Last visit was: 15 Jul 2025, 16:37 It is currently 15 Jul 2025, 16:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Evaluate Argument|                                 
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 July 2025
Posts: 7,356
Own Kudos:
68,557
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,968
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,356
Kudos: 68,557
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Iotaa
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2020
Last visit: 15 Mar 2023
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Location: India
Posts: 135
Kudos: 152
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
zhanbo
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Last visit: 07 Jul 2024
Posts: 1,468
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,468
Kudos: 2,418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
LeonHsu
Joined: 07 Jul 2023
Last visit: 03 Oct 2023
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 12
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
GMAT 2: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In my opinion, (B) is just like any other OAs that present an analogy between the object in question and a similar thing. According to my experience, I would not rush to cross (B), though (B) is extremely weak in argument. However, we should always choose the most correct one in GMAT, so I would always leave this option till the last moment. If there weren't any better option, I would then choose (B).
User avatar
temulenbatbayr90
Joined: 06 Sep 2022
Last visit: 25 Jun 2025
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Products:
Posts: 45
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why this is the correct answer 
User avatar
raj-boro
Joined: 10 Jun 2024
Last visit: 03 Apr 2025
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What if others of the closely related group of plants producing histidine in large quantities doesnt grow in metal-rich soils?

egmat
harishbiyani8888
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the growth of this herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Hence, the herb's high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether the herb can thrive in soil that does not have high concentrations of the toxic metals

(B) Whether others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities

(C) Whether the herb's high level of histidine production is associated with an unusually low level of production of some other amino acid

(D) Whether growing the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over time, reduce their concentrations in the soil

(E) Whether the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity



Solution
passage analysis
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants.
    There is a certain herb that belongs to a group of closely related plants. These plants grow abundantly in soils which have high concentrations of metals. For most other plants, this high metallic content of the soil is toxic/poisonous.

Agronomists studying the growth of this herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test - tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert.
    Agronomists, who are studying the growth of this herb, have discovered that it produces histidine in large amounts. Histidine is an amino acid. In test-tube experiments, histidine acts on the metals present in the soil and leaves them inactive.

Hence, the herb's high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils.
    Therefore, the presence of histidine in large amounts must be the main factor that helps the herb grow in metal-rich soils.

Conclusion:
A certain herb's high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils
Based on the fact that:
It produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert


pre-thinking
Falsification question
In what scenario will the herb's high histidine production not be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils?
Given that →herb that belongs to a group of closely related plants
→These plants thrive in soils that have high concentrations of metals.
→For most other plants, this high metallic content of the soil is toxic.
→this herb produces histidine in large amounts
→In test-tube experiments, histidine acts on the metals present in the soil and leaves them inactive

Thought Process
Agronomists credit the production of histidine in large quantities in the herb to be the single most important factor in the survival of the herb in soils that have high metallic content, because most other plants would not grow in such soils. But the other plants of the group to which this herb belongs also grow in the same metallic soil. Possibly then if histidine is responsible for the growth of this herb, then it must be responsible for the survival of the related plants also. But do those plants produce histidine?

Falsification condition#1
What if there were present some other chemicals in higher quantities instead of histidine in the other plants of the group of plants to which this herb belonged?
In that case, it is possible that those chemicals could be responsible for the survival of that group of related plants.

Assumption#1
The other closely related plants also have histidine in similar large amounts.

Falsification condition#2
What if the other closely related plants had evolved certain adaptations that helped them to survive the toxicity of the soil?
In that case, the survival could be attributed mostly to those adaptations (say special roots that help nullify toxicity)

Assumption#2
The group of closely related plants does not have any special adaptations that can be considered as key survival tools.

Answer Choice Analysis

A
The conclusion is that histidine is the reason the herb can grow in toxic soil. What histidine does in non-toxic soil is not of concern here.

Hence, this option is incorrect.

B
The answer to this evaluate question is in line with our pre-thinking assumption#1

Let us put it through the variance test

Yes- others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities
This strengthens our belief in the conclusion

No- others of the closely related group of plants do not produce histidine in large quantities
This weakens our belief in the conclusion. If the other plants of the same group do not produce histidine in large amounts and yet survive in the high metallic soil, then something other than histidine is the key factor helping them survive.

Hence, this is the correct choice.

