Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:19 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
boomtangboy
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Last visit: 05 Jun 2021
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
2,768
 [236]
Given Kudos: 33
Status:May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Products:
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
222
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,402
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,402
Kudos: 778,406
 [53]
36
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
achatterjee14
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 11 Aug 2015
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
24
 [22]
Given Kudos: 4
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Posts: 4
Kudos: 24
 [22]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
35,356
 [13]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,356
 [13]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
boomtangboy
A merchant paid $300 for a shipment of x identical calculators. The merchant used 2 of the calculators as demonstrators and sold each of the others for $5 more than the average (arithmetic mean) cost of the x calculators. If the total revenue from the sale of the calculators was $120 more than the cost of the shipment, how many calculators were in the shipment?

A. 24
B. 25
C. 26
D. 28
E. 30

APPROACH #1: Testing the answer choices
STRATEGY: As with all GMAT Problem Solving questions, we should immediately ask ourselves, Can I use the answer choices to my advantage?
In this case, it's possible to test the answer choices, AND I can see how we might eliminate some answer choices first (more on this later).
Now we should give ourselves about 20 seconds to identify a faster approach.
Well, we can also solve the question algebraically, but that approach could take a while for this tricky question.
Since I feel like I can eliminate 2 or 3 answer choices first, I'm going to test the given values.


Given: The merchant sells EACH of the remaining calculators for $5 more than the average cost of the x calculators
So, for example, if the correct answer is C (x = 26) , then the average cost of each of the 26 calculators will be a complete mess, since 26 doesn't divide nicely into $300
We get: average cost per calculator = $300/26 = $11.538461...
This means the merchant would have to sell each of the remaining 24 calculators at a price of $16.538461..., which makes no sense.

Since answer choices C and D don't divide nicely into $300, I'm not going to test these values.
Aside: If the merchant bought 24 calculators (answer choice A), the average price per calculator would be $12.50, which isn't a bad to work with. So if answer choices B and E don't work out, I'll know the correct answer must be A.

Let's test answer choice B (x = 25)
If it costs $300 to purchase 25 calculators, then the average cost per calculator = $300/25 = $12
This means the merchant will sell each of the remaining 23 calculators at a price of $17
So, the total revenue = (23)($17)
I already know this answer is incorrect, because the question tells us that the total revenue was $120 more than the cost of the shipment. In other words, the total revenue must be $420, and since (23)($17) definitely does not equal $420, we can eliminate answer choice B.

Now let's test answer choice E (x = 30)
If it costs $300 to purchase 30 calculators, then the average cost per calculator = $300/30 = $10
This means the merchant will sell each of the remaining 28 calculators at a price of $15
So, the total revenue = (28)($15) = $420
Voila!!
The correct answer is E.



APPROACH #2: Algebra
The merchant originally buys x calculators for $300
So, the average purchase cost = 300/x dollars per calculator

Later, the calculators are sold for $5 more than the average purchase cost of 300/x dollars
So, the resell price is (300/x) + 5 dollars per calculator

How many were sold?
Well, the merchant began with x calculators, but used 2 as demonstrators, which means the merchant sold x - 2 calculators.

Finally, the merchant's profit was $120 (after the $300 investment). So, the total revenue was $420

We can now write an equation: [(300/x) + 5](x - 2) = 420

IMPORTANT: This is an awful equation to solve. At this point, it may be faster to try plugging in the answer choices.

Or we can solve the equation as follows:
Start with: [(300/x) + 5](x - 2) = 420
Expand: 300 - (600/x) + 5x - 10 = 420
Multiply both sides by x to get: 300x - 600 + 5x² - 10x = 420x
Simplify: 5x² - 130x - 600 = 0
Divide both sides by 5 to get: x² - 26x - 120 = 0
Factor: (x - 30)(x + 4) = 0
So, x = 30 or x = -4

Since x can't be negative, we know that x = 30

Answer: E
General Discussion
User avatar
jlgdr
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,311
Own Kudos:
2,863
 [4]
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 1,311
Kudos: 2,863
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
boomtangboy
A merchant paid $300 for a shipment of x identical calculators. The merchant used 2 of the calculators as demonstrators and sold each of the others for $5 more than the average (arithmetic mean) cost of the x calculators. If the total revenue from the sale of the calculators was $120 more than the cost of the shipment, how many calculators were in the shipment?

A. 24
B. 25
C. 26
D. 28
E. 30

Is this question correct? Shipping cost given but cost of each calculator missing.....

