Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 18:46

It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 18:46

Toolkit

Practice Tests

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Apr 16
Sneak Peek: $200 Off GMAT Prep
12:00 PM EDT
-
11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 26
Score High on the GMAT with Target Test Prep
10:00 AM EDT
-
11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 27
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
11:00 AM EDT
-
12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 28
Join - GMAT Day!
08:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition - Day 2: SpeedTech Electronics m

1 2 3 4

Prakhar9802

Joined: 07 Aug 2023

Last visit: 15 Apr 2026

Posts: 63

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 1

Posts: 63

Kudos: 68

17 Dec 2024, 11:01

Kudos

Bookmarks

The question says -

A certain company manufactures 2 processors : SP and AP. AP is higher priced and advanced. It is also more cost-efficient. However, analysts say that if the company replaces SP with AP and starts selling AP at a lower price (price level of SP), this will decrease the profits.

The question is to explain why do the analysts say that doing this would decrease the profits?

If we think about the question before going to the options, we should notice that the question essentially asks us to find and point out a reason for why should we not replace SP with AP even if AP is more cost-efficient in producing and is more advanced. That means, we might have to point out some kind of a flaw in AP or an advantage in SP over AP that makes it bad for the company to replace SP with AP.

Let's look at the options -

A - This tells that the materials used in AP are cheaper and more readily available. That is all the more reason we should replace. ELIMINATE
B - If AP can be produced faster, that means more units produced and more units sold, means more profit. Moreover, the price is not in question. ELIMINATE.
C - This just restates that AP is more cost-efficient than SP. ELIMINATE
D - This states that AP's investments were recouped quickly, which shows it's cost-effectiveness. ELIMINATE
E - This is the only option that states a flaw/drawback in AP. It says that AP requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP. Which means that if we replace all SP with AP, we might need to invest more in updates and enhancements, basically post delivery service, which might cost more, hence, profits decline.

Final answer - E

Bunuel

12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

SpeedTech Electronics manufactures two types of processors: a Standard Processor (SP) and a higher-priced Advanced Processor (AP). Producing AP is actually more cost-efficient than producing SP due to advancements in technology and manufacturing processes. However, financial analysts at SpeedTech have determined that the company's profits would decrease if it combined the two product lines, offering its customers only the AP product at the price level of SP.

Assuming that transitioning from SP to AP manufacturing incurs minimal costs, which of the following, if true about SpeedTech, best explains the results of the analysts' calculation?

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

simahspm

Joined: 15 Jun 2024

Last visit: 02 Mar 2026

Posts: 3

Own Kudos:

Posts: 3

Kudos: 4

17 Dec 2024, 11:06

Kudos

Bookmarks

The answer would be B because it explains why the analysts chose to not reduce the price of AP. Since it is sale price is tied to it's percieved value, a drop in price would display a drop in value to consumers, leading to less sales.

Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

AviNFC

Joined: 31 May 2023

Last visit: 10 Apr 2026

Posts: 306

Own Kudos:

366

[1]

Given Kudos: 5

Posts: 306

Kudos: 366

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 11:16

Kudos

Bookmarks

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
Irrelevant. Reason for cost efficiency of AP is out of context.

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value. Irrelevant. Reason for higher price of AP is not required

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP. Correct. If the additional revenue is lost because of transition, then revenue will decrease

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
Initial cost is irrelevant

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP. Out of context

Answer C

SunnyPoddar

Joined: 21 Nov 2020

Last visit: 09 Apr 2026

Posts: 29

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 2

Posts: 29

Kudos: 24

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 11:27

Kudos

Bookmarks

Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

A. Paragraph has no mention of material used. Rejected.
B. This is a strong contender because it explains the disconnect between the cost savings and the potential revenue from a price drop. Park aside. (Rejected after reading C option)
C. This is the best explanation because it directly addresses the relationship between cost savings and revenue. Accepted.
D. No mention about research and development cost. Rejected.
E. No mention of impact due to frequent updates and enhancement. Rejected.

HarshaBujji

Joined: 29 Jun 2020

Last visit: 05 Apr 2026

Posts: 723

Own Kudos:

906

Given Kudos: 247

Location: India

Products:

Posts: 723

Kudos: 906

17 Dec 2024, 11:28

Kudos

Bookmarks

Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

Explain the reason why combining won't be profitable.So from pre-thinking we can say that there might e some extra cost or disadvantage involved in SP that is stopping the company to not pt for this.

