

E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiment were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances.


There is a sampling issue with the conclusion !!
as aditi already mentioned , experiments were done on rhesus monkeys while the conclusion is held true for all primates.
C.. for me best explains the reason for rhesus monkeys behaviour because of which the conclusion cannot be held true for all primates .
avatar
rs47
Joined: 12 Feb 2014
Last visit: 27 Jun 2022
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
373
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Schools: LBS MIF '19
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.3
Schools: LBS MIF '19
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
Posts: 76
Kudos: 373
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am not sure but for some reason, I feel the answer is B.. if coping behaviour were adopted to forestall acts of aggression, it means the monkeys would have probably got aggressive (if not for the coping behaviour) and thus weakens the conclusion to some extent..
User avatar
CounterSniper
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Last visit: 14 Apr 2023
Posts: 618
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Posts: 618
Kudos: 803
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rs47
I am not sure but for some reason, I feel the answer is B.. if coping behaviour were adopted to forestall acts of aggression, it means the monkeys would have probably got aggressive (if not for the coping behaviour) and thus weakens the conclusion to some extent..

:?
little confused here !!
now I think answer can be b !!
I don't think C weakens the conclusion at all . If the monkeys are observed to have all kinds on coping behaviour in un crowded envt , they might have the same in crowded as well , it in fact strengthens the conclusion.
User avatar
Mbawarrior01
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Last visit: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 198
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 93
Kudos: 358
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let me read it again,

Conclusion says : Doubtful that Crowding >>increases >> aggression

Option B says : Coping behavior in crowded monkeys >> decreases/forestall >> aggression.

Doesn't this imply that crowding leads to coping behavior, which in turn decreases aggression.

That's exactly what will strengthen the conclusion that crowding doesn't significantly increase aggression.

Phew!! Experts please advise, what am I missing here
User avatar
adiagr
Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Last visit: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 204
Own Kudos:
1,097
 [14]
Given Kudos: 9
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 204
Kudos: 1,097
 [14]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly, but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The rhesus monkeys is the species of monkey that is more prone to fighting

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in more attacks than the others

E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiment were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances.


The argument cites evidence that a recent experiment shows that crowding resulted in increased instances of coping - submissive gestures.
Based on this evidence argument concludes that crowding does not result in aggression.

Let us check each option and see which option weakens this argument.

A. This does not relate to our main argument (what is the behaviour of rhesus monkeys when they are in a crowded atmosphere). Ignore this option.

B. This option discusses both key ideas: Coping behavior as well as aggression. Hold

C. Irrelevant to our argument. We have to discuss their behaviour in crowded conditions. Ignore this option.

D. Very subjective information. Not strong enough to support or weaken conclusion. Ignore this option.

E. Issue is not about contrasting this experiment with natural circumstances. Ignore this option.


By elimination also , B comes out as winner.

Let us quickly analyse it.

B says that Coping behaviour was infact an outcome to stop aggressive behaviour. So aggression was there and the submissive gestures were developed by group members for their protection. In light of this information, we cannot say that crowding does not cause aggression.

[Argument is saying thus: Suppose A, B and C are 3 events

Earlier experiment (Rat) says A --> B (A causes B. Crowding causes Aggression)

Present Argument says, we saw that C occurred. so

A does not cause B. It causes C.

Correct Option says that the logical flow is that

A --> B --> C . ]
avatar
rahulkashyap
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Last visit: 24 Feb 2019
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 170
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not able to pick between b and c

daagh chetan2u

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
4,987
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,987
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Argument: In rats, Crowding --> Aggressive behavior
But in rhesus monkeys, Crowding --> Coping behavior
So recent studies create a doubt on whether Crowding actually causes aggressive behavior

A. The rhesus monkeys is the species of monkey that is more prone to fighting - Incorrect - The rhesus monkeys may be prone to fighting but there is no relationship between crowding and aggressive behavior

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them - Correct - Crowding causes aggressive behavior but coping behavior is used to mask the aggressive behavior.

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions - Incorrect - Relationship is stated between coping behavior and uncrowded conditions. Not useful.

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in more attacks than the others - Incorrect - Irrelevant

E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiment were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances. - Irrelevant

Answer: B
avatar
rahulkashyap
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Last visit: 24 Feb 2019
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 170
Kudos: 72
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
rahulkashyap
Not able to pick between b and c

daagh chetan2u

Posted from my mobile device


In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly, but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions

Hi,

the argument says that in rats, crowding led to more attacks on each other. But in a experiment with rhesus monkeys, # of attacks did not increase but 'coping behaviour' did.
Now the argument claims that crowding does not increase aggressive nature..

NOTE we are not talking of attacks but aggressive nature. - this should tell us that there MUST be something which happens amongst the monkeys which does not allow these aggressive nature to turn into ATTACKS..

lets see B and C..


B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them
See the NOTE above. More the monkeys aggressive, more do other monkeys try to adjust to that by changing their behaviour so that the aggressive nature does not result into physical attacks...
this clearly WEAKENS the claim as the aggressive nature has increased but others have adopted a different approach to it..


