GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 13 Oct 2019, 13:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4253
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Jul 2015, 06:17
13
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

67% (02:10) correct 33% (02:22) wrong based on 780 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.

B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.

C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.

D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States.

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.

_________________

Originally posted by souvik101990 on 18 Feb 2015, 23:02.
Last edited by Harley1980 on 09 Jul 2015, 06:17, edited 1 time in total.
OA added
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 199
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2015, 01:14
My pick is option E.

waiting for OE.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 268
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2015, 02:17
1
souvik101990 wrote:
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.

B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.

C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.

D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States.

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.


CONCLUSION- Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protectionswillsystematically suppress dissent.

"A" contradicts the conclusion.... U could say " but UK doesnt "..... ie gives example through which conclusion weakened..... ANS = "A"....imo
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 45
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2015, 07:20
Conclusion : Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent
Absence of equally extensive protection = systematic suppression of dissent
B, C, D dont have any influence on the conclusion
even if E were true it doesnt compromise the conclusion
IMO (A)
_________________
Kudos if it helped you in any way
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Birds fly because they have wings, not because they have sky.
Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 208
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2015, 22:32
souvik101990 wrote:
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.

B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.

C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.

D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States.

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.


The question stem says: Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

The conclusion is made for all such democracies which "do not enforce equally extensive protections", and the conclusion is that any such democracy will "systematically suppress dissent". Hence, any option that contradicts this statement, i.e. provides example of a democracy which "doesn't enforce equally extensive protections" and still doesn't "systematically suppress dissent" will be the one.

Only option A provides such an example and hence that is my pick.
_________________
Regards,
J

--------------------------------------------------
Consider Kudos if I helped in some way!!!

Perseverance is the hard work you do after you get tired of doing the hard work you already did.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Applied
Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 125
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2015, 03:24
option A provides reason to believe that without having protective amendments also the issue can be dealt with hence it weakens the
argument
Math Expert
avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7940
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2015, 05:10
1
ans A...
statement one weakens the argument as the arguement includes all democracy and A provides an exception...
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Feb 2015
Posts: 22
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2015, 07:09
Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
Weakens. provide alternative.

B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
Irelevant

C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
strengthens.

D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
irrelevant

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
Trap. It talks about democratic countries but it never states anything about extensive protections so there maybe chance that those have extensive protections but still suppress dissent.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 136
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2015, 07:20
souvik101990 wrote:
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.

B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.

C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.

D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States.

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.


Its A.
CAUSE--->NO EFFECT
This weakens
:-D
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2401
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2017, 22:34
1
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

Type - weakens

This argument states that the United States created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable intrusions. It observes that such intrusions are often committed by dictatorships. It then makes a rather sweeping conclusion that any country without similar protections will suppress dissent. Such a broad conclusion could be weakened by citing one case in which that pattern does not hold.

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent. - This choice cites a country without such protections that does not suppress dissent. One example weakens the conclusion, which said no country would refrain from suppressing dissent without such protections.-Correct
B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries. - This choice is irrelevant, as the conclusion does not address the effectiveness of different types of government. In fact, as it is limited to democracies; any information about dictatorships is irrelevant.
C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war. - This choice does not weaken the argument. The conclusion said “systematically suppress dissent” and this statement talks about “haphazard” suppression under special circumstances. Furthermore, we do not know if these democracies had equally extensive protections.
D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States. - Whether or not the United States supported a dictatorship is irrelevant to the conclusion that democracies without extensive protections will eventually suppress dissent.
E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent. - This choice, if anything, strengthens the argument. It presents the example of democracies without such protections that do suppress dissent.

Answer A
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 Jan 2016
Posts: 180
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2017, 20:29
ok, how do we know that UK is a democracy? is that supposed to be general knowledge assumed to be known by the test taker?
Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Aug 2015
Posts: 76
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.39
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2017, 23:15
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

Type: Weaken

Conclusion: Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

How to weaken?
1) A similar situation but a different outcome: Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections BUT ALSO DOESNOT SUPPRESSES DISSENT.
2) Something that breaks the cause and effect link.


A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
A similar situation but a different outcome. This option may weaken the argument.

B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
This falls outside the scope of the problem.

C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
This option talks about democracy but the argument talks about a democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections. Therefore, democracy in the argument is a democracy with a certain condition. It also doesn't attack the cause and effect link.

D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
Out od scope of the problem.

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
But we have no information whether the democracy in the former Soviet Union practices extensive protections or not.

Thus, option A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 23 Aug 2016
Posts: 101
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 2.84
WE: Other (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2017, 02:54
chetan2u wrote:
ans A...
statement one weakens the argument as the arguement includes all democracy and A provides an exception...



Hello Expert,

But how are we supposed to understand that the "United Kingdom" is a democracy.

Nowhere is that evident.

am i right? or is there a catch i am not getting?

Thanks and Regards,
Honneeey
_________________
Thanks and Regards,

Honneeey.

In former years,Used to run for "Likes", nowadays, craving for "Kudos". :D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 329
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Reviews Badge
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2017, 03:12
chetan2u wrote:
ans A...
statement one weakens the argument as the arguement includes all democracy and A provides an exception...



We have to assume that UK is a democratic nation. No where it is implied in the passage that UK is democratic. In this Case wont E make a better option?
VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1493
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2017, 11:49
boiled down to A and E, but I picked E => :(
Now I realize that "any" and "at least" are traps.
E talks about some democracy still has suppress on dissent.
A talks about no suppress on dissent while no protection against dictator. => A is correct
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 341
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2017, 00:59
1
goforgmat wrote:
chetan2u wrote:
ans A...
statement one weakens the argument as the arguement includes all democracy and A provides an exception...



We have to assume that UK is a democratic nation. No where it is implied in the passage that UK is democratic. In this Case wont E make a better option?


A>
The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.

parliamentary system => democracy
if there is no parliament system, it has be ruled by dictatorship.

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.

E is missing an important link.
democracy+ no extensive protection system => suppress dissent
VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1493
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2017, 08:52
the passage talks about the system => C,E are out
the key word here is "any" => A is correct b/c it points out a case that the conclusion does not hold true.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5891
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2018, 05:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly   [#permalink] 09 Oct 2018, 05:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Weaken Revision: The American Revolution arose partly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne