Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:07 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:07
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
605-655 Level|   Weaken|      
User avatar
dancinggeometry
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Last visit: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
688
 [24]
Posts: 62
Kudos: 688
 [24]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se Updated on: 09 Oct 2019, 21:00
Originally posted by dancinggeometry on 22 Sep 2008, 00:57.
Last edited by Bunuel on 09 Oct 2019, 21:00, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (02:11) correct 31% (02:23) wrong based on 1815 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

(A) The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
(B) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
(C) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
(D) Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
(E) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,311
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,311
 [3]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 10 Apr 2021, 07:00
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dancinggeometry
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

(A) The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
(B) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
(C) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
(D) Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
(E) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
Show more

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



This argument states that the United States created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable intrusions. It observes that such intrusions are often committed by dictatorships. It then makes a rather sweeping conclusion that any country without similar protections will suppress dissent. Such a broad conclusion could be weakened by citing one case in which that pattern does not hold.

(A) CORRECT. This choice cites a country without such protections that does not suppress dissent. One example weakens the conclusion, which said no country would refrain from suppressing dissent without such protections.

(B) This choice is irrelevant, as the conclusion does not address the effectiveness of different types of government. In fact, as it is limited to democracies; any information about dictatorships is irrelevant.

(C) This choice does not weaken the argument. The conclusion said “systematically suppress dissent” and this statement talks about “haphazard” suppression under special circumstances. Furthermore, we do not know if these democracies had equally extensive protections.

(D) Whether or not the United States supported a dictatorship is irrelevant to the conclusion that democracies without extensive protections will eventually suppress dissent.

(E) This choice, if anything, strengthens the argument. It presents the example of democracies without such protections that do suppress dissent.
General Discussion
User avatar
semwal
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 May 2013
Last visit: 13 May 2017
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
515
 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE:Human Resources (Human Resources)
Schools: XLRI GM"18
Posts: 206
Kudos: 515
 [1]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 19 Feb 2015, 02:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
souvik101990
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.

B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.

C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.

D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States.

E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
Show more

CONCLUSION- Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protectionswillsystematically suppress dissent.

"A" contradicts the conclusion.... U could say " but UK doesnt "..... ie gives example through which conclusion weakened..... ANS = "A"....imo
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,124
Own Kudos:
1,263
 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '20 (WD)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Stanford '20 (WD)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,124
Kudos: 1,263
 [1]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 25 Dec 2015, 12:01
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dancinggeometry
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.
Show more

took me some time to understand what suppress dissent actually means.
since we are talking that any democracy that DOES not enforce... will suppress dissent.
we need an answer that would prove that the above is wrong.

Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

(A) The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
ok, so we have an example of democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections. moreover, UK has never suppressed dissent. this is a clear weakener.

(B) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
well, good for them, but this doesn't actually weaken the argument.

(C) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
tempting one. Nevertheless, incorrect one. we are talking about enforcing equally extensive protections, and that by not doing this, the country will suppress dissent. this one is an iSWAT. during war - is not something we are interested.

(D) Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
good for them, but doesn't weaken the argument.

(E) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
well, again, not a weakener.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,961
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,961
 [1]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 01 Feb 2017, 22:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

Type - weakens

This argument states that the United States created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable intrusions. It observes that such intrusions are often committed by dictatorships. It then makes a rather sweeping conclusion that any country without similar protections will suppress dissent. Such a broad conclusion could be weakened by citing one case in which that pattern does not hold.

A. The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent. - This choice cites a country without such protections that does not suppress dissent. One example weakens the conclusion, which said no country would refrain from suppressing dissent without such protections.-Correct
B. Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries. - This choice is irrelevant, as the conclusion does not address the effectiveness of different types of government. In fact, as it is limited to democracies; any information about dictatorships is irrelevant.
C. Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war. - This choice does not weaken the argument. The conclusion said “systematically suppress dissent” and this statement talks about “haphazard” suppression under special circumstances. Furthermore, we do not know if these democracies had equally extensive protections.
D. Some dictators have been supported by the United States. - Whether or not the United States supported a dictatorship is irrelevant to the conclusion that democracies without extensive protections will eventually suppress dissent.
E. At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent. - This choice, if anything, strengthens the argument. It presents the example of democracies without such protections that do suppress dissent.

