Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Want to score 90 percentile or higher on GMAT CR? Attend this free webinar to learn how to pre-think assumptions and solve the most challenging questions in less than 2 minutes.

Want to solve 700+ level Algebra questions within 2 minutes? Attend this free webinar to learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Values questions in GMAT

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Nov 2015, 00:13

Hi mvictor,

There's a difference between alphabetical order and CONSECUTIVE alphabetical order (in the same way that there's a difference between putting integers in numerical order and dealing with consecutive integers).

As an example, when dealing with the letters A, B, C and D there are 6 different pairs of letters that you could put in alphabetical order:

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jun 2016, 06:06

2

sarb wrote:

A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical experiment with a code consisting of either a single letter or a pair of distinct letters written in alphabetical order. What is the least number of letters that can be used if there are 12 participants, and each participant is to receive a different code?

A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7 E. 8

Let's use the answer choices to help us solve this problem. We are looking for the minimum number of letters that can be used. The smallest number from the answer choices is 4, so let’s ask ourselves this question: Can we use only 4 letters to represent the 12 participants? Assume that the 4 letters are A, B, C and D (keep in mind that for each participant we can use either one letter OR two letters to represent him or her; however if we use two letters, they must be in alphabetical order):

1) A 2) B 3) C 4) D 5) AB 6) AC 7) AD 8) BC 9) BD 10) CD

Under this scheme, we can represent only 10 of the 12 participants. So let's add in one more letter, say E, and see if having an additional letter allows us to have a unique identifier for each of the 12 participants:

1) A 2) B 3) C 4) D 5) AB 6) AC 7) AD 8) BC 9) BD 10) CD 11) E 12) AE

As you can see, once we’ve added in the letter E we can represent all 12 participants. Since we’ve used A, B, C, D and E, the minimum number of letters that can be used is 5.

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2016, 08:45

Hi,

Could someone please explain how we went from n!/2!(n-2)! -> n(n-1)/2 ?

In addition to the above query, I am still unclear as to why we use combination formula to solve this particular question when order clearly matters? I read Bunuels response as to why, but I am still unclear. I must have spent 5 days reading the explanation.

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2016, 10:36

1

g3lo18 wrote:

In addition to the above query, I am still unclear as to why we use combination formula to solve this particular question when order clearly matters? I read Bunuels response as to why, but I am still unclear. I must have spent 5 days reading the explanation.

Posted from my mobile device

(replying here instead of in chat as there's an MBA session going on).

The only thing that matters is the number of distinct pairs.

Stating that the order must be alphabetical states that only 1 of all potential pairs is valid. This is equivalent to the combination formula as shown below.

For example, with \(\{A,B,C,D\}\), the list of permutations of size 2 is \(4_P 2 = 12\)

AB, BA = 2! ways to arrange 2 elements AC, CA AD, DA BC, CB BD, DB CD, DC

Saying that the order of the selection does not matter is equivalent to saying that every permutation is the same which is equivalent to saying that only one of each permutation is valid.

Permutations = \(\frac{n!}{(n-k)!}\) Combinations = \(\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}\) Number of ways of arranging each new selection of elements = \(k!\) Where 1 out of every new selection is valid = \(\frac{1}{k!}\) Permutations where only 1 permutation is valid = \(\frac{n!}{(n-k)!} \times \frac{1}{k!} =\) Combinations

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2016, 10:53

Thank you for that.

I guess my confusion stems from watching the GMATPrepNow videos. Brent explains that if the order does not matter, we use nCr formula. However, in this case it does matter (alphabetical). I guess there may be an error in his videos?

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2016, 11:22

g3lo18 wrote:

Thank you for that.

I guess my confusion stems from watching the GMATPrepNow videos. Brent explains that if the order does not matter, we use nCr formula. However, in this case it does matter (alphabetical). I guess there may be an error in his videos?

Sorry, this is relatively hard to explain and I don't feel I'm making a good job of explaining it.

In this question, the order does not matter.

The problem lies with the interpretation of the phrase "the order matters". Specifically it means: when selecting a set of elements for the output, every permutation of that set is valid. This means that \(\{A,B,D\}\) and \(\{D,A,B\}\) are both distinct and valid elements in the solution set.

A combination on the other hand specifies that \(\{A,B,D\}\) and \(\{D,A,B\}\) are equivalent (which can also be described by saying that the order does not matter). This means that for the set of possible solutions containing three elements, only one of which is valid.

In this question, every pair of letters maps to a single solution: out of \(\{\{A,B\},\{B,A\}\}\), only \(\{A,B\}\) is valid. We are performing the operation of moving from a set of elements to a single element. Therefore we use combinations.

EDIT (may be more clear): In this question, we are first taking a collection of letters and determining how many pairs of distinct letters we can make (permutations). For every pair of distinct letters, we are then mapping from that collection to a single element. This map from a collection to a single element is a combination (all elements in the set of \(\{\{A,B\},\{B,A\}\}\) are not a valid solutions, but each is a map to the single valid solution in the set: \(\{A,B\})\).

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

10 May 2017, 06:33

Bunuel wrote:

sarb wrote:

A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical experiment with a code consisting of either a single letter or a pair of distinct letters written in alphabetical order. What is the least number of letters that can be used if there are 12 participants, and each participant is to receive a different code?

A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7 E. 8

Say there are minimum of \(n\) letters needed, then;

The # of single letter codes possible would be \(n\) itself; The # of pair of distinct letters codes possible would be \(C^2_n\) (in alphabetical order);

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

10 May 2017, 06:37

brandon7 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

sarb wrote:

A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical experiment with a code consisting of either a single letter or a pair of distinct letters written in alphabetical order. What is the least number of letters that can be used if there are 12 participants, and each participant is to receive a different code?

A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7 E. 8

Say there are minimum of \(n\) letters needed, then;

The # of single letter codes possible would be \(n\) itself; The # of pair of distinct letters codes possible would be \(C^2_n\) (in alphabetical order);

Can you please share the number of codes possible in alphabets. I am still confused with the combinations between 5 alphabets and assigning 12 unique codes with two distinct letters. Thanks.
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Can you please share the number of codes possible in alphabets. I am still confused with the combinations between 5 alphabets and assigning 12 unique codes with two distinct letters. Thanks.

The number of codes consisting of either a single letter or a pair of distinct letters from 26-letter alphabet is \(26+C^2_{26}\).
_________________

Affiliations: AB, cum laude, Harvard University (Class of '02)

Joined: 10 Jul 2015

Posts: 717

Location: United States (CA)

Age: 40

GMAT 1:770 Q47 V48

GMAT 2:730 Q44 V47

GMAT 3:750 Q50 V42

GRE 1: Q168 V169

WE: Education (Education)

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 29 Nov 2017, 19:47

Top Contributor

Since the question asks for the minimum number of letters, it makes sense to start with the least answer (choice A) and work your way down.

A) 4 choose 1 is 4, and 4 choose 2 is 6. Unfortunately this only adds up to 10, and 10 < 12. B) 5 choose 1 is 5 and 5 choose 2 is 10. This adds up to 15, and 15 > 12. We have a winner!

-Brian

Originally posted by mcelroytutoring on 17 Oct 2017, 12:09.
Last edited by mcelroytutoring on 29 Nov 2017, 19:47, edited 1 time in total.

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Dec 2017, 09:05

1

Top Contributor

1

sarb wrote:

A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical experiment with a code consisting of either a single letter or a pair of distinct letters written in alphabetical order. What is the least number of letters that can be used if there are 12 participants, and each participant is to receive a different code?

A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7 E. 8

One approach is to add a BLANK to the letters in order to account for the possibility of using just one letter for a code.

ASIDE: Notice that, if we select 2 characters, there's only 1 possible code that can be created. The reason for this is that the 2 characters must be in ALPHABETICAL order. Or, in the case that a letter and a blank are selected, there's only one possible code as well.

Now we'll test the answer choices.

Answer choice A (4 letters) Let the letters be A, B, C, D We'll add a "-" to represent a BLANK. So, we must choose 2 characters from {A, B, C, D, -} In how many ways can we select 2 characters? We can use combinations to answer this. There are 5 characters, and we must select 2. This can be accomplished in 5C2 ways (= 10 ways). So, there are only 10 possible codes if we use 4 letters. We want at least 12 codes.

[i]ASIDE: If anyone is interested, we have a free video on calculating combinations (like 5C2) in your head below.

Answer choice B (5 letters) Let the letters be A, B, C, D, E Once again, we'll add a "-" to represent a BLANK. So, we must choose 2 characters from {A, B, C, D, E, -} There are 6 characters, and we must select 2. This can be accomplished in 6C2 ways (= 15 ways...PERFECT).

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Dec 2017, 09:08

1

Top Contributor

sarb wrote:

A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical experiment with a code consisting of either a single letter or a pair of distinct letters written in alphabetical order. What is the least number of letters that can be used if there are 12 participants, and each participant is to receive a different code?

A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7 E. 8

We can also TEST each answer choice by LISTING all possible codes.

Answer choice A (4 letters) Let the letters be A, B, C, D The possible codes are: A B C D AB AC AD BC BD CD TOTAL = 10 (not enough. We need at least 12 codes)

Answer choice B (5 letters) Let the letters be A, B, C, D, E The possible codes are: A B C D E AB AC AD AE BC BD BE CD CE DC TOTAL = 15

Perfect, 5 letters will give us the 12 codes we need.

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2017, 15:26

Bunuel wrote:

kevn1115 wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

I'm confused on when you show that n! = (n-2)!*(n-1)*n...why is n! only limited to those 3 factors? I guess the question is why do you start at (n-2)!?