C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions
This would in a way STRENGTHEN the claim.....
The COPING behaviour is not common ONLY to crowded coditions but to uncrowded conditions too. This means that there is NO role played by aggressive attitude and hence MAY be the claim is correct

Hi,
In b, do u mean that a few monkeys are getting aggressive but there are other few which counter balance this by coping, hence resulting in no attacks?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 11,294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 11,294
Kudos: 41,843
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rahulkashyap
chetan2u
rahulkashyap
Not able to pick between b and c

daagh chetan2u

Posted from my mobile device


In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly, but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions

Hi,

the argument says that in rats, crowding led to more attacks on each other. But in a experiment with rhesus monkeys, # of attacks did not increase but 'coping behaviour' did.
Now the argument claims that crowding does not increase aggressive nature..

NOTE we are not talking of attacks but aggressive nature. - this should tell us that there MUST be something which happens amongst the monkeys which does not allow these aggressive nature to turn into ATTACKS..

lets see B and C..


B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them
See the NOTE above. More the monkeys aggressive, more do other monkeys try to adjust to that by changing their behaviour so that the aggressive nature does not result into physical attacks...
this clearly WEAKENS the claim as the aggressive nature has increased but others have adopted a different approach to it..


C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions
This would in a way STRENGTHEN the claim.....
The COPING behaviour is not common ONLY to crowded coditions but to uncrowded conditions too. This means that there is NO role played by aggressive attitude and hence MAY be the claim is correct

Hi,
In b, do u mean that a few monkeys are getting aggressive but there are other few which counter balance this by coping, hence resulting in no attacks?

Posted from my mobile device

Yes, I would not say B is the best possible answer but we are looking for the best possible answer and C can not be an answer under any circumstances.....

so when the monkeys are becoming MORE aggressive, there are many others, may be kids or mothers or weaker ones, who become submissive and increase 'coping behaviour'
User avatar
mitko20m
Joined: 18 Jan 2012
Last visit: 27 Jun 2017
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 30
Kudos: 384
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the 1960 studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument.

A. The rhesus monkey is the species of monkey that is most prone to fighting.
B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them.
C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.
D. Some individual monkeys in the experiments were involved in more attacks than others.
E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiments were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances.
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,987
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mitko20m
In the 1960 studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument.

A. The rhesus monkey is the species of monkey that is most prone to fighting.
B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them.
C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.
D. Some individual monkeys in the experiments were involved in more attacks than others.
E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiments were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances.

Topic Merged. Please refer to the above discussion and comment if you have any doubts.
avatar
hansradja
Joined: 20 Apr 2016
Last visit: 19 Jun 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly, but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The rhesus monkeys is the species of monkey that is more prone to fighting

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in more attacks than the others

E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiment were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances.

From the weakening question above, we need to attack the conclusion, which stated crowding is not triger aggresive behavior. Statement B attack this conclusion by saying crowding implulse agrresive behavior, which the monkey not express it because they want to forestall the act of aggresive
avatar
rahulk28011
Joined: 10 Apr 2017
Last visit: 11 Dec 2017
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 7
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
how is B correct? When i see it, i see its strengthening than weakening. I found this question while giving my GMAT mock on GMAT Prep. While reviewing i found OA is B. Its bizarre and i cant understand, how B can be the right weakening option.
User avatar
srikanth9502
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Last visit: 06 Dec 2017
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
317
 [3]
Given Kudos: 124
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 97
Kudos: 317
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly, but rather instances of "coping" behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals, and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The rhesus monkeys is the species of monkey that is more prone to fighting

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in more attacks than the others

E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiment were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances.


Conclusion -> "The evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates"

C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions

It states that the coping behaviour is observed in the normal conditions as well. This means that the crowding had no impact on the behaviour of the monkeys.
So this option indeed strengthens the argument by implying that the crowding does not increase the aggressive impulses.

B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them.

This option implies that there is indeed a possibility of aggression and the monkeys had to alter their behaviour inorder to forestall such effect.
avatar
hassu13
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Last visit: 24 Jul 2021
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Schools: IMD '21
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Schools: IMD '21
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 30
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I understand that B is a weakener, C is a strengthener but I am unable to knock off D.
Can experts pl explain me how D is irrlevant. If some monkeys were involved in more attacks than the others then definitely the attacks did take place and attacks can logically take place because of aggression or aggressive impulses. This scenario, in turn, tends to weaken the conclusion.
Can someone pl correct me.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 7,359
Own Kudos:
68,584
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,969
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,359
Kudos: 68,584
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hassu13
I understand that B is a weakener, C is a strengthener but I am unable to knock off D.
Can experts pl explain me how D is irrlevant. If some monkeys were involved in more attacks than the others then definitely the attacks did take place and attacks can logically take place because of aggression or aggressive impulses. This scenario, in turn, tends to weaken the conclusion.
Can someone pl correct me.
Let's reconnect with the specific wording in the conclusion:

Quote:
Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.
Now let's compare to the wording in (D):

Quote:
(D) Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in more attacks than the others
The author concludes that it is doubtful that crowding has led to a significant, overall increase in aggressive impulses in primates.

Sure, we could weaken this conclusion by observing that there indeed has been a significant, overall increase in aggressive behavior among the rhesus monkeys. But this is not what choice (D) says.

(D) says that some monkeys were involved in more attacks than other monkeys. This is a comparison between two groups of monkeys. It doesn't tell us anything about the overall level of attacks.

Furthermore, choice (D) focuses on attacks, which (as we've discussed earlier in this thread) are not the same as impulses.

For these two reasons, we can eliminate (D). I hope this helps!
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts