The question says -
A certain company manufactures 2 processors : SP and AP. AP is higher priced and advanced. It is also more cost-efficient. However, analysts say that if the company replaces SP with AP and starts selling AP at a lower price (price level of SP), this will decrease the profits.
The question is to explain why do the analysts say that doing this would decrease the profits?
If we think about the question before going to the options, we should notice that the question essentially asks us to find and point out a reason for why should we not replace SP with AP even if AP is more cost-efficient in producing and is more advanced. That means, we might have to point out some kind of a flaw in AP or an advantage in SP over AP that makes it bad for the company to replace SP with AP.
Let's look at the options -
A - This tells that the materials used in AP are cheaper and more readily available. That is all the more reason we should replace. ELIMINATE
B - If AP can be produced faster, that means more units produced and more units sold, means more profit. Moreover, the price is not in question. ELIMINATE.
C - This just restates that AP is more cost-efficient than SP. ELIMINATE
D - This states that AP's investments were recouped quickly, which shows it's cost-effectiveness. ELIMINATE
E - This is the only option that states a flaw/drawback in AP. It says that AP requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP. Which means that if we replace all SP with AP, we might need to invest more in updates and enhancements, basically post delivery service, which might cost more, hence, profits decline.
Final answer - E
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of PrizesSpeedTech Electronics manufactures two types of processors: a Standard Processor (SP) and a higher-priced Advanced Processor (AP). Producing AP is actually more cost-efficient than producing SP due to advancements in technology and manufacturing processes. However, financial analysts at SpeedTech have determined that the company's profits would decrease if it combined the two product lines, offering its customers only the AP product at the price level of SP.
Assuming that transitioning from SP to AP manufacturing incurs minimal costs, which of the following, if true about SpeedTech, best explains the results of the analysts' calculation?
A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.