andrewjohn8
A certain website has rules regarding behavior in the comments section of that website. If a comment is flagged (judged to be inappropriate by one of the website's moderators) because it includes a personal attack on another person, the comment will be deleted and the commenter will be permanently banned from commenting on the website. If a comment is flagged merely because it includes inappropriate language, the comment will be deleted and the commenter will receive a warning. If a comment is flagged for any reason and the commenter has previously received a warning for a comment on this website, he or she will be permanently banned from commenting.
On the basis of these rules, a commenter, C, who had previously had one of his comments on the website flagged, was permanently banned after a second of C's comments on the website was flagged.
Based on the information provided, select for
Must be true the statement about C's comments that must be true, and select for
Must be false the statement about C's comments that must be false. Make only two selections, one in each column.
So, two cases:-
1) If a comment is flagged (judged to be inappropriate by one of the website's moderators) because it includes a personal attack on another person, the comment will be deleted and the commenter will be permanently banned from commenting on the website.
2) If a comment is flagged merely because it includes inappropriate language, the comment will be deleted and the commenter will receive a warning.
- If a comment is flagged for any reason and the commenter has previously received a warning for a comment on this website, he or she will be permanently banned from commenting.
Simplifying the above cases
1) First being personal attack - Immediate banning.
2) First being inappropriate language - warning. But a second warning would entail a ban irrespective of reason for being flagged.
Three ways for a person to get banned..
personal
language & then personal => L&P
language & then again language => L&L
C gets banned after second warning. So it is either L&P or L&L, and there is no other information to choose any one of these cases.
Now, let us look at the options
1.
At most one of the flagged comments included a personal attack. - If it is L&L, the answer is Yes. If it is L&P, then too the answer is YES.
So, this MUST be always true.2.
At least one of the flagged comments included a personal attack. - If it is L&L, the answer is NO. If it is L&P, then the answer is YES.
So, will not fall in any of the MUST categories.
3.
Neither of the flagged comments included a personal attack. - If it is L&L, the answer is YES. If it is L&P, then the answer is NO.
So, will not fall in any of the MUST categories.
4.
The first of the flagged comments included a personal attack. - Both L&L and L&P give a NO.
So, MUST not be true.
5.
The second of the flagged comments did not include a personal attack. - If it is L&L, the answer is YES. If it is L&P, then the answer is NO.
So, will not fall in any of the MUST categories.