Quote:
Zoologists seeking evidence that the Gigantopithicus (giant ape) once inhabited a certain region are digging into the middle and lower layers of a mound of earth. Gigantopithicus is known to have gone extinct before Neanderthal man came into existence. The bottom of the middle layer contains some Neanderthal bones, but the lower layer does not.
Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The Neanderthals represented by the fossilized bones were not native to this region but wandered to it from another, distant region.
(B) The Gigantopithicus species lived for a long time before it become extinct.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period in which Gigantopithicus lived.
(D) Zoologists will not find any evidence of Gigantopithicus in this region.
(E) The lower layer represents the period during which Neanderthal man lived.
This question looks great until you see it for what it is, namely
an old official question that has been given a makeover. Compare the highlighted potions below to the passage above:
Quote:
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.
Sure, answer choice (A) in the original question became (E) in the copycat question, (D) became (B), and
imported in (E) was cleverly disguised as
not native to in (A), but (C) is virtually identical. It is a shame that a company as reputable as Veritas Prep would produce a plagiarized question such as this, and it is not the first time I have pointed out this exact issue from the same company. I have confidence that the tutoring/teaching staff is knowledgeable about the GMAT™, so why not put these minds to use crafting
original questions, those that will not hinder someone who may study this sort of question, come across the official version down the line and get it right immediately, and perhaps develop a false sense of security in their test-readiness in the process?
I know it is challenging to produce questions from scratch. But I think it is more useful for the community to see original questions, even those that may not be as streamlined or as logically tight as official questions, to say nothing of ethical concerns.
AnthonyRitzHaileyCusimanoKarishmaB (I know, no longer of Veritas)
VeritasPrepBrianDo you have any comments on the matter? Who writes this tripe, and why is it condoned at Veritas Prep? Finally, is there anyone you can talk to internally (Karishma excepted) to stop this practice?
- Andrew