Strengths:

An exhaustive Error Tracker.
Ample chapter-wise problems.
Problems always include links to relevant lessons and concepts, making learning and revision easier.
Well-researched, evidence-based advice on the best study, revision, and test day practices.
A robust prep roadmap focused on "doing things the right way. "
Sufficient revision and reinforcement tests at regular intervals within the roadmap ensure that one retains all that has been studied up to that point.

Would make the product better:

Nothing, they know what they are doing!

In January 2024, I walked out of my test centre with a knot in my stomach. My score was 640, a number that, while not disastrous, felt like a poor return on the months of preparation I had invested. I knew I had worked hard, yet I couldn’t see where it had all slipped away. More than disappointment, I felt lost, unsure of what exactly needed fixing.
The months that followed were frustrating. The GMAT format had just shifted from Classic to Focus, and the material I had once spent hours on was slipping from memory. I knew I had to start over, but I didn’t know how. I wanted to power through it just to move on, but not without doing it right this time. That’s when I stumbled onto TTP.
In May 2025, I signed up for their five-day free trial. On the very first day, I took a GMAT Official Practice Exam and scored a 575, which translates to a 610 on the Classic scale. That stung. But it gave me clarity. I didn’t just need to practice more, I needed a better system. I signed up for the monthly plan immediately.
TTP opened with a few pages on how to study well. It wasn’t flashy advice. It was practical and grounded: real progress takes time, shortcuts won’t cut it. Since my mock Quant score was decent, I was placed on the fast-track plan. That meant I could skip full lessons and dive straight into chapter-wise drills. The Easy and Medium questions went fine, but the Hard ones took more time than they should have. I logged every mistake using their Error Tracker and followed the lesson links to relearn the concepts. This helped me zoom in on what actually needed work.
By the end of Quant, I had recorded over 150 mistakes. Some were concept issues, others were careless slip-ups. Looking back at those logs showed me patterns I wouldn’t have caught otherwise, like how I consistently fumbled PEMDAS by ignoring the left-to-right rule. Grouping mistakes by type helped me spot those blind spots and change how I approached similar questions.
Honestly, the Error Tracker was a game-changer. It felt like using a second brain. I could tag mistakes however I wanted, and by the end, I had only a dozen recurring problem types I kept coming back to. TTP clearly built this feature with real student feedback in mind.
Verbal was a similar story. I had trouble with the tougher Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension questions. Often, I’d make panicked guesses when the timer ticked down. But using the same system of logging, reviewing, and fixing, I slowly got better. The structure helped, but the discipline it built mattered even more.
With time, I developed something I hadn’t had before: a feel for time. I could glance at a question and instinctively know how long it should take. That awareness hadn’t existed in my first attempt. Now, it was second nature.
When I got to the Data Insights section, I applied what I’d already learned. I approached it with more patience and better pacing. Slowly, I got better at spotting which questions to tackle and which to skip. That one change transformed how I handled the section.
DI used to be the section where I’d run out of time. Now, I was finishing with time to spare and reviewing flagged questions. That feeling of being in control was new to me, and it changed how I viewed the exam.
That said, DI remained my weakest link. I wish I had spent more time on it. My final score reflected that gap. I had drilled Quant and Verbal deeply, but DI didn’t get the same attention. The same refinement didn’t happen there.
Part of the issue was the question pool. At the time, DI was still new and evolving, and the GMAT Focus format was also fresh. TTP’s DI content hadn’t fully caught up. But I can’t blame them. Given how fast they improve things, I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s far better now.
After finishing the course, I turned to official mocks. TTP places a lot of importance on mocks and on pausing between them to analyse what went wrong. That loop of testing, pausing, and adjusting helped me understand not just the content but how I performed under pressure.
One big thing I figured out was section order. I used to think starting with Quant made sense. It felt logical, like easing into the test with the "easier" section. But every time I did that, I found myself mentally checked out by the time I reached Verbal and DI. I’d front-loaded my confidence and was left trying to drag myself through the rest.
Then I read something on TTP's exam tips section that some test-takers perform better when they save their strongest section for last. That clicked. I changed things up and started with Verbal instead.
My mock scores during that stretch were 655, 655, 645, 645, 625, and finally 685. Even as the scores dropped, I didn’t revert to my old order. I trusted the process. I trusted myself. I kept reviewing, kept adjusting.
That 625 told me everything. It wasn’t about knowledge; rather, it was about mindset. I was hesitating, unsure if the new strategy would work. Once I dropped the second-guessing, my silly mistakes stopped. That insight carried me into the final leg.
When I took my last mock, everything came together. I was calm. Focused. Balanced. The nerves were still there, but they had lost their grip on me. I had a rhythm. I knew when to fight for a question and when to move on. That final mock didn’t feel like a test, it felt like closure.
That 685 wasn’t just a number. It was proof that I had done the work. It gave me the confidence to book my official test.
This time, I chose the online version. I knew even small environmental details could mess with my performance. I didn’t want to go back to the same test centre where I’d first fallen apart. Home felt safer. I also reminded myself to keep the test in perspective, something I’d picked up from TTP.
Test day went better than I could have imagined. The tough questions didn’t shake me. I skipped what I needed to, guessed when it made sense, and marked questions with a steady hand. I wasn’t giving myself pep talks anymore. I was simply focused and executing without hesitation. I even finished early and had time to review everything I’d flagged. That hadn’t happened once during mocks.
And then the score came up. 695. That’s roughly equivalent to a 740 on the old GMAT Classic scale, meaning I saw a 100-point jump since my first attempt. I stared at the screen, stunned. I kept waiting for it to be wrong. But a few weeks later, the official score arrived, and it was real.
From walking out of a test centre in January 2024 feeling crushed, to leaning back in my chair at home on January 8, 2025, seeing the number I’d worked for, it’s hard to explain what that meant.
Even then, a part of me wondered if it had really happened, if maybe I had just been lucky that day. That doubt disappeared when I opened the score breakdown and saw it, a perfect 90 in Verbal. I had never achieved that before, not in mocks, not in drills. It was the GMAT itself telling me, in the clearest language it speaks, that the months of steady practice, the control over my nerves, and the rhythm I had worked so hard to build had all clicked at exactly the right moment.
All I’ll say is this: I wish I had found TTP earlier, before I gave my first attempt. It would’ve saved me time, energy, and a whole lot of frustration. Their system works if you let it. I’ve told every GMAT taker I know about them.
If you're still with me, I hope this gives you a clear picture of what this journey was like. I know this review is long. But anything shorter wouldn’t have captured how much this journey taught me, or how much credit TTP deserves. They earned my trust and helped me reach a score I once thought was out of reach. That 100-point improvement didn’t happen by chance. TTP may set the benchmark, but in my case, it was earned slowly through structure, consistency, and trust in the process.

