Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Gmatsaiyan
Posts: 754
Updated on: 10 Mar 2021, 01:55
Originally posted by Gmatsaiyan on 08 Aug 2020, 21:23.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 10 Mar 2021, 01:55, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 10 Mar 2021, 01:55, edited 1 time in total.
Updated
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
93% (03:07) correct
7%
(02:50) wrong
based on 223
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
42% (02:03) correct 58%
(01:57) wrong
based on 245
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
84% (00:52) correct 16%
(01:09) wrong
based on 230
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
When I became fascinated by the philosophical problem of personal identity , I also became dismayed by the unwillingness or inability of many writers on the subject to address the question of just why the problem should concern us at all.Rather than being an necessary and sufficient conditions for identifying one person as the same object at two different points in time.
So even as I worked on a PhD on the subject, located within the Anglo-American analytic tradition, I sneaked kierkegaard in through the back door. For me, Kierkegaard defined the problem more clearly than anyone else. Human beings are caught,he said , between two modes or "spheres" of existence. The "aesthetic"is the world of immediacy. Of here and now.The "ethical" is the transcendent,eternal world.We cant live both,but neither fulfills our needs since "the self is composed of infinitude and finitude", a perhaps hyperbolic way of saying that we exist across time,in the past and future, but we are also inescapably trapped in the present moment.
The limitations of the "ethical" are perhaps most obvious tot he modern mind.The life of eternity is just an illusion,for we are all too mortal,flesh and blood creatures. To believe we belong there is to live in denial of our animality. So the world has increasingly embraced the aesthetic. but this fails to satisfy us,too.If the moment is all we have,then all we can do is pursue pleasurable moments.ones that dissolve as swiftly as they appear,leaving us always running on empty,grasping at fleeting experiences that pass.The materialistic world offers innumerable opportunities for instant gratification without enduring satisfaction and so life becomes a series of diversions. no wonder there is still so much vague spiritual yearning in the west: people long for the ethical but cannot see beyond the aesthetic.
In evocative aphorisms,kierkegaard captured this sense of being lost, whichever world we choose:"infinitude's despair is to lack finitude, finitude's despair is to lack infinitude". Kierkegaard thus defined what I take to be the central puzzle of human existence: how to live in such a way that does justice to our aesthetic and our ethical natures.
So even as I worked on a PhD on the subject, located within the Anglo-American analytic tradition, I sneaked kierkegaard in through the back door. For me, Kierkegaard defined the problem more clearly than anyone else. Human beings are caught,he said , between two modes or "spheres" of existence. The "aesthetic"is the world of immediacy. Of here and now.The "ethical" is the transcendent,eternal world.We cant live both,but neither fulfills our needs since "the self is composed of infinitude and finitude", a perhaps hyperbolic way of saying that we exist across time,in the past and future, but we are also inescapably trapped in the present moment.
The limitations of the "ethical" are perhaps most obvious tot he modern mind.The life of eternity is just an illusion,for we are all too mortal,flesh and blood creatures. To believe we belong there is to live in denial of our animality. So the world has increasingly embraced the aesthetic. but this fails to satisfy us,too.If the moment is all we have,then all we can do is pursue pleasurable moments.ones that dissolve as swiftly as they appear,leaving us always running on empty,grasping at fleeting experiences that pass.The materialistic world offers innumerable opportunities for instant gratification without enduring satisfaction and so life becomes a series of diversions. no wonder there is still so much vague spiritual yearning in the west: people long for the ethical but cannot see beyond the aesthetic.
In evocative aphorisms,kierkegaard captured this sense of being lost, whichever world we choose:"infinitude's despair is to lack finitude, finitude's despair is to lack infinitude". Kierkegaard thus defined what I take to be the central puzzle of human existence: how to live in such a way that does justice to our aesthetic and our ethical natures.
Q1) The passage suggests that anyone attempting to evaluate existential choices must confront which of the following dichotomies?
A) The rhetoric of dialectics and the opacity of semiotics.
B) The subjective point of view and the objective point of view.
C) The aesthetic perspective and the religious perspective.
D) The evanescence of the aesthetic and the eternity of the ethical.
E) Only opacity of semiotics point of view.
A) The rhetoric of dialectics and the opacity of semiotics.
B) The subjective point of view and the objective point of view.
C) The aesthetic perspective and the religious perspective.
D) The evanescence of the aesthetic and the eternity of the ethical.
E) Only opacity of semiotics point of view.
Q2) All of the following statements can be logically inferred from the passage EXCEPT ?
a) The author is a research scholar in philosophy.
b)Kierkegaard is not an Anglo-American philosopher.
c) One can find remarkable spiritual enlightenment in the east.
d) Kierkegaard was a master of literary flourishes and wilful paradoxes.
e) In the context in which it appears "animality" most nearly means "being bestial".
A) a, d and e
B)b,c,d and e
C)b and c
D) Only e
E) a,b and d
a) The author is a research scholar in philosophy.
b)Kierkegaard is not an Anglo-American philosopher.
c) One can find remarkable spiritual enlightenment in the east.
d) Kierkegaard was a master of literary flourishes and wilful paradoxes.
e) In the context in which it appears "animality" most nearly means "being bestial".
A) a, d and e
B)b,c,d and e
C)b and c
D) Only e
E) a,b and d
Q3) It can be inferred that the "sense of being lost" (Highlighted) in the passage is being ascribed to
A) The unwillingness of people to take responsibility for their existential choices.
B) An inability to abandon aesthetics altogether in favor of the ethical.
C) an inability to strike an equilibrium between the aesthetic and the ethical.
D) the fluidity of social identities.
E) the sense of animality and opacity of semiotics.
A) The unwillingness of people to take responsibility for their existential choices.
B) An inability to abandon aesthetics altogether in favor of the ethical.
C) an inability to strike an equilibrium between the aesthetic and the ethical.
D) the fluidity of social identities.
E) the sense of animality and opacity of semiotics.
RC Butler 2021 - Practice Two RC Questions Everyday.
Passage # 107 Date: 17-Mar-2021
This question is a part of RC Butler 2021. Click here for Details
Passage # 107 Date: 17-Mar-2021
This question is a part of RC Butler 2021. Click here for Details
08 Aug 2020, 23:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
Q1) The passage suggests that anyone attempting to evaluate existential choices must confront which of the following dichotomies?
A) The rhetoric of dialectics and the opacity of semiotics.- Out of context
B) The subjective point of view and the objective point of view.- There is no discussion in passage about subjective and objective views.
C) The aesthetic perspective and the religious perspective.-No mention about religious perspective
D) The evanescence of the aesthetic and the eternity of the ethical.- Correct
E) Only opacity of semiotics point of view.-The passage is not solely concerned with semiotics.
Answer - D
Q2) All of the following statements can be logically inferred from the passage EXCEPT ?
a) The author is a research scholar in philosophy.- Can be inferred from the first line in second para.
b)Kierkegaard is not an Anglo-American philosopher.- Cannot be inferred.
c) One can find remarkable spiritual enlightenment in the east.- Cannot be inferred. The author only mentions lack of spirituality in west
d) Kierkegaard was a master of literary flourishes and wilful paradoxes.- Cannot be inferred
e) In the context in which it appears "animality" most nearly means "being bestial".- Cannot be inferred
A) a, d and e
B)b,c,d and e
C)b and c
D) Only e
E) a,b and d
Answer- B
Q3) It can be inferred that the "sense of being lost" mentioned in the passage is being ascribed to
A) The unwillingness of people to take responsibility for their existential choices.- The author does not discusses the idea of 'unwillingness of people to take responsibility for their existential choices'
B) An inability to abandon aesthetics altogether in favor of the ethical.- Author does not favour ethical nor abandons aesthetics.
C) an inability to strike an equilibrium between the aesthetic and the ethical. - Correct. The author is of the point of view that we cannot have strike an equilibrium.
D)the fluidity of social identities.- Out of context
E) the sense of animality and opacity of semiotics.- I passage is not concerned with these ideas at its centre.
Answer - D
A) The rhetoric of dialectics and the opacity of semiotics.- Out of context
B) The subjective point of view and the objective point of view.- There is no discussion in passage about subjective and objective views.
C) The aesthetic perspective and the religious perspective.-No mention about religious perspective
D) The evanescence of the aesthetic and the eternity of the ethical.- Correct
E) Only opacity of semiotics point of view.-The passage is not solely concerned with semiotics.
Answer - D
Q2) All of the following statements can be logically inferred from the passage EXCEPT ?
a) The author is a research scholar in philosophy.- Can be inferred from the first line in second para.
b)Kierkegaard is not an Anglo-American philosopher.- Cannot be inferred.
c) One can find remarkable spiritual enlightenment in the east.- Cannot be inferred. The author only mentions lack of spirituality in west
d) Kierkegaard was a master of literary flourishes and wilful paradoxes.- Cannot be inferred
e) In the context in which it appears "animality" most nearly means "being bestial".- Cannot be inferred
A) a, d and e
B)b,c,d and e
C)b and c
D) Only e
E) a,b and d
Answer- B
Q3) It can be inferred that the "sense of being lost" mentioned in the passage is being ascribed to
A) The unwillingness of people to take responsibility for their existential choices.- The author does not discusses the idea of 'unwillingness of people to take responsibility for their existential choices'
B) An inability to abandon aesthetics altogether in favor of the ethical.- Author does not favour ethical nor abandons aesthetics.
C) an inability to strike an equilibrium between the aesthetic and the ethical. - Correct. The author is of the point of view that we cannot have strike an equilibrium.
D)the fluidity of social identities.- Out of context
E) the sense of animality and opacity of semiotics.- I passage is not concerned with these ideas at its centre.
Answer - D
Moderators:
189 posts
