12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition - Day 2: SpeedTech Electronics m

Let's evaluate each statement:

(A) The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
-> While AP is cheaper to produce, this doesn't explain why profits would decrease if AP replaced SP at the lower SP price. It just restates that AP is cost-efficient to produce.

(B) The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
-> This hints at why AP is priced higher, but it doesn’t directly explain why overall profits would drop if AP were sold at SP’s price.

(C) The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
-> This is the correct answer because it clarifies that the higher selling price of AP provides substantial profit. If sold at SP's lower price, the lost revenue would outweigh the cost savings, thus reducing overall profits.

(D) The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
-> This might be true, but it doesn't explain why profits would decrease if AP were sold at SP’s price. R&D costs are a past expense, not directly tied to current profitability.

(E) While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.
-> This doesn’t help us understand why profits would drop if AP were sold at SP’s price point. Frequent updates might affect long-term cost, but it does not directly relate to the analysts’ calculation.

The answer imo is C

SpeedTech Electronics manufactures two types of processors: a Standard Processor (SP) and a higher-priced Advanced Processor (AP). Producing AP is actually more cost-efficient than producing SP due to advancements in technology and manufacturing processes. However, financial analysts at SpeedTech have determined that the company's profits would decrease if it combined the two product lines, offering its customers only the AP product at the price level of SP.

Assuming that transitioning from SP to AP manufacturing incurs minimal costs, which of the following, if true about SpeedTech, best explains the results of the analysts' calculation?

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.
D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.

The correct answer is E.


The prompt states that while AP is higher priced than SP, AP is more cost efficient to produce. However, analysts say that if the company sold AP at the price of SP, the company;s profits would decrease. This is counter intuitive since one would assume that because AP is more cost efficient than SP to produce, the cost price of AP wouldn't be a factor if they sold AP at the selling price of SP.

In this case, the only factor that can reduce profit is that if the total revenue earned from AP would be lower than the total revenue earned from SP. So, we need to find an answer that either shows that the revenue of AP will be lower than that of SP or something else that shows the profit will be hampered.

(A) The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.
This talks about the cost of AP but doesn't mention the impact on revenue or profits.

(B) The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.
Here, the faster output suggests that consumers would be drawn towards the processor that produces faster output. Note that the sale price of AP has no impact since AP will be sold at the price of SP. However, the above prompt doesn't talk about the impact on profits. If anything, it says that revenue will increase upon choosing AP.

(C) The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP
Similar explanation as B

(D) The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.
It seems irrelevant to me

(E) While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.
Now here, the prompt mentions that AP requires more updates and enhancements than SP. This means that even though the initial production of AP is cost efficient, the subsequent maintenance of AP will harm the cost of the company, thereby, reducing the profits.

The correct answer is B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.

Explanation: If SpeedTech were to offer AP at the SP price, the company would lose the revenue advantage of pricing AP higher. Even though AP is more cost-efficient to produce, its higher price reflects its perceived value in the market. By combining the lines and lowering AP's price to SP's level, SpeedTech sacrifices this pricing premium, leading to a decrease in overall profits despite cost savings.

Option A explains why AP is cost-efficient but does not address the impact on profits when transitioning to SP pricing. It fails to explain why profits would decrease if only AP is offered.

Option C states that revenue from AP's higher price exceeds cost savings, but it does not explain why profits would decrease if AP is priced at SP's level. Option B explains this more directly.

Option D is irrelevant to the profitability calculation. It does not address why combining the lines and offering AP at SP's price would reduce profits.

Option E suggests that AP has ongoing costs for updates but does not explain why offering AP at SP's price would reduce profits. The calculation focuses on pricing and revenue, not maintenance costs.

The correct answer is B because it best explains why offering AP at SP's price would reduce profits. SpeedTech would lose the pricing premium of AP, which outweighs the production cost savings.

Option B- It says that Selling price of AP is set higher. So, naturally selling AP at SP's price might still be profitable, it has will reduce the profit

Option B is talking about sale price of AP let us say for quality it is been marked higher that is manufacturing cost is 100 $ but SP is 1000$ but now since we are selling it at around reduced price of SP let us 500$ so obviously the profit will decrease.
so a better and clear answer among all.

Option C is talking about revenue but revenue can be fullfileed let us say before it was selling 5 products of AP at 1000$ so revenue is 5000$ but after lowering the price the sale has increase let us now 20 productus so revenue can still be matched at lower price but what about profit ?
hence B clearly.

The correct answer is E

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs. - This supports the part that AP is more cost-efficient to produce. But does not discuss analysts' calculations - Out

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value. - The passage talks about offering AP to customers at the price level of SP. But this point says that AP is priced higher - Out

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP. - The passage talks about offering AP to customers at the price level of SP. But this point says that AP is priced higher - Out

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched. - Out of context - Out

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce,it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP. - This explains that AP will need additional costs for more frequent updates and enhancements. Selling AP at the price level of SP will reduce profits because of these additional costs which were not required in SP - Hence, the correct answer

QS: Explain the paradox.

Argument: STE---> SP and AP.
AP>>>SP in costs (since advancements in tech and prod.)!
HOWEVER
If AP=SP in selling -----> Decreased profit!

(So there has to be something unique for AP produced in sold in higher price)
A)Materials for AP is cheaper than the ones for SP---> Weakens. OUT
B)Trad. Perceived value----> higher sale price. Keep it
C)AP>>>SP. Just describes additional info in the production not in the sale! OUT
D)R&D costs are covered in initial period? OUT
E)AP < SP in updates&enhancements. Still not explains the higher selling price! OUT

B is correct

We have to find a reason why combining the two product lines would decrease company profits.

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs.

The information provided in the option is not relevant. The details do not tell us as to why combining the two product lines would decrease company profits. We can eliminate this option.

The information provided in the option is not relevant. The details do not tell us as to why why combining the two product lines would decrease company profits. We can eliminate this option.

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value.

This option only touches upon one of the product of the two mentioned. While we know that the value of AP has been set higher, we are not aware how does that offset any costs and results to profits. Hence, the information is not relevant.

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.

This is a stronger option in comparison to Option B. We know decreasing the cost of AP will reduce the revenue and hence we will not be able to offset the cost saving. We can keep this option.

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched.

Out of scope. The information doesn't help determine why combining the two product lines would decrease company profits. We can eliminate this option.

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.

Out of scope. The information doesn't help determine why combining the two product lines would decrease company profits. We can eliminate this option.

Option C

My choice is E
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP.
=> Profit = Rev - Cost. Statement E indicates that updates and enhancements may increase cost base and thus eat into Profit

We know that AP has a higher sales price than SP. Also, it's more cost effective (which means, the difference between its price and cost is higher) - and it's important to remember that yes, costs are lower 'due to advancements in technology and manufacturing processes', but the final sales price is just as important a contributor. Therefore, the calculation that AP would not be that profitable if it was the only product and its price was lowered seems reasonable if we consider that the higher price is a highly significant contributor to the reported cost efficiency.

A and D both speak about initial cost reduction and recovery, which makes them irrelevant. Eliminate.

B sheds more light on pricing and the background of how AP is produced, but doesn't really help with SP comparison. Eliminate.

E mentions another issue with AP, without providing any income-related estimate, so is unhelpful. Eliminate.

Therefore, the right answer is C, as it hits the nail on the head and, as predicted, specifically highlights that high price is an inherent contributor, and a much more important one, to cost efficiency rather than the actual production cheapness.

The question is asking about the explanation over "the profit decline" given minimal cost in transition from SP to AP
Profit = Revenue (Price * Quantity) - Cost
So I will focus on the revenue side for the potential explanation

A) Material cheaper is related to cost side, not revenue side (x)
B) Price difference does not directly address why profit decline (x)
C) Revenue generated from AP > Cost saving = profit increase but "offer AP at the price level of SP which is lower" can explain why the profit decline (✔)
D) R&D cost is related to cost side, not revenue side (x)
E) Frequent update and enhancement is an additional cost exposure related to cost side, not revenue side (x)

Therefore the answer is C

Hi All,

According to me,

Conclusion: Analyst statement - the company's profits would decrease if it combined the two product lines, offering its customers only the AP product at the price level of SP.

Question Stem: Need to strengthen the Analyst's argument.

Option Analysis:

A) Doesnt address why profits will decrease if AP are sold at the price of SP.

B) The precived value for AP was higher, therefore is the price is reduced to SP the profits will decrease . Does strengthen the argument.

C) If price for AP and CP are kept the same, then Revenue will reduce drastically , more that what the company would have saved from cost saving. Revenue drop meaning lower profits hence directly s[color=#001d35]trengthening the Analyst's argument. This is correct as it strengthen more than option B[/color]

D)No impact on the argument.

E)No impact on the argument.


Ans Option C

Ans: C

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs
This statement is giving the reason as to why the manufacturing cost for AP is lower than the manufacturing cost for SP but it is not giving an explanation for the financial analysts calculation.

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value
Again it is just giving a reason as to why the value for AP is set higher than SP but not the explanation for the financial analysts calculation.

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP
This gives an explanation for the financial analysts calculation. The statement of the analyst means that the profit that the company makes from selling the AP and SP at the price that it being sold at is more because the company is making extra profit by selling it at a higher price and would lose it if sold at the same price and this statement explains the same that the revenue generated from the higher priced AP outweighs the cost savings from its more efficient production.

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched
Not relevant. This statement just mentions that the R&D cost for AP was recouped quickly because of the high interest when it was launched

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP
Again Not relevant. The passage just mentions the initial selling price of AP and SP and does not mention anywhere about enhancements and updates and the cost related to that.

Hence, the correct option is C

Hi Everyone

Our Goal: Explain the Discrepancy here.
We are in the manufacture shoes in that question.
2 Semiconductors AP&SP.
SP is cheaper AND AP is cost efficient for producing.

Combining product: Only AP at SP Price => Decrease profit
Why is that?

A - While it explains why AP is cost-efficient to produce, it doesn’t address why switching to selling only AP at SP prices would reduce profits. Eliminate
B - This highlights why AP is sold at a higher price due to perceived value but doesn’t explain why lowering its price to SP levels would harm profits. Eliminate
C - If AP’s higher sale price generates significant revenue that outweighs the cost savings of producing it, lowering its price to SP levels would reduce overall profits. Correct
D - This explains how R&D costs for AP were recovered but doesn’t address the profit. Eliminate
E - While it mentions that AP requires more frequent updates, it doesn’t directly explain why profits would decline if sold at SP price levels. Eliminate.

Our Answer is C

To strengthen analysts calculation - we need to strengthen "However, financial analysts at SpeedTech have determined that the company's profits would decrease if it combined the two product lines, offering its customers only the AP product at the price level of SP."

Lets evaluate options -

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs. - It already states transitioning cost is minimal. - Irrelevant.

B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value. - This looks good if they sold at lower price SpeedTech would lose the premium revenue that justifies its profitability. - Lets keep it.

C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP. - But doesn't explain why profits would decrease? Lets eliminate.

D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched. - Interest? How does that affect profit? Irrelevant.

E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP. - Potential problem of product but does not explain why offering AP at SP's price would reduce profits overall. - Irrelevant.

Answer is B.

(C)The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP.

This directly explains the profit reduction: selling AP at the SP price would erode a significant portion of revenue. Even though AP is cheaper to produce, the loss of revenue far outweighs the cost savings. This ties the pricing and profitability dynamics together clearly and precisely.

For addressing this particular paradox question, we need to first find a way to address the analysis of the financial analysts at SpeedTech who have determined that the company's profits would decrease. Going through the options one by one:

A. The materials used in AP are more readily available and cheaper than those used in SP, which initially reduced manufacturing costs - This option does not address the paradox but rather deepens it because if the materials are more readily available & cheaper we should see reduced costs & henceforth increased profits.
B. The production method for AP allows for faster output but the sale price for AP has traditionally been set higher due to perceived value - This has no effect on the argument as this is a general statement that provides further context about the production process but does not address the issue of decreased profits
C. The revenue generated from the higher-priced AP significantly exceeds the cost savings from its more efficient production compared to SP-This further deepens the paradox as if AP revenues exceeds cost savings from SP, profits should ideally increase. We need to find something that makes us doubt that situation.
D. The research and development costs for developing AP were recouped quickly due to initial high interest when it was first launched-What happened in the past is irrelevant to the issue at hand & this statement is a general statement that does not address the paradox in question.
E. While AP is more cost-effective to produce, it requires more frequent updates and enhancements than SP-This helps us explain the paradox. If cost savings are offset by increases in updates & enhancements then the projected profits could reduce as our costs would increase to address the same.

Hence the answer to this question is option (E).