sudhirgupta93
Isn't the use of not and unlike together weird?
Also we're comparing Martha's ability to remain calm during chaos and confusion with ability of Wilma, who (also) calmly attended to soldiers in bloodiest battles.
I think C does the job.
"Not unlike" should be fine, it's a standard construct to emphasize the nature of something being "not different" from that of something else.
I dug out another strikingly similar question for comparison purposes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While Jackie Robinson was a Brooklyn Dodger, his courage in the face of physical threats and verbal attacks was not unlike that of Rosa Parks, who refused to move to the back of a bus in Montgomery,Alabama
(A)
not unlike that of Rosa Parks, who refused (B) not unlike Rosa Parks, who refused
(C) like Rosa Parks and her refusal
(D) like that of Rosa Parks for refusing
(E)
as that of Rosa Parks, who refused In this case the OA is, again, A.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For C "the ability was
as that of someone else" should be unidiomatic here; "like" - or, well, "not unlike" - would be appropriate. In comparisons between "things" you have to use "like", "as" is used for behavior or characteristics pertaining to one in particular. Furthermore, this tends to avoid confusion in sentences like these:
* As your father, I wish you well. -> I am your father, and I wish you well.
* Like your father, I wish you well. -> I am [your uncle/teacher/friend/etc.], and I wish you well.
Unfortunately I can't post links because of my low post count, but it's easy to check out on Google: just search "as or like" or something like that.