Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 20 Jul 2019, 17:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20, GMBA '20
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 06 May 2019, 00:55
3
5
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 195 sessions

51% (03:03) correct 49% (03:23) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 213 sessions

57% (00:46) correct 43% (00:44) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 207 sessions

40% (01:09) correct 60% (01:15) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 198 sessions

52% (01:17) correct 48% (01:30) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Passage # 178, Date : 30-APR-2019
This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019. Click here for Details


When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always tell my students that I absolutely believe in UFOs. After a brief pause for incredulous stares, I ask them to think about what the term UFO actually means. I explain that I fully believe there are objects in the sky that the average person may not be able to identify. This does not mean, however, that no one can identify these objects. It only means that they could appear 'unidentified' to someone who is not familiar with the sky or with the full range of sky phenomena that can surprise a novice. Indeed, upon more careful investigation, many so-called UFOs turn out to be perfectly natural objects or processes in the Earth's atmosphere or beyond. As the late Carl Sagan emphasized, 'Extraordinary hypotheses require extraordinary proof.' Surely, the notion that some mysterious phenomenon you briefly observed in the sky must be an interstellar spacecraft (and not a human craft, meteor, or a bright planet) qualifies as such an 'extra-ordinary' hypothesis! Yet, amazingly, given the number of UFO incidents believers report, not one UFO has left behind any proof - a piece of spacecraft material or machinery (or even a sandwich wrapper) that laboratory analysis has shown to be of clearly extraterrestrial origin. It's also remarkable how unlucky the UFO occupants are in their choice of people to kidnap. Never do 'aliens' seem to snatch a person with a good knowledge of astronomy or physics or someone with high-level government clearance. Time after time, their 'victims' turn out to be homemakers, agricultural workers, or others whose relevant knowledge base seems to be limited to reading UFO enthusiast literature. Even UFO sightings turn out to be reserved (for the most part) for those who have not studied the sky in any serious way. Although the world's supply of professional astronomers is not much larger than the population of Wasilla, Alaska, the world has many tens of thousands of active amateur astronomers who spend a great deal of time observing the sky. You would think that if UFOs really are alien spacecraft, a large majority of reported sightings would come from this group. Yet, unsurprising to astronomers, you almost never get UFO reports from experienced amateurs whose understanding of what they see in the sky is much more sophisticated than that of the average person.

All of which does not mean that astronomers in general are pessimistic about the presence of intelligent life on planets around other stars. Indeed, many observations over the last few decades have increased the level of optimism in the astronomical community about the potential for life to exist out there. Primary among these is the discovery of more than 300 planets around relatively nearby stars, which certainly shows that planetary systems like our own may be far more common than we dared to hope. We just don't think that intelligent aliens are necessarily visiting Earth. The problem is that the stars are fantastically far away. If our Sun was the size of a basketball (instead of 864,000 miles across), Earth would be a small apple seed about thirty yards away from the ball. On that scale, the nearest star would be some 4,200 miles (7,000 km) away, and all the other stars would be even farther! This is why astronomers are sceptical that aliens are coming here, briefly picking up a random individual or two, and then going back home. It seems like an awfully small reward for such an enormous travel investment.



1) The primary purpose of the author in the passage is to:

a. make distinctions between those who are mere lay people interested in the extraterrestrial and qualified scientists and astronomers.
b. present us with a wealth of information to enable us to make our own judgements regarding UFOs.
c. justify the presence of UFOs through examples of sightings and people's accounts.
d. debunk claims about UFO sightings by lay people, using reasoning and analysis to back his assertion.
e. state that though he does not believe in the stories of UFO sightings, he believes in the existence of aliens.


2) The author's statement in the first paragraph that he 'absolutely believes' in UFOs is:
a. purely sarcastic.
b. intended to ridicule those who believe in UFO sightings.
c. sarcastic, but also with a different meaning to it.
d. an honest and genuine assertion.
e. none of these.