C
Let us say because of histidine, some other amino acid is impacted in its production. But does that prove that histidine is or is not the key factor behind the growth. Do we know whether this other amino acid which when produced at unusually low levels has any connection with the growth of the herb? No.

Hence, it is not the correct answer.

D
Our goal is to evaluate the causality of growth in toxic soil. What happens to soil once the plant grows is not of importance to the conclusion.

Hence, not the correct option.

E
Say if the answer is yes. Does that answer my query as to whether histidine was in the first place, not responsible in inhibiting the toxicity of the soil and helping the herb thrive? In the growing stage, histidine was present in certain concentrations. We are concerned with that stage of the herb. And this option neither confirms nor refutes the strength of this argument

Hence, this is not the correct option.
User avatar
MohdZaidKhan
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 28 Nov 2024
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 23
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
X cause Y ... assumes that
1. only X causes Y , no other thing cause Y .
2. Y does not cause X .
Option B if answered No, indicates that some other thing is causing Y(thriving in metal rich soil) and not X(the histidine). and it shatters the necessary assumption no. 1 here .

Option B is the answer
User avatar
MohdZaidKhan
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 28 Nov 2024
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 23
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is not possible , because histidine cause inertness of metals , is given as fact .
raj-boro
What if others of the closely related group of plants producing histidine in large quantities doesnt grow in metal-rich soils?

egmat
harishbiyani8888
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the growth of this herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Hence, the herb's high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether the herb can thrive in soil that does not have high concentrations of the toxic metals

(B) Whether others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities

(C) Whether the herb's high level of histidine production is associated with an unusually low level of production of some other amino acid

(D) Whether growing the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over time, reduce their concentrations in the soil

(E) Whether the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity



Solution
passage analysis
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants.
    There is a certain herb that belongs to a group of closely related plants. These plants grow abundantly in soils which have high concentrations of metals. For most other plants, this high metallic content of the soil is toxic/poisonous.

Agronomists studying the growth of this herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test - tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert.
    Agronomists, who are studying the growth of this herb, have discovered that it produces histidine in large amounts. Histidine is an amino acid. In test-tube experiments, histidine acts on the metals present in the soil and leaves them inactive.

Hence, the herb's high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils.
    Therefore, the presence of histidine in large amounts must be the main factor that helps the herb grow in metal-rich soils.

Conclusion:
A certain herb's high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils
Based on the fact that:
It produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert


pre-thinking
Falsification question
In what scenario will the herb's high histidine production not be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils?
Given that →herb that belongs to a group of closely related plants
→These plants thrive in soils that have high concentrations of metals.
→For most other plants, this high metallic content of the soil is toxic.
→this herb produces histidine in large amounts
→In test-tube experiments, histidine acts on the metals present in the soil and leaves them inactive

Thought Process
Agronomists credit the production of histidine in large quantities in the herb to be the single most important factor in the survival of the herb in soils that have high metallic content, because most other plants would not grow in such soils. But the other plants of the group to which this herb belongs also grow in the same metallic soil. Possibly then if histidine is responsible for the growth of this herb, then it must be responsible for the survival of the related plants also. But do those plants produce histidine?

Falsification condition#1
What if there were present some other chemicals in higher quantities instead of histidine in the other plants of the group of plants to which this herb belonged?
In that case, it is possible that those chemicals could be responsible for the survival of that group of related plants.

Assumption#1
The other closely related plants also have histidine in similar large amounts.

Falsification condition#2
What if the other closely related plants had evolved certain adaptations that helped them to survive the toxicity of the soil?
In that case, the survival could be attributed mostly to those adaptations (say special roots that help nullify toxicity)

Assumption#2
The group of closely related plants does not have any special adaptations that can be considered as key survival tools.

Answer Choice Analysis

A
The conclusion is that histidine is the reason the herb can grow in toxic soil. What histidine does in non-toxic soil is not of concern here.

Hence, this option is incorrect.

B
The answer to this evaluate question is in line with our pre-thinking assumption#1

Let us put it through the variance test

Yes- others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities
This strengthens our belief in the conclusion

No- others of the closely related group of plants do not produce histidine in large quantities
This weakens our belief in the conclusion. If the other plants of the same group do not produce histidine in large amounts and yet survive in the high metallic soil, then something other than histidine is the key factor helping them survive.

