ABSOLUTE GAME CHANGERS FOR TOP UNIVERSITIES

REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by waiver or admit report [?]

Product UniAdvise Admissions Consulting

Consultant Vani Duggal

Strengths:

I worked with UniAdvise for my MiM applications and ended up getting admits from LBS, HEC Paris, and ESSEC.

What really stood out to me was how structured and personalised their approach was. Before even starting essays, they spent a lot of time understanding my profile and then mapped it against what each school actually looks for.

The essay process was intense but very different from what I expected. Instead of giving generic edits, they broke down what each question is actually testing and helped me build a storyline that felt authentic but also aligned with the school’s evaluation criteria.

I had spoken to a couple of other consultants before this, but most of them felt templatised. With UniAdvise, it genuinely felt like they knew the scoring frameworks of these schools and were reverse-engineering my application to fit that.

Overall, if you’re applying to top MiM programs and want clarity + honest feedback (not sugarcoating), I’d strongly recommend working with them.

Would make the product better:

Absolutely nothing! Probably just market yourself more as you guys are doing a great job but are pretty lowkey in terms of marketing

I worked with UniAdvise for my MiM applications and ended up getting admits from LBS, HEC Paris, and ESSEC.

What really stood out to me was how structured and personalised their approach was. Before even starting essays, they spent a lot of time understanding my profile and then mapped it against what each school actually looks for.

The essay process was intense but very different from what I expected. Instead of giving generic edits, they broke down what each question is actually testing and helped me build a storyline that felt authentic but also aligned with the school’s evaluation criteria.

I had spoken to a couple of other consultants before this, but most of them felt templatised. With UniAdvise, it genuinely felt like they knew the scoring frameworks of these schools and were reverse-engineering my application to fit that.

Overall, if you’re applying to top MiM programs and want clarity + honest feedback (not sugarcoating), I’d strongly recommend working with them.

Login to create/modify/remove your own comments