Strengths:

Experts Global GMAT mock tests are widely valued for their high-quality, exam-oriented practice and detailed analytics. One of their key strengths is the accuracy of their adaptive algorithm, which closely mimics the real GMAT experience, helping students build stamina and time management skills. The question quality is consistently strong, especially in Quant and Data Insights, with a good mix of medium to very hard questions that push conceptual clarity. Another major advantage is their in-depth performance reports, which break down accuracy, pacing, and topic-wise weaknesses, allowing targeted improvement. Additionally, their solutions are clear and structured, often offering multiple approaches to solve a problem. The tests are also known for being slightly tougher than the actual exam, which helps students feel more prepared and confident on test day. Overall, Experts Global mocks provide a realistic, challenging, and highly diagnostic practice environment for serious GMAT aspirants aiming for top scores.

Would make the product better:

While Experts Global GMAT mock tests are highly effective, a few improvements could make them even more impactful for aspirants. One key area is the Verbal section, where question quality—especially in Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension—can sometimes feel less aligned with the official GMAT style, making it slightly less predictive. Enhancing the natural flow and subtlety of answer choices would improve realism. Additionally, the user interface could be made more polished and closer to the official exam platform to better simulate test-day conditions. Some explanations, though clear, can be overly lengthy; incorporating more concise, exam-focused shortcuts would benefit time-pressed students. Another improvement could be the inclusion of more structured study plans or adaptive practice recommendations based on performance analytics. Finally, adding sectional difficulty benchmarking against official GMAT levels would help students better interpret their scores. These refinements would further strengthen the overall preparation experience.

Experts Global GMAT mock tests offer a solid and reliable preparation resource for serious aspirants aiming for high scores. The tests are well-structured and closely simulate the adaptive nature of the actual GMAT, helping students develop both accuracy and endurance. The Quant and Data Insights sections stand out for their challenging and concept-driven questions, which are slightly tougher than the real exam and thus build confidence. The detailed performance analytics are particularly useful, providing deep insights into strengths, weaknesses, and time management patterns. However, the Verbal section can occasionally feel less aligned with official GMAT nuances, especially in terms of answer choice phrasing. The interface, while functional, could be more polished to better replicate the real test environment. Overall, Experts Global mocks are an excellent tool for rigorous practice, especially for students who have already built a strong foundation and are looking to push their scores higher.

Read More

Strengths:

I took fourteen out of fifteen tests which i found quite useful in building my stamina & identifying the gaps to Improve.
The difficulty level of the questions was bit higher than the actual tests, one can expect 20-30 points higher in actual test than the average received in expert global mock tests.
The quant & DI part especially found tougher whereas verbal was similar to as in actual.
Helps in building stamina as well as finding lacuna.
Reduces exam time anxity by familarising with the interface & pattern.

Would make the product better:

Avoid question repetition from
GMAT Club.

I took fourteen out of fifteen tests which i found quite useful in building my stamina & identifying the gaps to Improve.
The difficulty level of the questions was bit higher than the actual tests, one can expect 20-30 points higher in actual test than the average received in expert global mock tests.
The quant & DI part especially found tougher whereas verbal was similar to as in actual.
It didn’t only boost my stamina it also helped in acclimatize with the actual exam environment providing similar interface to actual exam. Best value for money mocks in available all options recommended for mid to higher stage of preparation.

Read More

Strengths:

Experts Global mock tests are known for being close to the actual exam pattern, and this felt true while attempting them. The level of questions is generally moderate to slightly challenging, which helps in proper practice. The mocks are good for improving speed and accuracy, and the topic coverage is fairly comprehensive. The analysis after each test helps in understanding mistakes.

Would make the product better:

Some questions are not well explained which is why - you would turn to GMAT club to see why one was solved in such a way. The interface could also be improved to make it faster and more user-friendly. Occasionally, it was difficult logging in - and the mobile version is totally useless

Overall, Experts Global 15 mocks are a decent option for serious exam preparation. They give a realistic idea of exam pressure and help in identifying weak areas. While they are not perfect - I felt the DI questions were wrong - or it is just me and I am weak in MSR. But they serve their purpose well and are helpful if used consistently along with revision.

Strengths
Questions are close to the actual exam pattern
Moderate to tough difficulty, good for serious practice
Helps with time management and exam temperament
Covers most important topics from the syllabus
Good number of mocks for consistent practice

Weakness
Explanations are brief for some questions
Interface can feel slow or outdated
Not adaptive in nature - you can't experiment with few test taking strategies due to that
Analysis could be more detailed or visual

Read More

Strengths:

The platform is very similar to the actual exam. Questions are of high standard and ensures that a student gets to practise all types of difficulty.

Would make the product better:

The verbal section was relatively easy and the Quant was made highly difficult.

I found the overall level of tests to be reflective of my score in the exam. But not all tests are of the same level of difficulty. Quant was mostly comprised of very hard questions which sometimes makes it difficult to complete the test in the 45 min window. English was relatively the easiest of the 3 sections which is not the case at all in the real exam. The format of the exam however was a very good simulation of the real exam. Platform was quite smooth. The only issue with experts global is that they log you out very fast which is a hassle. Once your subscription expires you can't even look back at the questions which I find very wrong. Overall questions are great for practice and building stamina, but the platform needs to be more student friendly.

Read More

Strengths:

The strengths definitely are the very hard core Data insights that prepares you strongly, along with a very well crafted verbal.

Would make the product better:

The adaptiveness is missed, and adding more Verbal heavy quant questions.

My overall review is this: I used Experts Global to improve my exam readiness and lose any possible nerves that I had before giving the exam. All the questions are well set, and I would not take the score as an indication of where you stand, however it is important to realise that the number of questions is very representative of the actual GMAT exam. Do not be bogged down by the entire Data insights piece, rather aim to solve 12-14 questions and get them all correct. For Verbal, I believe the quality can be improved, and Quant can definitely be more tougher.

Read More

Strengths:

Strengths:
1. Quant is great to practice difficult questions
2. DI is also a good way to polish your time mgmt skills

Would make the product better:

Improvement areas:
1. Verbal section is not very similar to what we see on official exams in terms of structural thinking and reasoning which can be improved

Strengths:
1. Quant is great to practice difficult questions
2. DI is also a good way to polish your time mgmt skills
Improvement areas:
1. Verbal section is not very similar to what we see on official exams in terms of structural thinking and reasoning which can be improved
Overall a good practice to hone your time management skills and refine your quant and DI hard problem solving.
Expert Global Mocks can be used early in preparation, saving official MBA.com mocks for later as they are the closest to the actual GMAT and best for final benchmarking.
UI features such as quick navigation, review tools, and flexible test-taking options are appreciated, though test retake options and better tracking across devices will be a helpful addition.

Read More

Strengths:

Quant and DI

Would make the product better:

I think they should make them adaptive in order to get the accurate results

The quant & DI section is quite difficult and they have quality question. The only thing is their verbal section is not that difficult. It seems easier than the GMAT Club and OG mocks. But overall, for timed practice it is a good to go product.
I focused more on the quant section , and got an increment of 6 points in the official exam (from 76 to 82). The quant section feels easier in OG mocks.
If you compare the pricing, its economical than most of the Gmat mocks (TTP, E-GMAT, Manhattan). So , if you're in the beginning of your preparation, then you should start off with the Expert global and then you can switch to the official mocks and gmat club mocks

Read More

Strengths:

Quant questions covers almost all the topics which could be asked in actual GMAT exam.
Verbal questions also help strengthen concepts.

I found them to be extremely well-structured and closely aligned with the actual exam format. The questions were thoughtfully designed to reflect the updated GMAT Focus Edition content, especially in areas like Quantitative Reasoning and Data Insights. What really stood out to me was the detailed answer explanations and performance analytics provided after each test — they helped me pinpoint my weak areas and adjust my study plan accordingly.

Would make the product better:

While the overall difficulty was comparable to the real exam, I noticed that some questions — particularly in the Data Insights section — lacked the nuanced logic and layered reasoning often seen on official GMAT problems.

Overall, I think the tests are a good preparatory ground for the actual GMAT exam. The solutions were very detailed and it helped clarify many of the concepts which i would have missed during the theoretical learning.

Overall, The tests were good practice. The quant section was really helpful for clarifying the core concepts in probability as well as statistics, which is asked very frequently in the actual GMAT exam.

The DI section had some repetitive questions in subsequent mocks. That was actually not what i expected. But, Maybe i guess the company did put some core questions repeatedly to solidify those concepts in the candidates' mind.

Verbal section was also good. Especially, I used the solutions provided in the verbal section to full extent and it was helpful.

Read More

Strengths:

Affordable
Good Questions
Plenty of practice

Would make the product better:

They should work on making it more adaptive. Also the solutions to the questions are not very detailed, sometimes need to check GMAT Club for proper answers.

The platform is decent but could definitely improve in a few key areas. I feel it should be more adaptive to a student’s learning curve, as the current structure sometimes feels rigid. The solutions provided for the questions are often not detailed enough, which makes it necessary to check GMAT Club or other sources for proper explanations and clarity. Overall, my experience has been moderate—helpful but not exceptional. One positive point is that the mocks seem slightly tougher, especially in the Data Insights section, so you can reasonably expect around a 10–15 point improvement in your actual GMAT exam.

Read More

Strengths:

The questions provided are well-designed and offer good practice opportunities. The content appears to be thoughtfully structured for learning purposes, making it useful for skill development and preparation.

Would make the product better:

The major issues that need addressing are the frequent hanging/freezing problems and the lack of adaptive functionality. The software should be more responsive and stable during use. Adding adaptive features that adjust difficulty based on performance would significantly enhance the learning experience and make it more personalized for different skill levels.

This product serves its purpose as a practice tool, offering quality questions that aid in preparation and skill development. The question content is well-crafted and educational. However, the user experience is significantly hampered by technical problems - the software hangs frequently, which interrupts the learning flow and can be frustrating during study sessions. Additionally, the lack of adaptive features means it doesn't adjust to your skill level or progress, missing an opportunity to provide a more tailored learning experience. While it's functional for basic practice needs, the technical stability and adaptive capabilities need substantial improvement to make this a truly effective learning tool. It's adequate for what it offers, but there's definitely room for enhancement in both performance and smart features.

Read More