|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
27 Apr 2025, 18:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Weakens Second Sentence: Two of the nose-tailed mongooses living in the Brooklyn Zoo are solid grey in color.
Must Be Assumed: There is no mongoose living in the New Delhi Zoo that is not nose-tailed.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
43% (02:51) correct
57%
(02:59)
wrong
based on 207
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Zookeeper: In the historical record, there are both examples of striped nose – tailed mongooses and examples of nose – tailed mongooses that are of a single solid color. However, to my knowledge every living nose – tailed mongoose is striped. Therefore, the mongooses living in the New Delhi Zoo are striped.
In the first column below, select that statement that weakens the second sentence in the argument above. In the second column below, select an assumption that must be made to draw the conclusion in the argument above. Make only two selections, one in each column.
In the first column below, select that statement that weakens the second sentence in the argument above. In the second column below, select an assumption that must be made to draw the conclusion in the argument above. Make only two selections, one in each column.
| Weakens Second Sentence | Must Be Assumed | |
| More than one living mongoose is nose-tailed. | ||
| Not all striped living mongooses are nose-tailed. | ||
| Two of the nose-tailed mongooses living in the Brooklyn Zoo are solid grey in color. | ||
| There is no mongoose living in the New Delhi Zoo that is not nose-tailed. | ||
| Not every striped mongoose living in the New Delhi Zoo is nose-tailed. | ||
| Some mongooses living in the New Delhi Zoo are neither striped nor nose-tailed. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Weakens Second Sentence: Two of the nose-tailed mongooses living in the Brooklyn Zoo are solid grey in color.
Must Be Assumed: There is no mongoose living in the New Delhi Zoo that is not nose-tailed.
27 Apr 2025, 18:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
MGMAT Official Solution:
This question draws on your Critical Reasoning skills—your ability to analyze an argument.
First, you are asked for a statement that would weaken the second sentence in the argument. The second sentence reads "However, to my knowledge every living nose-tailed mongoose is striped." What would weaken this claim?: Evidence that there are (or may be) some living nose-tailed mongoose who are not striped.
The only answer choice that fits this model is the third one: "Two of the nose-tailed mongooses living in the Brooklyn Zoo are solid grey in color."
As for the second column, you're looking for a necessary assumption for the argument—that is, an assumption that you must make in order to draw a valid conclusion. The conclusion of the argument is the final sentence: "Therefore, the mongooses living in the New Delhi Zoo are striped." There is a gap in this argument between "nose-tailed mongooses" in the second sentence and "mongooses" in the conclusion (it's possible that the mongooses in New Delhi aren't nose-tailed). A correct answer will close that gap, stating that all the mongooses in the New Delhi zoo are nose-tailed. The fourth choice does just that: "there is no mongoose living in the New Delhi Zoo that is not nose-tailed" (i.e., they are all nose-tailed). Framing the assumption in the negative is a common feature of correct answers for assumption questions.
First column: The correct answer is (C).
Second column: The correct answer is (D).
This question draws on your Critical Reasoning skills—your ability to analyze an argument.
First, you are asked for a statement that would weaken the second sentence in the argument. The second sentence reads "However, to my knowledge every living nose-tailed mongoose is striped." What would weaken this claim?: Evidence that there are (or may be) some living nose-tailed mongoose who are not striped.
The only answer choice that fits this model is the third one: "Two of the nose-tailed mongooses living in the Brooklyn Zoo are solid grey in color."
As for the second column, you're looking for a necessary assumption for the argument—that is, an assumption that you must make in order to draw a valid conclusion. The conclusion of the argument is the final sentence: "Therefore, the mongooses living in the New Delhi Zoo are striped." There is a gap in this argument between "nose-tailed mongooses" in the second sentence and "mongooses" in the conclusion (it's possible that the mongooses in New Delhi aren't nose-tailed). A correct answer will close that gap, stating that all the mongooses in the New Delhi zoo are nose-tailed. The fourth choice does just that: "there is no mongoose living in the New Delhi Zoo that is not nose-tailed" (i.e., they are all nose-tailed). Framing the assumption in the negative is a common feature of correct answers for assumption questions.
First column: The correct answer is (C).
Second column: The correct answer is (D).
29 Apr 2025, 03:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
(1st) Striped NT vs Solid NT
(2nd) Liv. NT -> Striped
(3rd) Liv. Delhi -> Striped [Conclusion]
To Weaken 2nd: To weaken A->B, by A-/>B or the Mere Coincidence trick
Liv. NT -> Solid
"Two of the nose-tailed mongooses living in the Brooklyn Zoo are solid grey in color." => [C]
Assumption for 3rd: NT is missing as a conditioning/assumption in 3rd.
We have to assume that all mongoose living in the Delhi zoo are NT => [D]
(2nd) Liv. NT -> Striped
(3rd) Liv. Delhi -> Striped [Conclusion]
To Weaken 2nd: To weaken A->B, by A-/>B or the Mere Coincidence trick
Liv. NT -> Solid
"Two of the nose-tailed mongooses living in the Brooklyn Zoo are solid grey in color." => [C]
Assumption for 3rd: NT is missing as a conditioning/assumption in 3rd.
We have to assume that all mongoose living in the Delhi zoo are NT => [D]
