Jerz wrote:
Toubab wrote:
Interesting that three American arms manufacturers made the top of the list. Hm.
Is there something inherently unethical about being in the aerospace and defense industry?
I think Toubab is emphasizing the *ARMS* manufacturing division.
There is an ethical concern for the aerospace and defense industry. One of the companies in that list, The Aerospace Corporation, is essentially an ethics "cop" for the Department of Defense (DoD.) Mammoth DoD contracts can really be given out to a handful of companies for various reasons (some due to the technical complexity, others are security related,) so there really isn't as much open competition. Hence, this niche (but huge in terms of dollars) market has a lot of quirks.
One of them is how contracts work in the industry. For example, imagine Honeywell gets a contract to build a system that does 10 specific functions, but fails to deliver on three of those functions. DoD is not going to say "That's it! We're not going to work with Honeywell again. We're going to exclusively use Lockheed for these types of jobs in the future." Instead, they'll frown at Honeywell, but then renegotiate and ask how much more they have to give Honeywell so that the missing three functions can be added to the system. It's a really messed up market, but that's the reality.
Because of the exclusive, sensitive, and extremely technical nature of the aerospace and defense industry, there aren't that many major players, so a handful of people have a lot of say in this area. Considering the size of defense contracts, there is a huge temptation to influence key personnel when it comes to winning bids. You can google for Boeing's Pentagon procurement scandal, and subsequently their unexpected loss of the mid-flight refueling tanker contract (which itself became another scandal because apparently Northrop/Airbus has to give Boeing a share of that contract through subcontracts now.)
So while Toubab might have been implying that manufacturing arms and ethics don't quite go hand in hand, I'm saying that this exclusive, sensitive and small (in size) industry is essentially an ethical minefield that one has to navigate carefully as well.