3) Which of these is a main argument of the author against the reported sightings of UFOs?

a. UFO sightings are uncommon and seem to be experienced only by lay people, and not by astronomers; hence they are unrealistic.
b. UFO sightings seem to happen only to amateurs with basic scientific knowledge.
c. UFO sightings are common only in certain areas and therefore cannot be described as a widespread or universal phenomenon.
d. UFO sightings are little more than fantasy since there is little chance of intelligent beings existing on any planet apart from Earth.
e. UFO sightings can be verified and legitimized only by scientists and astronomers, and no such 'sightings' till date have been thus verified or legitimized.


4) Which of these is the author's precise outlook on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial life?

a. He believes that the presence of intelligent life apart from human beings is possible, but that aliens are visiting us in UFOs is merely an illusion.
b. He believes that extraterrestrial life exists, but it is not advanced enough to send 'UFO's' into space.
c. He believes that extraterrestrial life exists, but UFOs are mere fantasy.
d. He advances the idea of extraterrestrial life while being non-committal as regards the existence of UFOs.
e. He merely states that astronomers believe that extraterrestrial life can exist, without revealing his own opinion, but debunks UFO theories.


_________________
If this post helped you learn something pls give kudos

Originally posted by doomedcat on 05 Nov 2018, 10:11.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 06 May 2019, 00:55, edited 1 time in total.
Updated.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 39
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2018, 00:29
Can someone discuss question 2? Why is option D incorrect and what exactly does option C mean?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 May 2017
Posts: 11
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2018, 13:11
2
bhavik1995 wrote:
Can someone discuss question 2? Why is option D incorrect and what exactly does option C mean?


Because the author believes in extra terrestrial life, not really UFO. You can tell through the author's rhetoric. There are several examples in the first paragraph that shows he's not very serious about the term "UFO."

For instance:
Indeed, upon more careful investigation, many so-called UFOs turn out to be perfectly natural objects or processes in the Earth's atmosphere or beyond.

"So called' can be interpreted as "...many unsupported UFO [sightings]..."
Senior RC Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: ----__----___-----____-----
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 3071
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2019, 00:56
+1 Kudos to posts containing answer explanation of all questions
_________________
New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Final days of the GMAT Exam? => All GMAT Flashcards.
This Post Helps = Press +1 Kudos
Best of Luck on the GMAT!!
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Jul 2018
Posts: 63
Location: India
Schools: IMD
GPA: 4
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2019, 09:04
doomedcat wrote:
New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Passage # 178, Date : 30-APR-2019
This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019. Click here for Details


When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always tell my students that I absolutely believe in UFOs. After a brief pause for incredulous stares, I ask them to think about what the term UFO actually means. I explain that I fully believe there are objects in the sky that the average person may not be able to identify. This does not mean, however, that no one can identify these objects. It only means that they could appear 'unidentified' to someone who is not familiar with the sky or with the full range of sky phenomena that can surprise a novice. Indeed, upon more careful investigation, many so-called UFOs turn out to be perfectly natural objects or processes in the Earth's atmosphere or beyond. As the late Carl Sagan emphasized, 'Extraordinary hypotheses require extraordinary proof.' Surely, the notion that some mysterious phenomenon you briefly observed in the sky must be an interstellar spacecraft (and not a human craft, meteor, or a bright planet) qualifies as such an 'extra-ordinary' hypothesis! Yet, amazingly, given the number of UFO incidents believers report, not one UFO has left behind any proof - a piece of spacecraft material or machinery (or even a sandwich wrapper) that laboratory analysis has shown to be of clearly extraterrestrial origin. It's also remarkable how unlucky the UFO occupants are in their choice of people to kidnap. Never do 'aliens' seem to snatch a person with a good knowledge of astronomy or physics or someone with high-level government clearance. Time after time, their 'victims' turn out to be homemakers, agricultural workers, or others whose relevant knowledge base seems to be limited to reading UFO enthusiast literature. Even UFO sightings turn out to be reserved (for the most part) for those who have not studied the sky in any serious way. Although the world's supply of professional astronomers is not much larger than the population of Wasilla, Alaska, the world has many tens of thousands of active amateur astronomers who spend a great deal of time observing the sky. You would think that if UFOs really are alien spacecraft, a large majority of reported sightings would come from this group. Yet, unsurprising to astronomers, you almost never get UFO reports from experienced amateurs whose understanding of what they see in the sky is much more sophisticated than that of the average person.

All of which does not mean that astronomers in general are pessimistic about the presence of intelligent life on planets around other stars. Indeed, many observations over the last few decades have increased the level of optimism in the astronomical community about the potential for life to exist out there. Primary among these is the discovery of more than 300 planets around relatively nearby stars, which certainly shows that planetary systems like our own may be far more common than we dared to hope. We just don't think that intelligent aliens are necessarily visiting Earth. The problem is that the stars are fantastically far away. If our Sun was the size of a basketball (instead of 864,000 miles across), Earth would be a small apple seed about thirty yards away from the ball. On that scale, the nearest star would be some 4,200 miles (7,000 km) away, and all the other stars would be even farther! This is why astronomers are sceptical that aliens are coming here, briefly picking up a random individual or two, and then going back home. It seems like an awfully small reward for such an enormous travel investment.


1) The primary purpose of the author in the passage is to:

a. make distinctions between those who are mere lay people interested in the extraterrestrial and qualified scientists and astronomers.
b. present us with a wealth of information to enable us to make our own judgements regarding UFOs.
c. justify the presence of UFOs through examples of sightings and people's accounts.
d. debunk claims about UFO sightings by lay people, using reasoning and analysis to back his assertion.
e. state that though he does not believe in the stories of UFO sightings, he believes in the existence of aliens.


2) The author's statement in the first paragraph that he 'absolutely believes' in UFOs is:
a. purely sarcastic.
b. intended to ridicule those who believe in UFO sightings.
c. sarcastic, but also with a different meaning to it.
d. an honest and genuine assertion.
e. none of these.


3) Which of these is a main argument of the author against the reported sightings of UFOs?

a. UFO sightings are uncommon and seem to be experienced only by lay people, and not by astronomers; hence they are unrealistic.
b. UFO sightings seem to happen only to amateurs with basic scientific knowledge.
c. UFO sightings are common only in certain areas and therefore cannot be described as a widespread or universal phenomenon.
d. UFO sightings are little more than fantasy since there is little chance of intelligent beings existing on any planet apart from Earth.
e. UFO sightings can be verified and legitimized only by scientists and astronomers, and no such 'sightings' till date have been thus verified or legitimized.


4) Which of these is the author's precise outlook on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial life?

a. He believes that the presence of intelligent life apart from human beings is possible, but that aliens are visiting us in UFOs is merely an illusion.
b. He believes that extraterrestrial life exists, but it is not advanced enough to send 'UFO's' into space.
c. He believes that extraterrestrial life exists, but UFOs are mere fantasy.
d. He advances the idea of extraterrestrial life while being non-committal as regards the existence of UFOs.
e. He merely states that astronomers believe that extraterrestrial life can exist, without revealing his own opinion, but debunks UFO theories.




Need help to understand Q-1. I selected option A; please help to explain the reasoning/analysis used to select option D.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Oct 2017
Posts: 8
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2019, 09:32
2
Is this really at 700 level? IT was too straight forward and the questions were simple. These kind of passages give us a very wrong judgement of the actual GMAT. We think we would be able to solve tough ones, but the actual exam passages are waaaayyy harder!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Jun 2018
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 620 Q40 V35
GMAT 3: 660 Q41 V40
GPA: 3.32
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2019, 10:19
3
Ritwick91 wrote:
doomedcat wrote:
New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Passage # 178, Date : 30-APR-2019
This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019. Click here for Details


When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always tell my students that I absolutely believe in UFOs. After a brief pause for incredulous stares, I ask them to think about what the term UFO actually means. I explain that I fully believe there are objects in the sky that the average person may not be able to identify. This does not mean, however, that no one can identify these objects. It only means that they could appear 'unidentified' to someone who is not familiar with the sky or with the full range of sky phenomena that can surprise a novice. Indeed, upon more careful investigation, many so-called UFOs turn out to be perfectly natural objects or processes in the Earth's atmosphere or beyond. As the late Carl Sagan emphasized, 'Extraordinary hypotheses require extraordinary proof.' Surely, the notion that some mysterious phenomenon you briefly observed in the sky must be an interstellar spacecraft (and not a human craft, meteor, or a bright planet) qualifies as such an 'extra-ordinary' hypothesis! Yet, amazingly, given the number of UFO incidents believers report, not one UFO has left behind any proof - a piece of spacecraft material or machinery (or even a sandwich wrapper) that laboratory analysis has shown to be of clearly extraterrestrial origin. It's also remarkable how unlucky the UFO occupants are in their choice of people to kidnap. Never do 'aliens' seem to snatch a person with a good knowledge of astronomy or physics or someone with high-level government clearance. Time after time, their 'victims' turn out to be homemakers, agricultural workers, or others whose relevant knowledge base seems to be limited to reading UFO enthusiast literature. Even UFO sightings turn out to be reserved (for the most part) for those who have not studied the sky in any serious way. Although the world's supply of professional astronomers is not much larger than the population of Wasilla, Alaska, the world has many tens of thousands of active amateur astronomers who spend a great deal of time observing the sky. You would think that if UFOs really are alien spacecraft, a large majority of reported sightings would come from this group. Yet, unsurprising to astronomers, you almost never get UFO reports from experienced amateurs whose understanding of what they see in the sky is much more sophisticated than that of the average person.

All of which does not mean that astronomers in general are pessimistic about the presence of intelligent life on planets around other stars. Indeed, many observations over the last few decades have increased the level of optimism in the astronomical community about the potential for life to exist out there. Primary among these is the discovery of more than 300 planets around relatively nearby stars, which certainly shows that planetary systems like our own may be far more common than we dared to hope. We just don't think that intelligent aliens are necessarily visiting Earth. The problem is that the stars are fantastically far away. If our Sun was the size of a basketball (instead of 864,000 miles across), Earth would be a small apple seed about thirty yards away from the ball. On that scale, the nearest star would be some 4,200 miles (7,000 km) away, and all the other stars would be even farther! This is why astronomers are sceptical that aliens are coming here, briefly picking up a random individual or two, and then going back home. It seems like an awfully small reward for such an enormous travel investment.


1) The primary purpose of the author in the passage is to:

a. make distinctions between those who are mere lay people interested in the extraterrestrial and qualified scientists and astronomers.
b. present us with a wealth of information to enable us to make our own judgements regarding UFOs.
c. justify the presence of UFOs through examples of sightings and people's accounts.
d. debunk claims about UFO sightings by lay people, using reasoning and analysis to back his assertion.
e. state that though he does not believe in the stories of UFO sightings, he believes in the existence of aliens.


2) The author's statement in the first paragraph that he 'absolutely believes' in UFOs is:
a. purely sarcastic.
b. intended to ridicule those who believe in UFO sightings.
c. sarcastic, but also with a different meaning to it.
d. an honest and genuine assertion.
e. none of these.


3) Which of these is a main argument of the author against the reported sightings of UFOs?

a. UFO sightings are uncommon and seem to be experienced only by lay people, and not by astronomers; hence they are unrealistic.
b. UFO sightings seem to happen only to amateurs with basic scientific knowledge.
c. UFO sightings are common only in certain areas and therefore cannot be described as a widespread or universal phenomenon.
d. UFO sightings are little more than fantasy since there is little chance of intelligent beings existing on any planet apart from Earth.
e. UFO sightings can be verified and legitimized only by scientists and astronomers, and no such 'sightings' till date have been thus verified or legitimized.


