riverripper
#4 Kellogg (won surveys and employment due to employment rates)
#5 GSB (won selectivity, 2nd in employment but third in surveys)
#6 MIT (employment %'s and GMAT cost it 5 to GSB)
#7 Tuck (employment stats dominated Haas)
#8 Haas (won surveys and selectivity but lost the war)
I know what you're trying to do river... keeping Kellogg and Haas as far apart as possible. I'm onto you now.

But interesting thought is, Haas and Stanford suffer in the employment stats partly because there are a lot more entrepreneurs and "tree-huggers" in those two schools, who do not go the normal MC/Banking route. Haas probably has the lowest percentage of people going the traditional route (MC/IB) compared to most top schools, if you look at the "pie charts" of where people get their first jobs out of school. That alone could hurt the salary and placement stats, as entrepreneurship starts with lower salary and a lot of the CSR/non-profit stuff also pulls it down. Just my 2 cents, and another reason why rankings are not the be all and end all of everything, like mNeo said.
Wow, Duke used to be a perennial top 10... what happened???
CBS is the only M7 school that keeps on using M7... I wonder why.