Read More

Strengths:

Well-structured curriculum; bite-sized lessons; practice questions after each lesson

TTP has a well-structured and comprehensive curriculum that really helped me master the topics tested on the GMAT, especially in quant. What I appreciated most was that it didn’t just walk me through the concepts, but also shared practical tips on how to approach problems more efficiently under time pressure. The bite-sized lessons, followed by targeted practice questions and chapter tests, really helped reinforce what I had just learned. I found the platform super easy to follow, and the progression felt very logical. Honestly, I wish I had started studying with TTP earlier, it would’ve saved me a lot of time and frustration.

Read More

Strengths:

Target Test Prep has been fantastic for giving my GMAT prep structure and depth. After using Magoosh and running out of questions, I really appreciated how TTP’s modules are clearly organized and build up skills step by step. The variety and volume of practice problems kept me constantly challenged, and the live support from the TTP team has been outstanding.

Quant has been my biggest weakness so far, but Target Test Prep’s clear, step-by-step lessons give me confidence I’ll improve steadily. Their structured approach is exactly what I need to build strong Quant fundamentals and raise my score. There's focus on repetition till mastery has helped me to build confidence and knowledge in a way other platforms have not.

I recently scored a 655 on the GMAT Focus test and plan to retake it soon. With TTP, I feel equipped with the right tools and support to keep leveling up. I highly recommend Target Test Prep to anyone seeking a comprehensive, well-organized, and effective GMAT prep experience that really helps address weaknesses and build skills.

Read More

Strengths:

Target Test Prep (TTP) is an exceptional GMAT prep platform. Its structured, comprehensive curriculum breaks down complex topics into digestible lessons, reinforced by hundreds of practice questions and analytics that track performance. The interface is user-friendly, and the custom study plans are ideal for disciplined, goal-driven learners. TTP’s emphasis on mastering fundamentals before advancing ensures deep understanding and consistent score improvement.

Would make the product better:

A mobile app would be even easier to use on the go

Its the holy grail. Go for it. As simple as that. Its a bit on the expensive end but completely worth it. Stick to their study plan and follow it religiously. Do not cheat with the tests. Go through each one of them. Everyone speaks about Quant but Verbal is great too. Make it a point to pick up on the common themes they point out in Verbal. These themes will help you spot trends on questions and get to the final answer. I do not even need to talk about Quant. Its super comprehensive. Going through the quant section ensures you know all concepts required for the exam.

Read More

Strengths:

High-quality study material with effective guidance on test-taking strategy to gain a competitive edge

Would make the product better:

The prices might be high, especially for Indians; but I also understand that quality material cannot be offered at cheap prices.

Target Test Prep not only helps but drafts a complete study plan for you, effectively lining up tasks in the order in which it's best to do them. Reading the lessons particularly had a huge difference on my strategy, helping me to score a 705 with a Q90. The error log helps you identify patterns in which you are most prone to making mistakes, and since identifying the problem is a problem half solved, one approaches the certain type of questions more cautiously, preventing such errors in the future. The questions are pretty similar to the actual GMAT, so be assured that you won't be surprised during the actual exam. TTP helps you gain a competitive edge over other test-takers with the several tips and gimmicks given in the reading lessons.

Read More

Strengths:

Very comprehensive curriculum, particularly on the math section, where I was by far the weakest and needed the most focus

Would make the product better:

Nothing. While studying for the GMAT is hard and a long process, following the curriculum got me there in an effective way.

I found Target Test Prep to be extremely effective. While studying for the GMAT is a long process requiring extreme patience and endurance, I followed the process and earned a score far above what I thought I ever could.

I particularly valued how thorough the quantitative section was, which I was extremely rusty on. After getting ~50th percentile in quant on my first diagnostic exam, I considered jut giving up, and I'm glad I stuck with it and used TTP to get where I needed. It felt slow at first because after every new chapter the curriculum includes significant review of the chapter you just completed and the entire coursework you've studied so far, but over time I realized how imperative it was to stay fresh on subjects I studied early on, since the studying process takes several months. With hindsight, I think the balance and pacing of new material and review was perfect for moving forward effectively, and I was able to complete my studying in about 3 months while also working over 40 hours per week full-time.

Read More

Strengths:

Target Test Prep played a pivotal role in helping me reach my GMAT goals. The platform’s structured, modular approach made complex topics feel digestible and approachable. I especially appreciated the in-depth focus on quant, where the detailed lessons, high-quality practice questions, and error trackers allowed me to strengthen my fundamentals and improve consistently. The analytics dashboard was extremely helpful in tracking my progress and identifying weak areas. TTP doesn’t just teach content—it teaches strategy and discipline. I’d confidently recommend it to anyone looking for a serious, effective, and result-driven GMAT prep experience.

Would make the product better:

While I genuinely found the platform outstanding, if there’s one area I’d love to see expand, it would be the Verbal section. The current offerings are solid and follow the same structured and disciplined approach as Quant, but adding more practice questions and nuanced breakdowns for CR and RC would make the platform even more robust. That said, this is a small suggestion in the context of an otherwise exceptional product. The support, interface, and learning methodology already set a high bar. With a bit more verbal content, TTP would become the one-stop solution for all GMAT aspirants.

Target Test Prep was a cornerstone of my GMAT journey, and I can’t recommend it highly enough. The platform is thoughtfully designed, incredibly effective, and tailored for students who are serious about improving their scores—especially in Quant. Its step-by-step approach, insightful analytics, and high-yield practice questions kept me focused and accountable throughout my prep. Beyond just content, it instills the mindset and discipline needed to succeed on test day. I’m grateful for how much it helped me, and I’d gladly recommend TTP to anyone looking to boost their performance and confidence. It truly delivers on its promise.

Read More

Strengths:

Target Test Prep is an incredibly thorough and systematic GMAT prep platform, especially valuable for those struggling with the Quant section. The lessons break down each question type in a logical, digestible way, and the volume of high-quality practice problems ensures you are fully prepared for test day. Compared to other materials I tried, TTP stood out for how structured and in-depth it was—it truly helped me turn my weakest section into a strength and hit my target score range within a few weeks.

Target Test Prep was hands-down the most effective resource I used in preparing for the GMAT. As someone coming from a non-quant-heavy background, I needed a course that didn’t just give me practice problems, but actually taught me the underlying concepts—and TTP delivered exactly that. The platform is incredibly well-organized, with comprehensive lessons, smart pacing tools, and an endless bank of practice questions that closely mirror the exam. I saw my score jump from the mid-500s to the high-600s in just over two months, and it was largely thanks to how methodical and targeted TTP’s approach is. If you’re serious about improving your score—especially in Quant—this program is absolutely worth it!!

Read More

Strengths:

I loved the course structure as well as the chat bot AI support.

Would make the product better:

To include some gmat mock tests to give prior the official mocks would be a great add on.

The course is really comprehensive and covers all aspects of GMAT prep. I am really satisfied with the courseware. I really loved how there were multiple tests for each level of each and every lesson. The tests were very helpful as they not only did test my understanding of the concepts that were being taught but also taught some newer concepts. Additionally the tests helped me time myself and analyse what were my weak spots and what were the major topics that I should have another look at. Plus the video solutions that are provided can be very helpful as they are very easy to understand. On the whole it is a very good course to take.

Read More

Strengths:

Personalized study plan according to my availability
An error tracker with the option to create mock tests using only the questions I got wrong
Clear explanations that help you study at your own pace

Would make the product better:

Nothing

The TTP platform creates a study plan for you based on the amount of time you say you have available each day, and so you can focus on the most important things: studying and understanding every concept and topic you need to reach your target score.
At the end of my TTP plan, I focused all my efforts on Error Tracking and it helped me a lot to reinforce some concepts that I wasn’t confident about. The ability to create some mock tests using only the questions I got wrong was a very important tool in my journey. The tests at the end of each chapter helped me build my confidence daily and prepared me for managing the time I had for each question.

When I started the TTP course, I knew nothing about the GMAT. After six months of study, I scored 715 on my first attempt. TTP was absolutely essential to my success.

Read More