Hence, this is the correct choice.

C
Let us say because of histidine, some other amino acid is impacted in its production. But does that prove that histidine is or is not the key factor behind the growth. Do we know whether this other amino acid which when produced at unusually low levels has any connection with the growth of the herb? No.

Hence, it is not the correct answer.

D
Our goal is to evaluate the causality of growth in toxic soil. What happens to soil once the plant grows is not of importance to the conclusion.

Hence, not the correct option.

E
Say if the answer is yes. Does that answer my query as to whether histidine was in the first place, not responsible in inhibiting the toxicity of the soil and helping the herb thrive? In the growing stage, histidine was present in certain concentrations. We are concerned with that stage of the herb. And this option neither confirms nor refutes the strength of this argument

Hence, this is not the correct option.
User avatar
Kavicogsci
Joined: 13 Jul 2024
Last visit: 09 Feb 2025
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 173
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This herb, herb X like a few other closely related plants thrives in soil with high conc of toxic metals

Key Q - why did they mention closely related here? Anyway keep reading

X produces Histidine (H)

In testube experiment H neutralises Toxic metals
So, H helps X to survive in soils with toxic metals [We have based result from Testube solutions btw]

Ok
(A) Whether the herb can thrive in soil that does not have high concentrations of the toxic metals
Maybe it can, why do we care?

(B) Whether others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities
No they don't. Maybe there is something else that is helping them and H seems to be a coincidence.

(C) Whether the herb's high level of histidine production is associated with an unusually low level of production of some other amino acid
Maybe it can, how does that help us?

(D) Whether growing the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over time, reduce their concentrations in the soil
Why do we need this? We are told H makes chemicals inert not reduce their conc. Even if they do, so what? How does it helps us?

(E) Whether the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity
Read slowly here
As plant approaches maturity - H declines - Yes - Cant survive in soil
As plant approaches maturity - H doesn't decline - Will still die because it is approaching maturity
So what are we trying to say LOL
harishbiyani8888
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the growth of this herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Hence, the herb's high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal-rich soils.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following?


(A) Whether the herb can thrive in soil that does not have high concentrations of the toxic metals

(B) Whether others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities

(C) Whether the herb's high level of histidine production is associated with an unusually low level of production of some other amino acid

(D) Whether growing the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over time, reduce their concentrations in the soil

(E) Whether the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity


Herb Growth

Step 1: Identify the Question

The words evaluating the argument in the question stem indicate that this is an Evaluate the Argument question.

Step 2: Deconstruct the Argument

Herb → grows w metals (toxic)

Study: Lots of hist, hist deac metals

Hist allows growth

Step 3: Pause and State the Goal

On Evaluate questions, the goal is to find a piece of information that would be important to know to determine whether the conclusion is valid. The correct answer could either strengthen or weaken the conclusion, depending upon the answer to the question. This argument takes findings from a study and concludes causation. Histidine renders the metal inert (inactive) so histidine allows for growth in soil with metal. What other information would make this assumed causation more or less likely?

Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right

(A) The argument states that the histidine allows the herb to grow in soil with high concentrations of metals. Whether or not the herb can also grow in soil without high concentrations of the metals does not affect this conclusion.

(B) CORRECT. The first sentence of the argument notes that several plants in the family can grow the soil with high concentrations of metals. If not all these plants have lots of histidine, then histidine is less likely to allow for such growth. On the other hand, if all the plants have histidine it is more likely to be the cause.

(B) The levels of other amino acids does not directly address whether histidine is what allows the plants to grow in the soil with high concentrations of metal.

(D) The argument is concerned with the growth of the plant, not how the concentration of metal may be changing.

(E) Changes in the levels of histidine in the plant over time do not directly relate to the conclusion. Even if levels of histidine decrease, there still could be enough histidine to deactivate the chemicals.
User avatar
Kavicogsci
Joined: 13 Jul 2024
Last visit: 09 Feb 2025
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 173
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
I felt for the no cause, no effect approach for causation question here because it appeared that's what Option E was aiming for. Why was that approach not correct in this one?

2. Also the conclusion clearly used the word 'it' referring to only this herb and not necessarily their whole related family - why can't we argue this herb could be an exceptional case in the family and we need not worry about the family?
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7356 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts