Sneha2021
GMATNinja KarishmaBWhy A can't be equally important as B?
Please explain why meaning-wise it's wrong.
I believe that meaning of "equally important as" is both A & B have same importance. Then why this usage is incorrect?
-
-
The problem with (E) is the use of "equally important as".
The easiest way to eliminate E is to recognize the redundancy in "equally important as." X can be
as important as Y. X and Y can be
equally important. But X cannot be
equally important as Y.
(E) Global managers working with overseas clients find an understanding of cultural norms to be equally important as grasping the pivotal business issues.
The problem with (E) is the use of "equally important as".
A is equally important as B - Incorrect
A is as important as B - Correct
A and B are equally important - Correct
First, some good news. There was a typo in choice (E), and it should actually be:
(E) Global managers working with overseas clients find an understanding of cultural norms to be equally important to grasping the pivotal business issues.
(I thought we fixed that earlier, but I guess not. Sorry, everybody! Check out
this post for more on that.)
That said, "equally important as" does have a subtle problem. When we say, "A and B are equally important," we have a plural subject -- there are TWO things, and those two things ARE equally important.
However, one single thing, on its own, can't be "equally important," so it makes less sense to use one single thing as the subject when using "equally" (e.g., "A is equally as important as B.").
Would that be enough to eliminate (the unfixed version of) choice (E)? Maybe not -- you can certainly figure out the intended meaning. But "A and B are equally important" or "A is as important as B" are better, clearer ways of expressing the relationship.
I hope that helps!