I'd go with backsolving on this one though I must admit that originally I tried to solve algebraically and was stuck with variables and quadratics

We will have (300/x + 5)(x-2) = 420

Then begin replacing, I started with 25 cause 26 would not yield an integer when divided by 300 but it didn't work, so I realized I needed a bigger number and the only factor of 30 that could work was E

So E

Hope it helps
Cheers!
J :)
avatar
PareshGmat
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Last visit: 10 Jul 2016
Posts: 1,534
Own Kudos:
8,102
 [5]
Given Kudos: 193
Status:The Best Or Nothing
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 1,534
Kudos: 8,102
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer = E

Total Calculators = x

Cost per calculator = \(\frac{300}{x}\)

Calculators sold = x-2

Selling price per calculator = \(\frac{300}{x} +5\)

Total amount received = \((\frac{300}{x} + 5) * (x-2) = 420\)

Solving,

\(x^2 - 26x - 120 = 0\)

x = 30
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,784
Own Kudos:
12,807
 [2]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,784
Kudos: 12,807
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

The information in the prompt include a variety of nice 'round' numbers, so it's likely that the number of calculators in the shipment is also a round number AND divides evenly into 300. Only two of the answers 'fit' that idea - 25 and 30, so let's TEST THE ANSWERS and see if either of those values fits all of the information given in the prompt.

IF.... X = 30 and there are 30 calculators in the shipment....

The merchant paid $300/30 = $10 per calculator
2 calculators were used for demonstrations, so 30 - 2 = 28 calculators were sold
Each of the 'sold' calculators brought in $10+$5 = $15
The total revenue was ($15)(28) = $420
The total profit was $420 - $300 = $120

This is an exact match for what we were told, so this MUST be the answer.

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
chrtpmdr
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Jul 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2022
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
GMAT 1: 730 Q46 V45
GPA: 3.9
GMAT 1: 730 Q46 V45
Posts: 202
Kudos: 533
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How to you avoid taking too long on factoring the quadratic equation?
I somehow always slightly get stressed when I don't have a first sight quadratic equation and I tend to overcomplicate, even though this one was quite solvable.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,784
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,784
Kudos: 12,807
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi chrtpmdr,

Most GMAT questions are written so that they can be solved in more than one way; in many cases, the 'math approach' actually takes longer than a more Tactical approach would take. You bring up a really important point about how factoring a quadratic equation could take more time than you want it to. In this question, you don't actually "need" to work in that way to get the correct answer - so you have to be careful about assuming that 'your way' to approach a question is the only way. You might inadvertently be making everything harder for yourself (and costing you time and points as a result).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 21,716
Own Kudos:
26,998
 [1]
Given Kudos: 300
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,716
Kudos: 26,998
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
boomtangboy
A merchant paid $300 for a shipment of x identical calculators. The merchant used 2 of the calculators as demonstrators and sold each of the others for $5 more than the average (arithmetic mean) cost of the x calculators. If the total revenue from the sale of the calculators was $120 more than the cost of the shipment, how many calculators were in the shipment?

A. 24
B. 25
C. 26
D. 28
E. 30

PS45502.01

Is this question correct? Shipping cost given but cost of each calculator missing.....

The average price of the cost of the x calculators is 300/x dollars.

(x - 2) calculators were sold for (300/x) + 5 dollars each, for a total revenue of:

(x - 2)[(300/x) + 5] = 300 + 5x - (600/x) - 10 = (300x - 600)/x + 5x - 10

Since the total revenue from the sale of the calculators was $120 more than the cost of the shipment:

(300x - 600)/x + 5x - 10 = 120 + 300

Multiplying by x, we have:

300x - 600 + 5x^2 - 10x = 120x + 300x

5x^2 - 130x - 600 = 0

x^2 - 26x - 120 = 0

(x - 30)(x + 4) = 0

x = 30 or x = -4

Since x can’t be negative, x = 30.

Answer: E
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [5]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chrtpmdr
How to you avoid taking too long on factoring the quadratic equation?
I somehow always slightly get stressed when I don't have a first sight quadratic equation and I tend to overcomplicate, even though this one was quite solvable.

Hello chrtpmdr,

In my opinion, you should never try to SOLVE an equation, whatever type it may be, on a GMAT Quant question.

In questions on equations, very often we solve to find the unknown/s. As such, the answer options given with the question will also represent the value of the unknowns we are trying to obtain. Therefore, solving a linear equation/quadratic in the step-by-step approach, by factorizing/taking things common/solving them as simultaneous equations smacks of a very ‘text-book’ kind of approach.

That’s not what GMAT is testing you on. Sure, GMAT expects you to be able to develop variables, construct equations and solve them. But it does not expect you to solve them in a certain set way. In fact, it probably wants you to try out innovative approaches by plugging in values – based on your judgement or from the options.
If you look at Cubic equations, there’s absolutely no way of knowing the first root until you plug in values like 0, 1 and -1. So, you need to understand that Math alone will not help you ace topics in GMAT Quant. You need to put on your logical reasoning hat as well.

But, unfortunately, that’s the bane of many test takers. They end up depending too much on Math to bail them out. They end up assuming that, solving an equation a particular way it was taught in school, is the best way of solving it. Really, there is no pride in solving equations the conventional way IMHO. I’d rather leverage the answer options and logic to figure out which options may fit in. I’d rather use the time to do this than breaking my head about the factors.

To answer your question about how to quickly factorise, you need to observe the constant and think of all the ways in which you can break it down into a product of 2 of its own factors.

For example, 120 = 20*6 / 30*4/12*10/15*8/24*5/60*2/120*1/40*3.

When you do this, it will become easy for you to pick the pair that will give you the middle term when added. I’m not saying that you will have to write out all the pairs all the time. If you inculcate this habit when you are starting off with your prep on Quadratics, by the time you factorise 10 to 15 quadratics, this would probably have become muscle memory for you. And that’s the idea of prepping for GMAT, building good muscle memory.

If you did not want to deal with this quadratic, you could have dealt with the more preliminary equation which has been equated to 420. Observe that, out of the options, only 28 and 30 are factors of 420. Remember that we are trying to find the number of calculators (which cannot be a fraction), so I’d naturally chose 30 since (30-2) should also be a factor of 420. Note that this happened more sub-consciously with me because of my muscle memory.

So, it’s really not about being strong with Math alone. If you think of it that way, I’d not be surprised if you are stressed in such situations. From now on, try to incorporate a few of these things in your Quant prep and you will see yourself saving on time on effort.

Hope that helps!
User avatar
wishmasterdj
Joined: 04 May 2016
Last visit: 25 Oct 2021
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Schools: ISB '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.2
Schools: ISB '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 91
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While the question is straight forward, I was thinking of an alternate approach for this. Please advise on what I am doing wrong (since I dont get 30 as the answer):

delta between SP and CP = 5
Number of units sold = x-2
Profit = 120

5 * (x-2) = 120

This gives us 26, which is wrong. But I was wondering what my mistake is in this approach..
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,784
Own Kudos:
12,807
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,784
Kudos: 12,807
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi wishmasterdj,

Your approach ignores the fact that the total revenue has to be $120 more than the cost of the SHIPMENT (re: $300) - and since 2 of the calculators were NOT sold, that impacts what the SP of each unit has to be. This means that it's not enough to solve for total profit (and your equation is focused on the $120 profit); you have to solve for a total of $420 of revenue.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
crampipan
Joined: 02 Aug 2020
Last visit: 31 Aug 2021
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 10
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(t + 300/x) * (x-2) - 300 = 120
5x + 300x/x - 600/x = 430
5x - 600/x = 130
5x^2 + 600 = 130x
5x^2 - 130x = 600
x^2 - 26x = 120
x^2 - 26x + 169 = 289 (add 169 to both sides)
(x-13)^2 = 289
(x - 13) = sqrt(289)
(x - 13) = 17
x = 30
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
boomtangboy
A merchant paid $300 for a shipment of x identical calculators. The merchant used 2 of the calculators as demonstrators and sold each of the others for $5 more than the average (arithmetic mean) cost of the x calculators. If the total revenue from the sale of the calculators was $120 more than the cost of the shipment, how many calculators were in the shipment?

A. 24
B. 25
C. 26
D. 28
E. 30

PS45502.01

Is this question correct? Shipping cost given but cost of each calculator missing.....



cost of each calculator is 300/x
The average price of each calculator is 300x+5;
Total calculators sold is x−2;
The total =>300+120=420;

(x−2)∗(300/x+5)=420.
by simple brute force method we get to the answer
Hence IMO E
User avatar
MBAHOUSE
User avatar
MBA House Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 May 2022
Last visit: 23 Apr 2024
Posts: 337
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 337
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 A merchant paid $300 for a shipment of x identical calculators. The merchant used two of the calculators as demonstrators and sold each of the others for $5 more than the average (arithmetic mean) cost of the x calculators. If the total revenue from the sale of the calculators was $120 more than the cost of the shipment, how many calculators were in the shipment?
 
Attachments

IMG_3027.jpeg
IMG_3027.jpeg [ 608.07 KiB | Viewed 15752 times ]

User avatar
kokus
Joined: 05 Aug 2019
Last visit: 09 Aug 2024
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 378
Posts: 36
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The cost of the calculators is $300 and they are sold for $420 (since the profit is $120 more than the cost). Therefore, the number of sold units must be divisible by the revenue ($420) and the cost ($300). Only E fits.­
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
428
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 428
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­p: cost price of a calculator

x * p = 300
(x-2) * (p+5) = 300 + 120 = 420

From the answer choices, x is among 24, 25, 26, 28, 30

300 is divisible by 25 and 30 only
300 = 25 * 12 = 30 * 10

27 * 17 ends with digit 9
28 * 15 = 420

=> x = 30
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,591
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,591
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105398 posts
Tuck School Moderator
805 posts