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs. Didn't explain paradox
B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.Irr..
C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP. Didn't explain paradox?? Why then
D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched. Didn't explain paradox
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP. Hmm inline with our initial ideas. May be this is the problem hence they are not opting .

IMO E

All the choices

twinkle2311

Joined: 05 Nov 2021

Last visit: 21 Apr 2026

Posts: 150

Own Kudos:

178

[1]

Given Kudos: 21

Location: India

Concentration: Finance, Real Estate

Schools: ISB '26 Wharton '26

GPA: 9.041

Products:

Schools: ISB '26 Wharton '26

Posts: 150

Kudos: 178

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 11:50

Kudos

Bookmarks

The correct answer is C.

C explains that while AP is cheaper to produce, its higher price generates more revenue. Selling it at the same price as SP would lead to lost revenue, causing a decrease in profits despite the cost savings.

Here’s how we can eliminate other options:

A mentions cheaper materials, but doesn’t explain why profits would decrease if AP is sold at SP’s price.
B talks about faster output and value, but doesn’t address the profit loss from pricing AP like SP.
D discusses R&D cost recovery, which isn't related to pricing impacts on profits.
E mentions that AP requires more frequent updates, which could increase costs. It can be the case that although AP is cheaper to produce initially, the ongoing costs of updates and enhancements could offset those savings. However, this doesn’t directly explain why profits would decrease if AP were offered at the price level of SP.

Elite097

Joined: 20 Apr 2022

Last visit: 04 Feb 2026

Posts: 739

Own Kudos:

568

[1]

Given Kudos: 346

Location: India

Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27

GPA: 3.64

Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27

Posts: 739

Kudos: 568

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 12:08

Kudos

Bookmarks

A) The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.

This explains why AP is cheaper to produce, but it does not explain why profits would decrease if AP were sold at SP’s price.
The issue is not about cost efficiency but about revenue loss from lowering AP’s price.
❌ Does not address the profit decrease.

B) The production method for AP allows for faster output, but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.

This is a strong contender. If AP is traditionally sold at a higher price due to its perceived value, reducing its price to SP’s level would significantly reduce revenue.
Even though AP is cheaper to produce, the loss in revenue from selling it at SP’s lower price could outweigh the cost savings. But we are not sure about that as it could be outweighed by cost savings too
❌ This may or may not explain the profit decrease.

C) The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.

This is similar to B but focuses specifically on revenue. It states that the higher price of AP generates significantly more revenue than the cost savings from efficient production.
If AP is sold at SP’s price, the revenue advantage disappears, leading to a drop in profits.
✅ This also explains the profit decrease.

D) The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.

This explains how R&D costs were covered but says nothing about the impact of lowering AP’s price on profits.
❌ Irrelevant to the profit decrease scenario.
E) While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.

This introduces a new cost (frequent updates) for AP but does not explain why profits drop when AP is sold at SP’s price.
❌ Does not directly address the profit decrease.

Comparison of B and C
Both B and C explain why profits would decrease if AP were sold at SP’s price. However:

B highlights the perceived value of AP, which justifies its higher price. Lowering the price erodes this perceived value and reduces revenue.
C focuses on the quantitative aspect: the revenue from selling AP at a higher price far exceeds the cost savings.
While both are valid, C is slightly clearer and more direct in addressing the profit issue.

Ans C

Mantrix

Joined: 13 May 2023

Last visit: 20 Apr 2026

Posts: 253

Own Kudos:

132

Given Kudos: 44

Location: India

Schools: MiM '26 HEC MiM '26 ESSEC MiM '26 (A) Imperial (A) IESE

GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q87 V75 DI77 Verified score

GMAT Focus 2: 635 Q82 V82 DI80 Verified score

GPA: 9

Schools: MiM '26 HEC MiM '26 ESSEC MiM '26 (A) Imperial (A) IESE

GMAT Focus 2: 635 Q82 V82 DI80 Verified score

Posts: 253

Kudos: 132

17 Dec 2024, 12:21

Kudos

Bookmarks

P1: Two types of processors: (SP) and (AP).
P2: Producing AP is actually more cost-efficient than producing SP
P3: the financial analysts determined profits will decrease if company offer its customers only the AP product at the price level of SP.

Assuming that transitioning from SP to AP manufacturing incurs minimal costs, which of the following, if true about SpeedTech, best explains the results of the analysts' calculation?

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
(we are not concerned about the why initial cost reduced)

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
(If we combine, both, the perceived value will be down, then SP will be down, then profit will decrease) answer

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP. (if it exceeds the cost savings, then also we can't say that)

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
(Not Relevant)

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.
(it is same as before, so wont affect later profit)

bellsprout24

Joined: 05 Dec 2024

Last visit: 29 Mar 2026

Posts: 57

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 2

Posts: 57

Kudos: 85

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 12:45

Kudos

Bookmarks

Answer is C.

We need a statement that supports the conclusion that profits would decrease if the price of AP were reduced.

A. Incorrect - reiterates premise that AP is more cost-efficient to produce and doesn't address a chance in pricing.

B. Incorrect - reiterates premise that AP is higher-priced and faster output does not address a change in pricing.

C. Correct - supports conclusion that profits would decrease if price of AP were reduced since current revenue of AP at higher price level significantly exceeds cost savings, so the revenue loss from lowering AP to the price of SP would not be outweighed by cost savings from AP.

D. Incorrect - doesn't address change in pricing.

E. Incorrect - doesn't address change in pricing.

Supriyo7090

Joined: 21 Dec 2023

Last visit: 13 Apr 2026

Posts: 10

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 14

Posts: 10

Kudos: 3

17 Dec 2024, 12:57

Kudos

Bookmarks

This question revolves around an apparent paradox: producing the Advanced Processor (AP) is more cost-efficient than producing the Standard Processor (SP), yet replacing SP with AP (at SP price levels) would decrease profits. The task is to identify the factor that explains why this would happen, given the minimal costs of transitioning from SP to AP.
[hr]
Key Points to Keep in Mind:

Transition Costs: These are minimal, so the explanation must not focus on transitioning expenses.
Profit Equation: Profit is determined by revenue minus cost. Since AP is more cost-efficient, the issue must lie in revenue.
Price-Level Constraint: The AP would be sold at the SP’s lower price level, affecting profitability.

[hr]
Answer Choices Analysis:
(A) The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.

While this explains why AP is cheaper to produce, it does not address why profits would decrease if AP replaced SP at the lower price.
Eliminate (A).

[hr]
(B) The production method for AP allows for faster output, but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.

This partially explains why AP is profitable when sold at a higher price, but it does not clarify why profits drop when AP is sold at SP’s lower price. Faster output does not affect the revenue shortfall.
Eliminate (B).

[hr]
(C) The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.

Correct Answer. If AP’s current profitability comes primarily from its higher price, then selling it at SP’s lower price would reduce revenue by more than the cost savings, leading to lower profits. This directly explains the analysts’ conclusion.
Keep (C).

[hr]
(D) The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.

While this explains why AP was initially profitable, it does not address the impact of switching AP to SP’s price level on current or future profitability.
Eliminate (D).

[hr]
(E) While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.

Frequent updates could increase costs slightly, but the analysts specifically noted AP is more cost-efficient than SP. This does not explain why selling AP at SP’s price level would reduce profits.
Eliminate (E).

[hr]
Final Answer:
(C) The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
[hr]
The profitability of a product depends on both its production costs and the revenue it generates. While the Advanced Processor (AP) is more cost-efficient than the Standard Processor (SP), the analysts’ calculations show that selling AP at SP’s price level would decrease profits. This indicates that AP’s higher revenue from being sold at a premium price contributes more to profits than the savings from its cost-efficiency. Lowering AP’s price to match SP’s price would reduce revenue by an amount that outweighs the production cost savings, leading to a drop in overall profits. Thus, (C)best explains the analysts’ findings.

riyasali

Joined: 09 Aug 2024

Last visit: 24 Jan 2026

Posts: 26

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 126

Posts: 26

Kudos: 26

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 12:58

Kudos

Bookmarks

Producing AP is actually more cost-efficient than producing SP and AP is also priced higher. But still the conclusion states that "the company's profits would decrease if it combined the two product lines, offering its customers only the AP product at the price level of SP" which indicates that either there are other factors which make the AP less profitable or it is the Selling price which when decreases is not able to maintain the profits.