Thanks.!

\(C^2_n=\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!}\). Now, notice that \(n!=(n-2)!*(n-1)*n\), hence \(C^2_n=\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!}=\frac{(n-2)!*(n-1)*n}{2!(n-2)!}=\frac{(n-1)n}{2}\).

Hope it's clear.

n! is the product of positive integers from 1 to n, inclusive: n! = 1*2*...*(n-4)*(n-3)(n-2)(n-1)n. To simplify \(\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!}\) I wrote n! as (n-2)!*(n-1)*n this enables us to reduce by (n-2)! to get \(\frac{(n-1)n}{2}\).

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel -Thank you ! Now when I`ve reviewed the whole thread and still trying to understand some moments - why do you write it in this order 1*2*...*(n-4)*(n-3)(n-2)(n-1)n and not vice versa like this 1*2*...n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)(n-4) etc ...also why you say" notice that n!=(n-2)(n-1)n" yes it as n! is in numerator as per formula and unlike formula, you simplify n! = n!/2!(n-2)! into != (n-2)(n-1)n" / 2!(n-2)! first cant not "notice" the important detail you are trying to imply by pointing at this ---> n!=(n-2)(n-1)n - can I be helped with further explanation to understand this "notice" because in other combination formulas we didn't apply such simplification

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2017, 20:36

1

dave13 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

kevn1115 wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

I'm confused on when you show that n! = (n-2)!*(n-1)*n...why is n! only limited to those 3 factors? I guess the question is why do you start at (n-2)!?

Thanks.!

\(C^2_n=\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!}\). Now, notice that \(n!=(n-2)!*(n-1)*n\), hence \(C^2_n=\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!}=\frac{(n-2)!*(n-1)*n}{2!(n-2)!}=\frac{(n-1)n}{2}\).

Hope it's clear.

n! is the product of positive integers from 1 to n, inclusive: n! = 1*2*...*(n-4)*(n-3)(n-2)(n-1)n. To simplify \(\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!}\) I wrote n! as (n-2)!*(n-1)*n this enables us to reduce by (n-2)! to get \(\frac{(n-1)n}{2}\).

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel -Thank you ! Now when I`ve reviewed the whole thread and still trying to understand some moments - why do you write it in this order 1*2*...*(n-4)*(n-3)(n-2)(n-1)n and not vice versa like this 1*2*...n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)(n-4) etc ...also why you say" notice that n!=(n-2)(n-1)n" yes it as n! is in numerator as per formula and unlike formula, you simplify n! = n!/2!(n-2)! into != (n-2)(n-1)n" / 2!(n-2)! first cant not "notice" the important detail you are trying to imply by pointing at this ---> n!=(n-2)(n-1)n - can I be helped with further explanation to understand this "notice" because in other combination formulas we didn't apply such simplification

1. n! is the product of integers from 1 to n, inclusive. So, n! = 1*2*...*(n-4)(n-3)(n-2)(n-1)n (1 is the smallest and n is the largest). Yes, you can write this in any order but it does not change anything.

2. n! = (n-2)!*(n-1)*n because (n-2)! = 1*2*...*(n-4)(n-3)(n-2), so (n-2)!*(n-1)*n = [1*2*...*(n-4)(n-3)(n-2)](n-1)n = n!

3. We can write \(C^2_n=\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!}=\frac{(n-2)!*(n-1)*n}{2!(n-2)!}=\frac{(n-1)n}{2}\) whenever it's necessary.

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jan 2018, 08:12

sarb wrote:

A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical experiment with a code consisting of either a single letter or a pair of distinct letters written in alphabetical order. What is the least number of letters that can be used if there are 12 participants, and each participant is to receive a different code?

A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7 E. 8

We can use just logic to solve this question.

Here we are given that all letters and we need to get the least number of letters for 12 participants and all the letter should in alphabetical order.

Let's choose 4 letters since this is the least number. A B C D Then we can choose two letters again , AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, BD - total 6 ways. ( Note here we can't BA since we need to follow alphabetical order ) Total 4 + 6 = 10 and this suits only for 10 participants.

Let's choose 5 letters. A B C D E - 5 ways AB AC AD AE BC BD BE CD CE DE - 10 ways . We got 15 ways and 15 different codes are sufficient to give the code for 12 participants.

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Oct 2018, 03:31

The question says that the letters have to be in alphabetical order so in this case can we keep AC too. Since while writing AC we are missing B and not writing in alphabetical order

Re: A researcher plans to identify each participant in a certain medical
[#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Oct 2018, 11:57

Hi hassu13,

There's a difference between alphabetical order and CONSECUTIVE alphabetical order (in the same way that there's a difference between putting integers in numerical order and dealing with consecutive integers).

As an example, when dealing with the letters A, B, C and D there are 6 different pairs of letters that you could put in alphabetical order: