pk6969
BukrsGmat
A recent poll of elected officials suggests that candidates, when in the midst of a tough campaign, often make statements about an opponent that they may not think
is true.
(A) is
(B) are
(C) to be
(D) of as
(E) it is
Guys need help to analyze the last clause... that they may not think is true. what is subject that or they? why there are two verbs.
I picked up C(not a verb) ..but its wrong...
please post your comments.
People who only want to post the ans option rather than full dissection please refrain . B'coz all of us know the ans no need to repeat it.
hello! Is this question only using idioms as a point of differentiation? I couldn't find any reason to eliminate choice C and D. Please help
AndrewN GMATNinja DmitryFarberYou can check out our take on choice (C) in
this post.
As for choice (D), let's start with a couple examples that illustrate how a "think of as" construction might be used:
- "Tim's children think of his books as an excellent source of fuel for the fireplace." - One thing (Tim's books) is thought of as another thing (an excellent source of fuel).
- "Tim writes books that his children think of as an excellent source of fuel for the fireplace." - This is basically the same as the last sentence, but rearranged to look more like choice (D). The use of "think of as" works because we still have one thing that is thought of as another thing.
But now check out this super-simplified version of choice (D):
"Candidates make statements that they think of as true."
Notice that we no longer have one
thing that is thought of as another
thing. Instead, we have one thing that is thought of as true (a modifier).
I don't think that automatically makes it wrong, but now let's rearrange this to mirror the first example above ("Tim's children think of his books as..."):
"Candidates think of their statements as true."
Why would we ever write this instead of simply writing "Candidates think their statements are true"? There's no need to use the "think of... as" construction because we aren't comparing the statements to another
thing. At the very least, this version leaves me wondering, "Well, why did the author write 'think of as true' instead of just 'think are true'? Is 'thinking of things as true' different than 'thinking things are true'? I'm confused."
So yes, there is an idiomatic difference between (B) and (D) (one that isn't worth worrying too much about, by the way). But ultimately the idiom is better in (B) because it conveys the intended meaning in a clearer, simpler way. That makes (B) the better choice.
I hope that helps!