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
Does not help explain the paradox. Eliminate

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
Gives additional evidence but does not help explain the paradox. Eliminate

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
This states that due to increased SP of AP it was profitable and if its SP is reduced, will not be able to maintain those profits. keep

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
Does not help explain the paradox. Eliminate

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.
Does not provide information about the profitability. Eliminate

rns2812

Joined: 10 Nov 2024

Last visit: 28 Aug 2025

Posts: 50

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 14

Posts: 50

Kudos: 51

17 Dec 2024, 13:05

Kudos

Bookmarks

Ask : Why do analysts think having only AP at price SP would decrease profit despite AP being low cost to produce?

Options :
A - Explains why AP might be cheaper than SP
B - AP is more expensive than SP due to perceived value, therefore selling it at SP price might be reason for decreasing profits - Explains why the profits are reduced
C - Higher priced AP is better, compared to the low production costs by selling AP compared to selling SP - doesn't explain the findings
D - People were interested in AP and intially bought it - Doesn't explain why profits would reduce
E - Irrelevant to the discussion

OPTION B

Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

Shruuuu

Joined: 21 Nov 2023

Last visit: 19 Jan 2026

Posts: 70

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 99

Location: India

Schools: ISB '27 (A)

GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78 Verified score

Schools: ISB '27 (A)

GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78 Verified score

Posts: 70

Kudos: 95

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 13:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

To find the best explanation for the financial analysts statement, we eliminate the options one by one -

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs - This tells us that switching to AP is fruitful which is opposite of what we want - Eliminate

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value - We already know that the sale price of AP is higher from the argument so it being higher due to perceived value doesn't help us - Eliminate

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP - This tells us that profit from AP > profit from SP & if we price the AP to SP prices; it would lead to decrease in the profits. This fits - Keep

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched - R&D costs being recouped has nothing to do with the argument - Eliminate

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP - This tells us that AP leads to additional cost but doesn't provide us for the reason of why pricing AP at SP pricing would lead to profit reduction - Eliminate

IMO C

Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

mpp01

Joined: 13 Dec 2024

Last visit: 08 Jun 2025

Posts: 49

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 9

Location: Spain

Posts: 49

Kudos: 48

17 Dec 2024, 14:46

Kudos

Bookmarks

The answer is best found by going Wrong to Right. In this case Eliminate answers E, D, C in a first look, as they are talking about completely different things. Then choose among the "best fit" option, I understand answer A is more convenient in this case since address the competitive advantage of AP over SP even if sold at the same price.

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.

BatrickPatemann

Joined: 29 May 2024

Last visit: 15 Apr 2026

Posts: 64

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 153

Location: Spain

Schools: HEC (D) ESSEC MiF '26 (S)

GPA: 6.74

Schools: HEC (D) ESSEC MiF '26 (S)

Posts: 64

Kudos: 55

17 Dec 2024, 15:09

Kudos

Bookmarks

Assuming that transitioning from SP to AP manufacturing incurs minimal costs, which of the following, if true about SpeedTech, best explains the results of the analysts' calculation?

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.

For this question you must first understand the analysts' calculation implications. Here is about a competitive advantage, that even selling at lower prices or SP prices, AP would be more efficient for costs, and thus more profitable, combined with the fact that producing both wouldn't be benefitial.

The only answer that satisfies this is A, which talks about this competitive advantage, meanwhile C talks about revenue, but the increased profitability might arise from cutting costs, not from rising revenue.

Arsh001

Joined: 09 Mar 2023

Last visit: 23 Feb 2026

Posts: 22

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 310

Posts: 22

Kudos: 10

17 Dec 2024, 15:13

Kudos

Bookmarks

I think B as it directly relates to the conclusion and tells us why it will lead to a decrease in sales whereas it is difficult to infer that from option E

Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

Kerim21

Joined: 04 Nov 2024

Last visit: 07 Jan 2025

Posts: 11

Own Kudos:

Posts: 11

Kudos: 14

17 Dec 2024, 16:40

Kudos

Bookmarks

A) This explains why AP is cheaper to produce but does not address the impact of selling AP at SP prices on profits.
B) This directly explains that AP’s higher perceived value drives profitability, and selling it at SP prices would harm revenue.
C) This highlights AP’s profitability but lacks the emphasis on perceived value and pricing strategy that makes B stronger.
D) This provides historical context about AP’s success but does not explain the analysts’ findings about pricing and profitability.
E) This mentions additional costs for AP but does not explain the financial harm caused by selling AP at SP prices.

Therefore, the correct answer is B.

A) The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.This explains why AP is cheaper to produce but does not address the impact of selling AP at SP prices on profits.B) The production method for AP allows for faster output, but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.This directly explains that AP’s higher perceived value drives profitability, and selling it at SP prices would harm revenue.C) The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.This highlights AP’s profitability but lacks the emphasis on perceived value and pricing strategy that makes B stronger.D) The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.This provides historical context about AP’s success but does not explain the analysts’ findings about pricing and profitability.E) While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.This mentions additional costs for AP but does not explain the financial harm caused by selling AP at SP prices.Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

GraCoder

Joined: 15 Dec 2024

Last visit: 18 Jan 2026

Posts: 65

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 19

Posts: 65

Kudos: 70

17 Dec 2024, 17:28

Kudos

Bookmarks

Bunuel

This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

A. As stated earlier, there is a negligible difference in manufacturing cost of either of the processor, hence this shouldn't be the analyst's concern.
B. Since it's perceived to be more valuable people are ready to pay a premium on it, reducing the sales price of it could be detrimental for the company's profit.
C. Again the manufacturing and production have a little say here.
D. It's not an initial breakout trend, this option just distorts the fact.
E. If this was the case, then it would rather profit the company since customers would then have to pay for these updates thereby increasing the revenue, which doesn't align with the analyst's viewpoint.

andreagonzalez2k

Joined: 15 Feb 2021

Last visit: 26 Jul 2025

Posts: 308

Own Kudos:

503

[1]

Given Kudos: 14

Posts: 308

Kudos: 503

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 18:45

Kudos

Bookmarks

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
This explanation doesn't fully address why profits would decrease when combining the two product lines at the SP price level. INCORRECT

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
Perceived value directly influences price, and lowering the price of AP to match the SP price would likely undermine the perceived value of the AP, resulting in lower revenue. Since the cost savings from AP production efficiency might not be enough to make up for the reduced revenue from the lower price, this could explain why the analysts calculate decreased profits. Tempting but option C is better. INCORRECT

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
While the cost to produce AP is lower, the higher price point results in a greater revenue per unit. If SpeedTech were to sell AP at the price of SP (a lower price), the revenue per unit would drop, possibly leading to a decrease in overall profits, even though the manufacturing costs are lower. This seems like a plausible reason for the analysts' finding. CORRECT

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
The question is about pricing and revenue, and this option doesn’t directly explain the impact of price on profits. INCORRECT

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.
While this could increase ongoing costs, the question specifically asks about why offering AP at the SP price would decrease profits. The issue seems to be more about pricing and the relationship between cost savings and revenue, rather than the long-term cost of maintaining AP. INCORRECT

IMO C

LastHero

Joined: 15 Dec 2024

Last visit: 12 Dec 2025

Posts: 134

Own Kudos:

147

[1]

Given Kudos: 1

Posts: 134

Kudos: 147

[1]

17 Dec 2024, 19:50

Kudos

Bookmarks

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
This option doesn't directly explain the profit loss when combining the two product lines at a lower price.

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
If SpeedTech were to offer AP at the SP price level, the perceived value of the product could be undermined, and the company might not be able to generate as much revenue. But this is a possibilit, not a certainty.

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP. CORRECT ANSWER
This option suggests that revenue from the higher price of AP is so significant that it exceeds the cost savings from the more efficient production. If this is the case, then reducing the price of AP to match SP’s price could result in lower revenue per unit, and thus lower overall profits. "Significantly exceeds" is the key to say that this is te correct option.

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
This does not explain the analysts' finding that offering AP at the SP price level would decrease profits.

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.
This answer suggests that although AP is more cost-effective to produce, the need for frequent updates and enhancements could increase ongoing costs, which might affect long-term profitability. However, the question focuses on the immediate impact of offering AP at the SP price level, and this option doesn’t directly explain why such a pricing decision would lead to decreased profits in the short term.

Answer C