Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 13:38 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 13:38 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
26 Dec 2025, 08:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
Premise given is : In Norvia, having market-driven prices - lower energy use despite rising incomes. In Estera, having subsidized energy has higher energy use. Analysts suggest that Norvians respond more to price signals, while subsidies in Estera may discourage conservation
Conclusion for me is household energy use patterns differ because of pricing structures and subsidies.
The possible inference will be which is closest to saying that pricing structures may play a significant role in shaping household responses to energy costs
Evaluating options
A. The contrasting energy consumption patterns in Norvia and Estera suggest that pricing structures may play a significant role in shaping household responses to energy costs.
Seems correct. Aligns with premise
B. Despite rising incomes in Norvia, energy consumption per capita has declined, indicating that economic growth alone does not necessarily lead to increased energy use. Not Correct. Not the most reasonable overall inference. It only focuses on Norvia and ignores the contrast
C. If Norvia were to implement residential energy subsidies similar to Estera’s, energy consumption would likely return to pre-decline levels. Seems incorrect
Unsupported and hypothetical, prediction not justified by premise.
D. Estera’s increase in household energy use cannot be attributed to factors other than its subsidy policy. Seems Incoorect.
This is way too extreme as per me; passage never rules out other factors.
E. While energy pricing appears to influence household consumption patterns, it may not be the sole factor driving differences in energy use between Norvia and Estera. Seems incorrect
Speculative. Introduces ideas not in the passage.
Hence answer should be A.
Conclusion for me is household energy use patterns differ because of pricing structures and subsidies.
The possible inference will be which is closest to saying that pricing structures may play a significant role in shaping household responses to energy costs
Evaluating options
A. The contrasting energy consumption patterns in Norvia and Estera suggest that pricing structures may play a significant role in shaping household responses to energy costs.
Seems correct. Aligns with premise
B. Despite rising incomes in Norvia, energy consumption per capita has declined, indicating that economic growth alone does not necessarily lead to increased energy use. Not Correct. Not the most reasonable overall inference. It only focuses on Norvia and ignores the contrast
C. If Norvia were to implement residential energy subsidies similar to Estera’s, energy consumption would likely return to pre-decline levels. Seems incorrect
Unsupported and hypothetical, prediction not justified by premise.
D. Estera’s increase in household energy use cannot be attributed to factors other than its subsidy policy. Seems Incoorect.
This is way too extreme as per me; passage never rules out other factors.
E. While energy pricing appears to influence household consumption patterns, it may not be the sole factor driving differences in energy use between Norvia and Estera. Seems incorrect
Speculative. Introduces ideas not in the passage.
Hence answer should be A.
Bunuel
26 Dec 2025, 08:43
Kudos
Bookmarks
Context:
Norvia : market driven, lightly regulated energy prices, household energy use decreased over a decade despite increasing incomes.
Estera : heavily subsidized residential energy, household energy use increased.
Analyst suggests price signals encourage conservation, while subsidies discourage it
We can infer a relationship between pricing and energy consumption behaviour but not exclusive causation or prediction.
Evaluating options:
A) This can be inferred. We are safe to use "may" and "suggest" as they indicate possible correlation. This supports the relationship implied in the argument
B) We are not sure about per capital consumption and the economic growth. This is not stated or implied.
C) This is a prediction. We do not have enough information to say this
D) This states that the price is the only factor that drives consumption. We only know that there is correlation. This is too far to state
E) This can be true, but need not be. This introduces the idea of other factors which matters in deciding the consumption. But this is not implied in the argument.
Norvia : market driven, lightly regulated energy prices, household energy use decreased over a decade despite increasing incomes.
Estera : heavily subsidized residential energy, household energy use increased.
Analyst suggests price signals encourage conservation, while subsidies discourage it
We can infer a relationship between pricing and energy consumption behaviour but not exclusive causation or prediction.
Evaluating options:
A) This can be inferred. We are safe to use "may" and "suggest" as they indicate possible correlation. This supports the relationship implied in the argument
B) We are not sure about per capital consumption and the economic growth. This is not stated or implied.
C) This is a prediction. We do not have enough information to say this
D) This states that the price is the only factor that drives consumption. We only know that there is correlation. This is too far to state
E) This can be true, but need not be. This introduces the idea of other factors which matters in deciding the consumption. But this is not implied in the argument.
Bunuel
26 Dec 2025, 08:43
Kudos
Bookmarks
A -> Correct. The passage suggests that the differences between the way people behave is significantly related to the way energy is priced for the residents.
B -> Per capita cannot be judged by the passage hence this cannot be inferred.
C -> No basis for this statement can be derived from the passage as it is speculative
D -> No other factors have been mentioned but the passage conclusion says "it may have" hence it does not state this option
E -> This is similar to A but this talks about other factors that are not mentioned in the passage and hence would stand weaker to Option A
Option A
B -> Per capita cannot be judged by the passage hence this cannot be inferred.
C -> No basis for this statement can be derived from the passage as it is speculative
D -> No other factors have been mentioned but the passage conclusion says "it may have" hence it does not state this option
E -> This is similar to A but this talks about other factors that are not mentioned in the passage and hence would stand weaker to Option A
Option A
Bunuel
26 Dec 2025, 08:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
A. Relevant since what is being inferred is directly supported because we see there are different pricing regimes, consumption trends which makes it a reasonable inference.
B. Irrelevant since its basically restating what has already been said and isnt giving an inference. We also see that "per capita" hasnt been mentioned above
C. Irrelevant since its extremely speculative as its predicting a possible future outcome and there is no justification given for it here with certainty
D. Irrelevant since the passage has never ruled out other possible causes, and the "cannot be attributed" is unsupported here
E. Irrelevant since it is inferring doubts which is not stated in the given passage. The passage doesent suggest other factors here.
A.
B. Irrelevant since its basically restating what has already been said and isnt giving an inference. We also see that "per capita" hasnt been mentioned above
C. Irrelevant since its extremely speculative as its predicting a possible future outcome and there is no justification given for it here with certainty
D. Irrelevant since the passage has never ruled out other possible causes, and the "cannot be attributed" is unsupported here
E. Irrelevant since it is inferring doubts which is not stated in the given passage. The passage doesent suggest other factors here.
A.