Answer A
User avatar
dcummins
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
2,325
 [1]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: INSEAD Sept'21 Intake (WA$$$) Melbourne (A$$$$) AGSM (A$$$$) Kellogg '23 (WL) Said '22 (A$$$$) CBS '23 (D) Booth '23 (WA) Anderson '23 (WA) Cambridge '22 (WL) LBS '23 (D) Stern '24 (WA)
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: INSEAD Sept'21 Intake (WA$$$) Melbourne (A$$$$) AGSM (A$$$$) Kellogg '23 (WL) Said '22 (A$$$$) CBS '23 (D) Booth '23 (WA) Anderson '23 (WA) Cambridge '22 (WL) LBS '23 (D) Stern '24 (WA)
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 1,064
Kudos: 2,325
 [1]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 09 Oct 2019, 17:36
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C: any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections, such as the fourth amendment, will systematically supress dissent

dissent = opinions

Prem: American revolution rose partly in response to british search warrants to abitrary and intrusive powers.
Prem: 5th amendmend created to protect against unreasonable and warrantless intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government
prem: Dictators used arbitrary and intru surveillance to monitor and supres dissidents

Weaken
A shows an example against
B false
C shows example of when it is used in democracies, but this does not serve to argue against the claim that this will be imposed systematically- it merely highlights
the fact the government has the power to supress whenever they want e.g. during times of war
D false
E supports argument
User avatar
Shikhar22
User avatar
Joined: 08 Mar 2021
Last visit: 28 Oct 2025
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
56
 [1]
Given Kudos: 304
Posts: 134
Kudos: 56
 [1]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 23 Mar 2021, 17:11
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But how can we say that Uk is a democracy or not. How can we assume that fact?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Shikhar22
User avatar
Joined: 08 Mar 2021
Last visit: 28 Oct 2025
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
56
Given Kudos: 304
Posts: 134
Kudos: 56
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 23 Mar 2021, 17:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mvictor
dancinggeometry
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

took me some time to understand what suppress dissent actually means.
since we are talking that any democracy that DOES not enforce... will suppress dissent.
we need an answer that would prove that the above is wrong.

Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

(A) The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
ok, so we have an example of democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections. moreover, UK has never suppressed dissent. this is a clear weakener.

(B) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
well, good for them, but this doesn't actually weaken the argument.

(C) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
tempting one. Nevertheless, incorrect one. we are talking about enforcing equally extensive protections, and that by not doing this, the country will suppress dissent. this one is an iSWAT. during war - is not something we are interested.

(D) Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
good for them, but doesn't weaken the argument.

(E) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
well, again, not a weakener.
Show more


But, how can we assume that UK is a democracy. Is that okay to assume? Without explicitly told in the given text?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
MBAB123
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Last visit: 30 Jul 2023
Posts: 563
Own Kudos:
318
 [1]
Given Kudos: 151
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 563
Kudos: 318
 [1]
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 23 Mar 2021, 21:49
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shikhar22
mvictor
dancinggeometry
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

took me some time to understand what suppress dissent actually means.
since we are talking that any democracy that DOES not enforce... will suppress dissent.
we need an answer that would prove that the above is wrong.

Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

(A) The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
ok, so we have an example of democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections. moreover, UK has never suppressed dissent. this is a clear weakener.

(B) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
well, good for them, but this doesn't actually weaken the argument.

(C) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
tempting one. Nevertheless, incorrect one. we are talking about enforcing equally extensive protections, and that by not doing this, the country will suppress dissent. this one is an iSWAT. during war - is not something we are interested.

(D) Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
good for them, but doesn't weaken the argument.

(E) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
well, again, not a weakener.


But, how can we assume that UK is a democracy. Is that okay to assume? Without explicitly told in the given text?

Posted from my mobile device
Show more

I'm guessing having a parliamentary system implies democracy? I am really not sure though.
avatar
shubham19121993
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Jun 2021
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 22 May 2021, 01:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
dancinggeometry
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the 20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents. Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent.

Which of the following, if true, best weakens the argument?

(A) The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically suppressed dissent.
(B) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
(C) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of war.
(D) Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
(E) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



This argument states that the United States created the Fourth Amendment to protect against unreasonable intrusions. It observes that such intrusions are often committed by dictatorships. It then makes a rather sweeping conclusion that any country without similar protections will suppress dissent. Such a broad conclusion could be weakened by citing one case in which that pattern does not hold.

(A) CORRECT. This choice cites a country without such protections that does not suppress dissent. One example weakens the conclusion, which said no country would refrain from suppressing dissent without such protections.

(B) This choice is irrelevant, as the conclusion does not address the effectiveness of different types of government. In fact, as it is limited to democracies; any information about dictatorships is irrelevant.

(C) This choice does not weaken the argument. The conclusion said “systematically suppress dissent” and this statement talks about “haphazard” suppression under special circumstances. Furthermore, we do not know if these democracies had equally extensive protections.

(D) Whether or not the United States supported a dictatorship is irrelevant to the conclusion that democracies without extensive protections will eventually suppress dissent.

(E) This choice, if anything, strengthens the argument. It presents the example of democracies without such protections that do suppress dissent.
Show more

But for option A...nowhere is mentioned that UK is a democracy.......The conclusion talks about democracies not any nation ..Kindly clarify.
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
User avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
46
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 03 Jul 2022, 02:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi expert,
I was confused by the OE. I narrow down to A and E, but in A, how we can know United Kingdom’s parliamentary system is a democratic system?
And in E, how we can know Soviet Union does not enforce equally extensive protections?
Need your ideas and thanks.
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
536
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 536
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 03 Jul 2022, 05:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
Hi expert,
I was confused by the OE. I narrow down to A and E, but in A, how we can know United Kingdom’s parliamentary system is a democratic system?
And in E, how we can know Soviet Union does not enforce equally extensive protections?
Need your ideas and thanks.
Show more

I believe a parliament is definitionally democratic. It's a specific kind of democracy.

As for E, we don't know the countries in the Soviet Union do not enforce equally extensive protections. But remember what we're looking for: we want to show that a country without these protections does not HAVE to suppress dissent. (NOTE: We don't need to show that every country that DOES have these protections DOES NOT suppress dissent).

So if a country mentioned in E *does* have these protections and still suppresses dissent, that is actually not relevant to our conclusion. If these countries do not have these protections and suppress dissent, that *strengthens* our conclusion, and we are trying to weaken it.
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
User avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
46
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 03 Jul 2022, 08:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ReedArnoldMPREP
Mavisdu1017
Hi expert,
I was confused by the OE. I narrow down to A and E, but in A, how we can know United Kingdom’s parliamentary system is a democratic system?
And in E, how we can know Soviet Union does not enforce equally extensive protections?
Need your ideas and thanks.

I believe a parliament is definitionally democratic. It's a specific kind of democracy.

As for E, we don't know the countries in the Soviet Union do not enforce equally extensive protections. But remember what we're looking for: we want to show that a country without these protections does not HAVE to suppress dissent. (NOTE: We don't need to show that every country that DOES have these protections DOES NOT suppress dissent).

So if a country mentioned in E *does* have these protections and still suppresses dissent, that is actually not relevant to our conclusion. If these countries do not have these protections and suppress dissent, that *strengthens* our conclusion, and we are trying to weaken it.
Show more
Yes sir, thanks for your explanation and I understand your logic, but what confused me is how can I know whether a country has such protection, cuz it doesn’t say explicitly in the choice and only say a country’s name...but I think it is not an official question, so I won’t get tangled too much.
User avatar
resilient369
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2024
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
9
Given Kudos: 220
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 7.8
Posts: 14
Kudos: 9
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general se 17 Aug 2024, 09:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
if in united kingdom the power of intrusive and warrantless searches are not present therefore it never suppressed dissent, then option A doesn't weaken the argument.

If the UK doesn’t actually have arbitrary and intrusive powers akin to those the argument is criticizing, then this option might not address the core issue about surveillance and dissent suppression effectively.­
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts