AlN
GMATNinja
mdacosta
I agree w/ the 'found that' idiom, but is it ok to leave out THAT after the 'and'?
The study found that:
1) that Amox is as effective as the more expensive stuff
2) that it causes fewer side effects
Here is what the sentence looks like with the correct answer choice (D):
"A recent study has found that amoxicillin, long a standard treatment for ear infections, is about as effective as newer, more expensive antibiotics and causes fewer side effects."
If we add a "that" in the middle of "and causes", we will have a parallelism issue... "A recent study has found that amoxicillin is effective and that causes fewer side effects." The noun "amoxicillin" appears after "that", so if you add another "that", you'd have to add another noun, i.e. "A recent study has found that amoxicillin is effective and that patients prefer amoxicillin to other antibiotics."
As is, the sentence correctly creates a list of the two parallel verbs "is" and "causes": "... that amoxicillin
is... and
causes..."
GMATNinja is
and that an independent clause? If so shouldnt it be connected by FANBOYS
I'm not sure that I understand your question, but I'll give it a shot...
You can certainly have a parallel list of "that" clauses, i.e., "A study has found 1) that amoxicillin is effective and 2) that penicillin is ineffective."
Both 1) and 2) are noun clauses which cannot stand by themselves ("
that penicillin is ineffective" would not be a complete thought).
NandishSS
Quote:
A recent study has found amoxicillin, long a standard treatment for ear infections, as being about as effective as newer, more expensive antibiotics and causing fewer side effects.
(B) amoxicillin, long a standard treatment for ear infections, to be about as effective compared to newer, more expensive antibiotics and with
(C) amoxicillin, long a standard treatment for ear infections, to be about as effective as newer, more expensive antibiotics and that it causes
HI
GMATNinja,
mikemcgarry,
DmitryFarber,
MagooshExpert (Carolyn),
ccooley,
GMATGuruNY,
EMPOWERgmatVerbal,
EducationAisleCan we eliminate, because B & C lack verb?
Also in C to be is not parallel to that? Is my understanding correct?
B & C both have a main verb: "A recent study
has found..." However, as pointed out in
this post, we need a "that" after "has found". The study did not FIND amoxicillin (hiding under a rock?). Rather, the study found out something ABOUT amoxicillin. What did the study find out? "THAT amoxicillin is about as effective...{etc.}"
We also want "as effective as", not "as effective compared to", so there's another issue with (B).
Quote:
Also in C to be is not parallel to that? Is my understanding correct?
Yes, you are right about the parallelism issue in (C)!