GMAT Club
November 11, 2025
aliquamdolorem

Joined: Oct 05, 2025

Posts: 1

Kudos: 0

Verified GMAT Focus score:
715 Q88 V85 DI84

From 625 to 715: How e-GMAT Targeted Approach Delivered Results

REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by score report [?]

Improvement 90 Points

Course e-GMAT Online 360

Location Online

Strengths:

Coming from an engineering background, I scored 625 (Q82, V81, DI80) on my
diagnostic—decent, but not enough for my target schools. After researching multiple
platforms, I chose e-GMAT for one critical reason: its ability to identify and fix specific
weaknesses, not just teach concepts. My biggest challenge wasnt learning new
material—it was execution. I had a 60% hard accuracy in Critical Reasoning, careless errors
plaguing my Quant, and no clear path to improvement. I needed a platform that could
diagnose exactly where I was failing and provide surgical solutions.

Would make the product better:

The Quant section was unnecessarily difficult I think. The difficulty level of questions were way too much sometimes. The game-changers: e-GMAT custom quiz feature on Scholaranium and NEURON
question-type filtering transformed my preparation. Instead of grinding through hundreds of
random questions, I practiced with laser focus. Struggling with bold face CR questions? I
create a custom quiz with 10 hard bold face questions only, solve them, immediately review
solutions, and repeat. This targeted approach drove my CR hard accuracy from 60% to 82%.
The error log showed me patterns I couldnt see myself—specific question types where I
consistently failed. Scholaranium filtering let me isolate these exact weaknesses by topic
and difficulty. For Data Insights, where quality resources are scarce, e-GMAT
comprehensive material was sufficient on its own. The data sufficiency questions specifically
forced me to think about edge cases, not just solve mechanically.

The results speak clearly: 715 (Q88, V85, DI84—97th percentile). That's Q82→Q88,
V81→V85, DI80→DI84—a 90-point improvement. But here what sealed my confidence:
Sigma-X mock accuracy. My last two mock scores were 695 and 705. My official score? 715.
That predictive accuracy meant the strategies I developed in practice actually worked on test
day. The solution quality—99.9% of explanations were clear without needing external
help—taught me efficient methods I never considered. The forum feature meant my
questions were already answered. Sectional mocks built stamina without full 2.5-hour
commitments. Last Mile Push mentorship identified strategic gaps I missed. Bottom line: If
youre scoring 600+ and need to reach 700+, e-GMAT provides the diagnostic precision and
targeted practice to eliminate execution errors systematically. Not just content—a complete
improvement system. Highly recommended for anyone willing to practice smart, not just
hard.

Login to create/modify/remove your own comments