It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 07:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1881

Kudos [?]: 1399 [1], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 01:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (01:07) correct 59% (01:13) wrong based on 637 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1990.

(A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

(B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

(C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

(D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 time more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

(E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1399 [1], given: 1

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 19 [1], given: 0

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 14:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
Quote:
A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

My answer is C. Could some one provide insight why C is wrong.
A - average of 419 times - Eliminate
B - a ratio that compares to 42 times - Felt akward - since both are ratios. Compared with is better - Eliminate
C - as compared to looks correct, the ratio correctly modifies 42 times their pay.
D and E - Eliminate. Sentence should start with that.
_________________

Many people dream, but some wake up and work towards it.

Kudos [?]: 19 [1], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1881

Kudos [?]: 1399 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 18:26
So tricky Gmatprep! that is why I am wrong also! The sentence is contructed in the simple way, but not easy to crack it!

B is NOT OA! :-D

Can anybody help me what "a ratio" in B refer to? to "workers" the word immediately next to? so confusing! thanks!
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings


Last edited by sondenso on 15 May 2008, 18:36, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 1399 [0], given: 1

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 18:35
I guess its C then, thats the only other one that even remotely makes sense.

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 547

Kudos [?]: 538 [0], given: 2

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 May 2008, 12:09
sondenso wrote:
Year, OA is C, and with a BIG question WHY? in my head :-D


B - a ratio that compares to 42 times (of What?)
C avoids that confusion.
However I am not comfortable with CEO's
Is it CEOs ? If yes then then we have 'their' problem in C.
If No, then the sentence does not make sense to me.
....., on average, CEO’s now earn
....., on average, CEOs now earn
I see some difference here..but cannot expln what it is..can anyone help ..Thanks :-D

Kudos [?]: 538 [0], given: 2

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 25

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2008, 21:27
farend wrote:
"their" is ambiguous(2 references) in C


i agree with this too.
anyway, another killer question...
:oops:

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 25

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 398

Kudos [?]: 292 [2], given: 0

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2008, 02:10
2
This post received
KUDOS
saravalli wrote:
sondenso wrote:
Year, OA is C, and with a BIG question WHY? in my head :-D


B - a ratio that compares to 42 times (of What?)
C avoids that confusion.
However I am not comfortable with CEO's
Is it CEOs ? If yes then then we have 'their' problem in C.
If No, then the sentence does not make sense to me.
....., on average, CEO’s now earn
....., on average, CEOs now earn
I see some difference here..but cannot expln what it is..can anyone help ..Thanks :-D



We are comparing between ratio nowadays and ratio in 1980. Ok, INDICATES need THAT followed. => Rule out D, E.

A:ratio of 42 times in 1980. , B: 42 times ("of" what) in 1980. ==> Eliminate A, B.
C:AS compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio in 1980.
C containS AS. C has only problem with THEIR but can be ACCEPTABLE and C is also the best choice among 5 choices.

Kudos [?]: 292 [2], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2008, 11:22
anirudhoswal wrote:
sondenso wrote:
31. A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times - compared to? error of comparison
B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times - Seems OK
C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio - "their" in 42 times their has no clear referrent
D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio - "their" in 42 times their has no clear referrent
E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times - no need for continuous present tense


IMO: B



Still in favor of B.
Am I wrong if I say

A recent review of pay scales indicates that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times the ratio in 1980.
isn't "the ratio" implied?? Is there anything else that can be compared? If there is no ambiguity about it then B should be OK.

But now I am less sure than before :(

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 275

Kudos [?]: 53 [3], given: 0

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2008, 12:14
3
This post received
KUDOS
sondenso wrote:
31. A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times



Very weird question, Sondenso. I believe that the apostrophe (') is wrong in all the choices. All choices should have CEOs not CEO's. But, if we neglect this error then,

D and E are out because they don't use "that".

A is out because it uses "more".

B is wrong because "a ratio" modifies workers.

So, only C is left.

what is source?

Last edited by sanjay_gmat on 22 May 2008, 07:42, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 53 [3], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 0

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2008, 15:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1990.

(A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

(B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times.

(C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

(D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 time more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

(E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

Last edited by hazelnut on 01 Sep 2017, 00:39, edited 4 times in total.
Reformatted the question.

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2008, 14:52
Mikus wrote:
I'd go with (B).

In this context, the review indicates THAT X, so I'd eliminate (D) and (E) immediately.

I'd eliminate (A) because the original sentence is comparing the CEO's pay to blue collar workers themselves, which is not apples to apples.

(B) and (C) are both awfully constructed sentences-- but "their" is ambiguous in (C), so I'd be left with a very unfortunate-looking (B).


What's the OA?


same reason D & E out.

A is out because A says now earn an average of 419 times more pay. Does not make any sense to me.

C uses ambiguous their and is way awkward.

B is clear and concise

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 25

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2008, 11:28
I picked C.
I don't think B corrected expressed what it is comparing. C, although long, but not necessarily wordy, made the correct comparison.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 25

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 27 [3], given: 0

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2008, 05:38
3
This post received
KUDOS
its B
as i know this:
"X indicates that Y is verb/participle Z" is the correct idiom.
Also "indicate" must be followed by "that"

Kudos [?]: 27 [3], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2008, 02:31
hbs2012 wrote:
Set 1 Question 7

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1990.

b. that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times.
c. that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
d. CEo's who now earn on average 419 time more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
e. CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times


B also

"indicate" + that, thus, cross out D and E.

"their" in C is ambiguous, it refers to what?

A is akward.

Plz, post the OA as soon as possible

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2008, 02:44
Whew......... Im confused b/w B and C.Though B seems concise but somehow in B, a ratio that compares to 42 times looks awkward.At the same time, in C "their" is ambigious
hbs2012 wrote:
Set 1 Question 7

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1990.

b. that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times.
c. that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
d. CEo's who now earn on average 419 time more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
e. CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 323

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 7

GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2009, 18:07
C is definitely not correct. One ratio is recent and one is in 1990. The last bit, "the ratio in 1990", applies only to the compared ratio, not the whole thing.

Example:
This fact, compared to this fact, at this date <--- correct, both facts relate to that some date
This recent fact, compared to this fact, at this date <--- incorrect

B is better because the sentence now reads

Fact at one date, compared to fact at an other date.

Hope that helps.

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 7

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 237

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2009, 17:28
d& e are clearly out.
a is out because x times more pay.
b & c are somewhat tricky. I went with c because I did not like "compares to" in b.
May be b is the most appropriate.
BTW I was also confused with the use of apostrophe s (CEO's as opposed to CEOs).
hbs2012 wrote:
Set 1 Question 7

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1990.

b. that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times.
c. that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
d. CEo's who now earn on average 419 time more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
e. CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

_________________

-----------------------
tusharvk

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 117

Kudos [?]: 161 [1], given: 2

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2009, 23:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
_________________

==============================================
Do not answer without sharing the reasoning behind ur choice
-----------------------------------------------------------
Working on my weakness : GMAT Verbal
------------------------------------------------------------
Ask:
Why, What, How, When, Where, Who
==============================================

Kudos [?]: 161 [1], given: 2

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 808

Kudos [?]: 373 [2], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2009, 00:59
2
This post received
KUDOS
I was not satisfied with the B - "the ratio that compares to 42 times in 1980" - so I searched and found this link:

This is a gem of questions. Please see the link:

http://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... cates.html
Lot of concepts discussed:

- usage of apostrophe - CEO's
- pronoun usage. (when not to emphasize on the ambiguity of pronoun)
- Other interesting thing to note that in GMAT Land, as per the guru, difference between "compare to" and "compare with" is not tested and has no significant difference.
**This guru is shaking the concepts of Manhattan GMAT SC concepts*** :)

Must read :)
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 373 [2], given: 106

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 131

Kudos [?]: 43 [1], given: 50

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2009, 07:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
IN C as compared to to refers to blue-collar workers but not to The Ratio(in the Question the ratio should be compared. so we can easily eliminate C

please correct if im wrong.

Kudos [?]: 43 [1], given: 50

Re: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2009, 07:56

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 68 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.