Last visit was: 24 Jul 2024, 04:50 It is currently 24 Jul 2024, 04:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 555-605 Level,   Long Passage,   Social Science,                  
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6991
Own Kudos [?]: 64576 [2]
Given Kudos: 1824
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1346
Own Kudos [?]: 857 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6991
Own Kudos [?]: 64576 [2]
Given Kudos: 1824
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4426
Own Kudos [?]: 31330 [4]
Given Kudos: 642
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Question 2 seems to have stumped a lot of folks, so let me try my hand at this one.


2. In using the word “understandable” (line 14), the author most clearly conveys

(A) sympathy with attempts by the Brotherhood between 1925 and 1935 to establish an independent union
(B) concern that the obstacles faced by Randolph between 1925 and 1935 were indeed formidable
(C) ambivalence about the significance of unions to most Black workers in the 1920’s
(D) appreciation of the attitude of many Black workers in the 1920’s toward unions
(E) regret at the historical attitude of unions toward Black workers


This is a function/purpose question. Why did the author use the word "understandable" here?

Excerpt from the passage:
In the Pullman contest Randolph faced formidable obstacles.The first was Black workers' understandable skepticism toward unions, which had historically barred Black workers from membership. An additional obstacle was the union that Pullman itself had formed, which weakened support among Black workers for an independent entity.

What does the author achieve by using the word "understandable"?

Through this word, the author indicates to us that as per him/her, the skepticism that black workers had towards unions is something he/she can understand. This means that the author understands where this skepticism is coming from, and so as per him/her, the skepticism is justified at some level (if you do not understand the reason for the skepticism, you would feel it is not justified, you cannot appreciate it).

Without this word, we would not know the author's opinion about the skeptical attitude. Does he agree with it, or disagree with it? Through "understandable", the author indicates that yes, this skepticism is definitely justified at some level, and so, it is therefore something that he/she appreciates. Option D is therefore the correct answer.

Useful practice: When trying to find the purpose of a word, remove it and see what happens. How does the meaning change without the word? It will give a clue as to why the word is there.


Regards,
Harsha
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 44
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
Hi VeritasKarishma GMATNinja AjiteshArun

Q4. The passage suggests that if the grievances of porters in one part of the United States had been different from those of porters in another part of the country, which of the following would have been the case?

(A) It would have been more difficult for the Pullman Company to have had a single labor policy.
(B) It would have been more difficult for the Brotherhood to control its channels of communication.
(C) It would have been more difficult for the Brotherhood to build its membership.
(D) It would have been easier for the Pullman Company's union to attract membership.
(E) It would have been easier for the Brotherhood to threaten strikes.

I chose option B, because of the below sentence-
"their segregated life protected the union's internal communications from interception."
Can you please help me in understanding where am i going wrong ?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5340
Own Kudos [?]: 4747 [1]
Given Kudos: 666
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
tt147 wrote:
Hi VeritasKarishma GMATNinja AjiteshArun

Q4. The passage suggests that if the grievances of porters in one part of the United States had been different from those of porters in another part of the country, which of the following would have been the case?

(A) It would have been more difficult for the Pullman Company to have had a single labor policy.
(B) It would have been more difficult for the Brotherhood to control its channels of communication.
(C) It would have been more difficult for the Brotherhood to build its membership.
(D) It would have been easier for the Pullman Company's union to attract membership.
(E) It would have been easier for the Brotherhood to threaten strikes.

I chose option B, because of the below sentence-
"their segregated life protected the union's internal communications from interception."
Can you please help me in understanding where am i going wrong ?

Hi tt147,

That point appears to be for something else in the passage.

vscid wrote:
In addition, the porters' very isolation aided the Brotherhood. Porters were scattered throughout the country, sleeping in dormitories in Black communities; their segregated life protected the union's internal communications from interception.

Q4 (The passage suggests that if the grievances of porters in one part of the United States had been different from those of porters in another part of the country, which of the following would have been the case?) is about the next point.

vscid wrote:
That the porters were a homogeneous group working for a single employer with a single labor policy, thus sharing the same grievances from city to city, also strengthened the Brotherhood and encouraged racial identity and solidarity as well.

We can say that if they didn't share the same grievances the Brotherhood would not have had this advantage, but we can't say anything about their communications on the basis of this point.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
For Q6, I was thinking C. Wasn't that the ultimate outcome ? Is some word playing trick here ?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6991
Own Kudos [?]: 64576 [0]
Given Kudos: 1824
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
Expert Reply

Question 6


AGRpr wrote:
For Q6, I was thinking C. Wasn't that the ultimate outcome ? Is some word playing trick here ?

Question 6 asks which of the answer choices is addressed by the passage. With that in mind, here’s (C):

Quote:
(C) The influence he (Randolph) had on the passage of legislation overturning race restrictions in 1944

The passage mentions the overturning of race restrictions in the final sentence. It says, “such restrictions were eventually found unconstitutional in 1944.” The problem is that the constitutionality of race restrictions has nothing to do with Randolph’s influence. It’s merely related to the restrictions and the constitution itself.

Also, it’s not clear, based on the passage, that legislation was passed in order to overturn race restrictions in 1944. It’s equally plausible that courts simply found current restrictions unconstitutional. For those two reasons, we can eliminate (C).

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2021
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
Can anyone please explain why Option A for Question 6 is wrong? I feel like Original answer option B is specific to last paragraph where American labour is involveed. Isnt option B kinda ignoring all the efforts, obstacles Randolph faced in above passages, like I mean this option is only focussing on This American Labour thing
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5340
Own Kudos [?]: 4747 [1]
Given Kudos: 666
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
JaxHammer wrote:
Can anyone please explain why Option A for Question 6 is wrong? I feel like Original answer option B is specific to last paragraph where American labour is involveed. Isnt option B kinda ignoring all the efforts, obstacles Randolph faced in above passages, like I mean this option is only focussing on This American Labour thing

Hi JaxHammer,

The passage doesn't mention anything about "the steps he took to initiate the founding of the Brotherhood". It starts with "When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters", and then moves on to what he did next.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 230
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 139
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
Dear experts,

I don't understand and am not convinced with OA in Q2 and Q6
I read all comments but I am not convinced with those answer.

Q2
2. In using the word ???understandable??? (line 14), the author most clearly conveys

(A) sympathy with attempts by the Brotherhood between 1925 and 1935 to establish an independent union
(B) concern that the obstacles faced by Randolph between 1925 and 1935 were indeed formidable
(C) ambivalence about the significance of unions to most Black workers in the 1920???s
(D) appreciation of the attitude of many Black workers in the 1920???s toward unions
(E) regret at the historical attitude of unions toward Black workers

How and why "understandable" can be conveyed "appreciation" ?

6. The passage supplies information concerning which of the following matters related to Randolph?

(A) The steps he took to initiate the founding of the Brotherhood
(B) His motivation for bringing the Brotherhood into the American Federation of Labor
(C) The influence he had on the passage of legislation overturning race restrictions in 1944
(D) The influence he had on the passage of legislation to bar companies from financing their own unions
(E) The success he and the Brotherhood had in influencing the policies of the other unions in the American Federation of Labor

I'm still not convinced with (B)..

Which sentences in the passage does show the motivation of Randolph??
Also, what does the scope of "motivation"? There is no any reason or any background provided in the passage that explain why Randolph did in the passage
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos [?]: 510 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
How and why "understandable" can be conveyed "appreciation" ?


One of the primary meanings of "appreciation" is "full/deep/intuitive understanding (of a concept or point of view)".
E.g., Many people do not appreciate the importance of a supportive family until they have weathered a crisis without having such support readily available.

This is the meaning of "appreciate" that's used here.

("Appreciate" can also mean "to increase in value"—e.g., for a stock or other investment—but I doubt there's any risk that you'll confuse this meaning with others.
If you were thinking of the way you'd use "appreciate" in exchanging courtesies—e.g., Thank you for the favor; I really appreciate it—I think it's somewhat less likely that you'll see this form in formal writing; you'll probably see some other, more formally acceptable equivalent instead, e.g., is/are grateful for....)
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos [?]: 510 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
6. I'm still not convinced with (B)..


From the last paragraph:
Randolph brought the Brotherhood into the American Federation of Labor, where it became the equal of the Federation's 105 other unions. He reasoned that as a member union, the Brotherhood would be in a better position to exert pressure on member unions that practiced race restrictions

where the colors mean...
Randolph brought the Brotherhood into the AFL.
His reasoning for doing so was THIS.

Here, you just need to realize that "He reasoned that..." is going to be followed by the person's reasoning for whatever was just stated.
(If a sentence contains an open-ended reference, then the necessary specifics will be found in an immediately neighboring sentence. This is pretty much common-sense deduction: If the required reference were any farther away, there'd be nothing to point you to it!)

Reasons for doing something and motivation to do something, for professional actions, are substantively the same. (For highly personal choices, these could differ—with "motivation" referring more to deep emotional drives, as opposed to "reasons" which would mean what it always does. In professional/strategic contexts such as the one here, though—with deep personal emotions not in play—they're basically the same set of driving forces.)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Mar 2022
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: Georgia
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
Hi,

I completely misunderstand this one. Can any expert help me understand this?

"But it was only in the early 1930's that federal legislation prohibiting a company from maintaining its own unions with company money eventually allowed the Brotherhood to become recognized as the porters' representative."

As per my understanding this means that pre-1930's federal legislation prohibited companies from maintaining unions with company money and in the early 1930's they lifted this prohibition.

According to this, in 1920s the companies could not keep unions using using own funds, so OA to Q5 is dubious. Is it so or am I crazy?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6991
Own Kudos [?]: 64576 [1]
Given Kudos: 1824
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply

Question 5


Paagrio wrote:
Hi,

I completely misunderstand this one. Can any expert help me understand this?

"But it was only in the early 1930's that federal legislation prohibiting a company from maintaining its own unions with company money eventually allowed the Brotherhood to become recognized as the porters' representative."

As per my understanding this means that pre-1930's federal legislation prohibited companies from maintaining unions with company money and in the early 1930's they lifted this prohibition.

According to this, in 1920s the companies could not keep unions using using own funds, so OA to Q5 is dubious. Is it so or am I crazy?

A prohibition was not lifted in the 1930's -- a prohibition was put in place in the 1930's. The 1930's legislation prohibited companies from funding their own unions.

That means that before the 1930's, companies WERE allowed to fund their own unions. So (A) is correct for question 5.

I hope that helps!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2022
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 1858
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
Hi MartyMurray DmitryFarber GMATNinja KarishmaB
Quote:
.. had formed, which weakened support among Black workers for an independent entity.
 

in Q3, How can we say from above line that they supported company's union before 1935, may be they were fine with company's union and didn't need the new union, but that doesn't mean they supported that. Can you please help me with this ?

For me, Answer is D. Am I correct ?

Thanks !­
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2701
Own Kudos [?]: 7863 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
 
SnorLax_7 wrote:
Hi MartyMurray DmitryFarber GMATNinja KarishmaB
Quote:
.. had formed, which weakened support among Black workers for an independent entity.
 

in Q3, How can we say from above line that they supported company's union before 1935, may be they were fine with company's union and didn't need the new union, but that doesn't mean they supported that. Can you please help me with this ?

For me, Answer is D. Am I correct ?

Thanks !­

­First, I think you know the answer to your final question. If you're disputing the answer to an official question and you ask "Am I correct?" the answer is surely no.  :geek:

The idea in this case is that many workers didn't want an independent union because they already had one provided by the company. This means that at least some workers preferred the company union over an outside one. That's a form of support for the existing company union. 

As for D, it's impossible, since by 1935 the company union no longer existed. The passage tells us that it was made illegal in the early 30's, and in 1935 the Brotherhood was recognized instead. So there was no Pullman Company union for people to respond positively to after 1935.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: When A. Philip Randolph assumed the leadership of the Brotherhood of [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6991 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14064 posts