Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 15:30 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 15:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
dmc5280
Joined: 19 May 2012
Last visit: 14 Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
dmc5280
Joined: 19 May 2012
Last visit: 14 Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can't thank you enough for your input. I really needed some independent feedback. You've given me a lot to think about.

Thank you!
avatar
pcwcecac
Joined: 08 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 May 2012
Posts: 10
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Alex,

Thank you very much for your feedback last time. My profile has changed quite significantly (thanks to your suggestion).

My main question now is whether to apply this fall/winter or next

Updated profile:

Schooling: MA/BSc in Math. Econ from UCLA. Graduated 2010 with both degrees
GPA: 3.65
GMAT: 770 AWA 5.5 (official score)

Worked at the Federal Reserve Board as a quant. oriented research assistant. Aug2010-April2012

Working at the McKinsey Global Institute as a research fellow. The position is unique in that I do not provide research support. Rather, I'm staffed on a team of 4 to 5 associates and business analysts to co-author publishable reports. My role on the team is to provide expertise on global financial markets, while other team members provide insight on their practice areas. Once the report is sent out for publication, I'm drafted onto a new team to produce a new report.

On the side, I serve as a policy adviser for a LA mayoral candidate. I try to provide sharp but accessible analysis of issues that will catch voters' attention (particularly Latino votes). The aim is to demonstrate that our campaign has the brain power to put structure on complex issues and provide solution that the Latino community can relate to.

My end goal is to return to McKinsey. I would really like to attend one of the top 8 schools.

Ideally, I would like to apply this winter. But there are benefits to waiting one more year.

What do you think my chances are at the top 8 programs if I apply this year versus the next?

Thank you very much for your time.
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Look, if you really really want to apply, go for it, rather than looking to me or anyone else for reaffirmation. It sounds like you're in a huge rush, and you probably can't wait a year no matter what anyone tells you (I mean, you say your profile has changed significantly and it's barely been a few months - which to be blunt only reveals that you probably need a bit more experience under your belt; real change is measured in years, not just months, especially when you've had a bit more perspective). Again you've just *started* these new things - rather than looking too far ahead, how about just focusing on the things you've just *started* recently?
avatar
pcwcecac
Joined: 08 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 May 2012
Posts: 10
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Alex,

I appreciate your honestly, and that's exactly what I sought. I had the impression that the new brand name and the political involvement would answer some questions about teamwork and leadership. Your perspective makes sense.

The rush is coming from my deferring a near full ride to a top law school, and needing to reconfirm my intent to enroll by February, 2013. I would like to weigh my MBA prospects with that existing offer.

I would prefer to go to a top MBA program rather than a top law program. But I would have to give up what's concretely in front of me if I were to wait on the MBA application

I appreciate your honesty. I feel like I can always count on it. I'm very interested on any additional input, as long as you're willing to give it.

Thanks very much
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You're in a great place right now: a great job at a top firm, and invaluable political experience. And you're still young.

This is just my personal opinion, but you may have dodged a bullet by not going to law school (that is, if you are not going to law school after all).

I don't know too many lawyers who are happy or satisfied. The work can be miserable, no matter what kind of law you practice.

And it really boils down to one thing:

More than any other profession, law is about seeing the glass half empty, whereas most professions are about seeing the glass as half full: in business, you are working on boosting sales and growing a company. In medicine, you are hoping to save a life (or to make someone better). In engineering, you're building something (not destroying it). Even in the military, you are fighting in order to bring peace.

But in law, your job is to identify and prevent problems. You're looking at the negative. You spend 3 years in law school learning how to think like a lawyer: so that in the real world you know how to do two things as a lawyer -- identify the legal issue in a situation, and find a legal solution to prevent the issue from blowing up. It's oriented toward damage control. You're looking to *protect* your clients - it's defensive. And that kind of negative angle can wear down just about anyone. More than any other profession, it brings out the worst in a person's cynicism and jadedness. Maybe only law enforcement or being a corrections officer is worse (and it's not like the quality of life for law enforcement officers is that great).

Corporate law (the most popular and highest paying) is so dull you'll die from a thousand paper cuts. It's drudgery and makes you hate life. Trademark/IP can be interesting, but the malpractice insurance you'd pay is so sky high and where your clients misuse litigation as a business strategy that you'd secretly wish the Chinese would pirate everything and cause your clients to go bankrupt. Estate/family law means you'll be dealing with divorces, custody battles, and rich kids fighting over their dead parent's money. Litigation requires an almost sociopathic streak (they probably have the most dismal view of human behavior of anyone).

Again as a client - you only hire a lawyer when you have a problem, or when you want to prevent a problem from happening.

Plus, the legal market is stagnant. Maybe even declining. The job market sucks for law, and will likely continue to suck.

My advice for you is to just focus on what you have now, and take it a step at a time. If b-school is in the cards for you in the future, then great. If not, no big deal because you already have a strong foundation for your career.

But don't go into law school unless you are ABSOLUTELY sure you want to practice law, and you know what you're getting yourself into. Again, the career satisfaction rates for lawyers are amongst the lowest of any white collar profession (at least in the US).

Damn, even talking about the law makes this whole post negative.
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quick thing: only potential positive about the law is if you're looking for a career in politics. But then again, some folks would rather sweep floors than become elected officials :-)
avatar
pcwcecac
Joined: 08 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 May 2012
Posts: 10
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you spending the time to write all of that. I will give it some thought.

My passion lies in problem solving. I'm afraid law might not satisfy that need. On that basis alone, I think I have my answer. The rest is just finding the courage to walk away from that offer. On the bright side, it gives me something extra to write about on my essays.

You've been extremely helpful and generous. I really appreciate your guidance.
avatar
DankTank
Joined: 25 May 2012
Last visit: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE:Operations (Military & Defense)
Posts: 2
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMAT: None officially but I've taken the official practice GMAT (680 and 710)
Undergrad GPA: 2.7 from US Air Force Academy
MS in General Mgt: 3.92 from Central Michigan U.
Current Occupation: Project Manager in Semi-Conductor industry in Bay area, CA
Previous Occupation: 5 years Nuclear weapons officer (Left service as Captain)
Applying to: Berkeley, Stanford, UCLA, and USC

Career Goal: I'd like to stay in the semi-conductor or tech industry in Northern California. Stay in operations and move up to exec level someday.

Primary Concerns:
Low GPA obviously... that stands out the most in my resume and I'm really kicking myself for not trying harder in college. I had a difficult time balancing everything at a military academy. It's funny because I was able to excel at only one aspect of the trifecta (Military, Academics, Physical fitness) per semester, so my college transcript shows spikes in different areas throughout all 4 years. I did manage to finish a MS during my military career to try to make up for my poor undergrad GPA. I have tons of extracarricular activities which I did not mention here but is on par with what the other military members have mentioned. My leadership experience is probably different from the others in that I managed other officers(~220 in my wing) instead of the typical officer to enlisted relationship.

What GMAT score do I need to hit to offset my weaknesses? Is there anything else you reccommend besides excellent reccomendations and essays? I have 1 year of corporate experience in my current project management position. I was torn about pursuing an MBA because I am in a good position to move up in my company and my pay is very satisfying but I feel like I will hit a ceiling later. Any advice is appreciated. Thank you.
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
601
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here's what you should do:

(1) Shoot for a 700+ GMAT, and ideally a 720+ GMAT. That is what adcoms expect at the schools you're looking at. They will cut you some slack for your undergrad GPA (not uncommon for military officers to have lower GPAs), but that means you really should have a strong GMAT to make up for it. Yes you did well in your masters, but the GMAT is still the primary metric they will look at.

(2) Apply to the schools you listed this year. If you do get in, then you can decide later whether it's worth it (especially if you continue to grow in your current company). If you don't get in, as you said you're in a good place, so you are in a position to apply for the part-time or exec programs. The good thing about these California schools is that three of them have the strongest part-time programs in the country (Haas, UCLA, USC -- the other top tier P/T programs are Kellogg, Booth and NYU), and Stanford offers the 1-year Sloan program (a full-time executive masters that is sort of like an exec MBA).

In short, in your case it's about the GMAT and strong execution on your written applications and interview - and you should have a reasonable shot at the schools you listed.
avatar
DankTank
Joined: 25 May 2012
Last visit: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Operations, General Management
WE:Operations (Military & Defense)
Posts: 2
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thank you for your reply alex... I will take the GMAT and re-examine my options. I still feel like most of these schools are long shots but never hurts to try.
User avatar
EmBeeAy23
Joined: 18 Nov 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2017
Posts: 153
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
Posts: 153
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fantastic points Alex. This serves to reinforce my predicament (only took GMAT once and scored a 730, contemplating a re-take but will probably not serve me well with the time I spend studying rather than writing essays or visiting schools).

I was a bit surprised to read "You don't have to visit every single school you're applying to." Is it common to apply to a school in a different region and make it all the way to an acceptance offer without having ever stepped foot on the campus? (Whether it be tours or through a campus interview).

Can you share some insight on which round one should apply to and how many schools is too many? For example, I'm currently looking to apply to about 5 schools but is it out of this world to tack on an additional 2? Do I apply R1 for all of my reach schools and R2 for the more realistic targets? I'm a bit confused as to how to segment the schools with the different rounds.
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A NEW MODEL FOR ADMISSIONS (LESS ESSAYS)

With Wharton recently experimenting with a group-based exercise, UCLA requiring a video/audio essay (2 years ago), and now HBS changing it up, there's only going to be more school I believe that will continue to move away from the old model of long essays--> interview --> decision

In fact, I think they can (and likely will) move towards the following model:
1. Resume + simple application form (demographic info, test scores, GPA)
2. Interview + short essays (questions that are meant to reveal what cannot be reasonably inferred from the resume/profile alone)
3. Two or three recommendation letters
4. Decision

I don't think adcoms need essays or rec letters from EVERY applicant. At top schools, they can pretty much identify the top third to top half based on the resume/profile alone (and for those who aren't in the top third to top half, there's no need to waste the time of the adcoms, applicants, or recommenders on the essays and rec letters). Adcoms are trying to build a diverse class based on demographics and pre-MBA professional backgrounds - they are divvying up the applications into groups as it is, so it's not that hard most of the time to identify the top third to top half based on resume/profile alone.

And then once they've identified the top third to top half - they invite these folks for an interview (or interviews) and to write short essay questions that are only given to them once they've been invited. And since only a subset of the applicants are invited to write the essays, the adcoms can provide a different set of essay questions to different applicant groups (i.e. traditional applicants or those from "crowded" demographics are given a set of questions that will be different than the questions being asked those non-traditional professional backgrounds and/or underrepresented demographics - and this will allow the adcoms to more effectively evaluate subjective info from applicants based on their backgrounds).

And then only ask for reference letters once they've weeded out those from the interview/essays. The majority of the time, the rec letters won't make a difference either way, and it's really just to uncover any potential "gotchas" or info about the applicant that may be incongruous with what the adcom has seen so far. The rec letter in a way is a "human" background check to complement the standard background checks they will do on admitted students.

This kind of process I don't think will require more resources or time from the adcoms (in fact, it may be less) -- and it's a more efficient and effective way to evaluate applicants (and saving the applicants time as well - giving them more chances to apply to more schools, which will benefit all b-schools as they see applications rise since more applicants will "punt" if there are no essays required for the initial round).
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A QUICK NOTE ON THE HBS POST-INTERVIEW ESSAY

A lot of people will fall into this trap of trying to pre-write the essay. DO NOT DO THIS.

That's why they are asking this essay in the first place. They want to know how you follow up based on what happened in the interview.

Adcoms can sense pretty quickly if something is pre-written: it's either too vague and generic, or it's covering material in such a decorated and stage managed way that it's obvious someone spent way too much time trying to manicure every single sentence and to contrive an example that had nothing to do with what happened in the interview.

A strong post-interview essay is one that directly responds to or is a follow up to what was discussed in the interview.

And you have no real way of figuring out what that will be. Sure, you can do interview coaching (and you probably should - if not with a consultant, at least practice mock interviews with colleagues and friends), some folks may tell others what their HBS adcoms had asked them and so forth. But it's not about that. It's about the nature of the discussion and what you actually said in the interview - and more importantly, how the adcom responded to some of the moments in the interview as you were talking about yourself. There is no way of predicting how an individual will respond to you, or to even know in advance beyond just a vague idea of how the actual moment-to-moment experience will be like in that interview room.

Finally, too many people are stressing out about this post-interview essay. The thing is, it's not going to really matter for 99.9% of the folks who actually get interviewed. The decision is basically made based on the interview itself - no "mini essay" afterwards is really going to change their mind if they already liked you, or they thought you were a tool. It's something they instituted this year - and it's an experiment. If it doesn't really impact their decision making, it will be gone (or significantly changed) next year. Again, this year is an experimental year for HBS - they are trying to change the format in which they assess people, and so they are keeping an open mind about the process. Having said that, in my opinion I think the importance that many applicants seem to put on this post-interview essay is overblown.

In short, what HBS is basically saying this year is that the two biggest things that matter are: your resume and your interview performance. The essays and rec letters are minor and likely won't be a huge factor for most applicants. In other words, HBS adcoms believe that for many applicants, they can pretty much figure out whom they want to interview based on the resume alone (and the essays won't matter much unless they really suck). And that for most of the people that get invited for an interview - they can figure out based on the interview performance alone whom they want to admit.
avatar
supax
Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Last visit: 01 Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.59
WE:Accounting (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 4
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Alex, I've been reading your posts and they are by far the best quality out of the consultants on gmatclub as you give a direct, no frill answer and are unafraid to hurt applicants feelings. I'm wondering if I can get a profile evaluation, hopefully this wont take more than 5 minutes of your time.

Ethnicity: Asian American Male
Age : 26
Gmat: 710
Undergraduate: UC Berkeley 3.59 GPA Business Administration

Work Experience:
3 yrs - City and County of San Francisco as an accountant - working on department budget in the Controller's Office, general ledger, compliance, grants at department of public health, medical cost reimbursements
0-1 yrs - Big 4 as an Audit Associate (unfortunately laid off) - tech firm audits

ECs/ Tid bits:
CPA
2 yrs - Created a stock blog as a hobby - was marginally profitable
1 yrs - Was webmaster for the California Investment Association at UC Berkeley
1 yrs - Historian at Asian American Association at UC Berkeley
Study Abroad for a year in Japan, interned at Robert Half
Boy Scout of America Eagle Scout

Post MBA Goal: Become a budget analyst for governmental institution to help higher education retain funding.
Long-term Goal: Become a budget director of a university school system and structure pension and health care benefits

Stretch: Columbia, Northwestern
Target: Michigan, Duke, Yale, NYU
Safety: Haven't given it too much thought.


Thanks so much!
User avatar
AlexMBAApply
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Last visit: 07 Aug 2025
Posts: 2,458
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,458
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
supax
Hi Alex, I've been reading your posts and they are by far the best quality out of the consultants on gmatclub as you give a direct, no frill answer and are unafraid to hurt applicants feelings. I'm wondering if I can get a profile evaluation, hopefully this wont take more than 5 minutes of your time.

Ethnicity: Asian American Male
Age : 26
Gmat: 710
Undergraduate: UC Berkeley 3.59 GPA Business Administration

Work Experience:
3 yrs - City and County of San Francisco as an accountant - working on department budget in the Controller's Office, general ledger, compliance, grants at department of public health, medical cost reimbursements
0-1 yrs - Big 4 as an Audit Associate (unfortunately laid off) - tech firm audits

ECs/ Tid bits:
CPA
2 yrs - Created a stock blog as a hobby - was marginally profitable
1 yrs - Was webmaster for the California Investment Association at UC Berkeley
1 yrs - Historian at Asian American Association at UC Berkeley
Study Abroad for a year in Japan, interned at Robert Half
Boy Scout of America Eagle Scout

Post MBA Goal: Become a budget analyst for governmental institution to help higher education retain funding.
Long-term Goal: Become a budget director of a university school system and structure pension and health care benefits

Stretch: Columbia, Northwestern
Target: Michigan, Duke, Yale, NYU
Safety: Haven't given it too much thought.


Thanks so much!

With your school choices (or absence of any CA schools), it seems like you're trying to get the hell out of California, aren't you? :)

Anyhow, I think your expectations are realistic; you're right that the top 8 are stretches, and top 16 are sweet spots. Safeties would be outside the top 16 - whether you feel it's worth it or not is really a personal decision.

Two things you may want to keep in mind:

1) Career goals: adcoms may question why you are doing an MBA given your goals; with your accounting background, what may make more sense is an MPA or MPP. In other words, if these are your *real* goals, you may have to come up with an alternate career path that may be more traditional (consulting, financial services, corporate, etc), and then it's a judgment call as to what you decide to go with in the essays and interviews. And if it's simply narrative (you are saying this because you think the adcoms will find it impressive) - then ditch it, because if it's just narrative, it will come across that way (it's simply not going to come across as authentic in an essay because you don't believe in it). In any case, even if they're your real goals, I'm sure you probably have other job options post-MBA you're thinking of as well.

2) Work experience: focus more on team stuff and what you learned about group dynamics in your job. The technical/analytical work is boring to talk about (not just because it's accounting; just about *any* job's technical aspects are boring for anyone other than those in one's own industry - whether it's engineering, finance, tax, consulting, law, etc. But people are not boring. And in your case, being a budget guy in California's dysfunctional state government, I'm sure you have plenty of stories and cautionary tales and lessons learned about group dynamics and how political "accounting" and "budgets" can be - and how that impacts your own job responsibilities/tasks as well as how you deal with people in your workplace.
User avatar
umeranyth
Joined: 17 May 2011
Last visit: 15 Feb 2026
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
--
User avatar
Two64
Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Last visit: 27 Jun 2016
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q45 V38
GPA: 2.64
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consumer Electronics)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q45 V38
Posts: 140
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Alex, just wanted to know if I'm a bit too ambitious in my school selections (stats and targets below). Which schools would be "sweet spots?"

Also, is it always better to apply RD1? I've been reading that some programs offer better chances if you submit your app during Round 2 due to them being ready to "round out" the class. Just reread all 8 pages. Thanks again for your commitment to this thread.
   1  ...  6   7   8   9   10  ...  24