4) Which of these is the author's precise outlook on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial life?

a. He believes that the presence of intelligent life apart from human beings is possible, but that aliens are visiting us in UFOs is merely an illusion.
b. He believes that extraterrestrial life exists, but it is not advanced enough to send 'UFO's' into space.
c. He believes that extraterrestrial life exists, but UFOs are mere fantasy.
d. He advances the idea of extraterrestrial life while being non-committal as regards the existence of UFOs.
e. He merely states that astronomers believe that extraterrestrial life can exist, without revealing his own opinion, but debunks UFO theories.




Need help to understand Q-1. I selected option A; please help to explain the reasoning/analysis used to select option D.


The author discusses UFO sightings in such a way that they discredit anyone who claims they have seen a UFO by stating that astronomers, who are the professionals in this case, have not observed anything close to being a UFO. The author furthers their point by stating that UFO sightings and encounters are generally experienced by lay people, meaning they are not trained in astronomy.

Answer Choice A: The author doesn't make distinctions between lay people interested in the extraterrestrial and qualified scientists and astronomers, the author discredits lay people that are interested in the extraterrestrial.

Choice A is out.

Answer Choice B: The author does present information, but clearly takes one side of the argument.

Choice B is out.

Answer Choice C: The author doesn't justify the presence of UFO's, they in fact do the opposite.

Choice C is out.

Answer Choice D: "Debunk claims...analysis to back his assertion." debunk=discredit.

This is the correct answer choice.

Answer Choice E: This one is tempting. The author does site the increased level of optimism in the astronomical community about the potential for life to exist out there, but it is not the main argument of the passage.

Choice E is out.



Please send some kudos if this was helpful!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Jun 2018
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 620 Q40 V35
GMAT 3: 660 Q41 V40
GPA: 3.32
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2019, 10:20
1
Poojithaog wrote:
Is this really at 700 level? IT was too straight forward and the questions were simple. These kind of passages give us a very wrong judgement of the actual GMAT. We think we would be able to solve tough ones, but the actual exam passages are waaaayyy harder!



Agreed, this passage is too straight forward to be a 700 level one.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 10
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2019, 17:56
Hiee ,

For ques no 3 , what is wrong with choice A?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Status: Godspeed
Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Posts: 3
Location: Bahrain
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2019, 09:59
SajjadAhmad wrote:
+1 Kudos to posts containing answer explanation of all questions


How do I find answers to the rest of New Project RC Butler 2019 RCs. Appreciate your help so far!!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Jun 2018
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 620 Q40 V35
GMAT 3: 660 Q41 V40
GPA: 3.32
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2019, 13:34
2
Akshi123 wrote:
Hiee ,

For ques no 3 , what is wrong with choice A?


Great question!
Because this has to do with the main argument of the author, we have to consider the passage as a whole.

I narrowed it down to answer choices A and E.

Answer Choice A:
"UFO sightings are uncommon and seem to be experienced only by lay people, and not by astronomers; hence they are unrealistic."

My main issue with this choice is that the author doesn't explicitly state that UFO sightings are unrealistic because they are only experienced by lay people. The author instead says they are unrealistic because no astronomer has experienced a UFO sighting and therefore cannot verify them.

Answer Choice E is a better choice for this reason.

Please send some kudos if this was helpful!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Posts: 4
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2019, 22:21
Can anyone explain why not 4(E) and 2(D) ?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Jun 2017
Posts: 3
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2019, 18:45
1
PALLAVI2018mba wrote:
Can anyone explain why not 4(E) and 2(D) ?



Hi! I also chose E... after examining the answers choices here is what I think:

e. He merely states that astronomers believe that extraterrestrial life can exist, without revealing his own opinion, but debunks UFO theories. This answer says that he did not revealed his opinion on the matter but in the passage it says " WE just don't think that int. aliens are visiting Earth". Basically saying that he's opinion is the same as the scientists' opinion.

a. He believes that the presence of intelligent life apart from human beings is possible, but that aliens are visiting us in UFOs is merely an illusion. Does says its opinion. What made me not chose this answer was the word ILLUSION, thought it was extreme.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always   [#permalink] 12 May 2019, 18:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When I talk about UFOs in my introductory astronomy classes, I always

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne