Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:38 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,173
 [82]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
78
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
nick1816
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,849
Own Kudos:
8,237
 [14]
Given Kudos: 707
Location: India
Posts: 1,849
Kudos: 8,237
 [14]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
metalhead2593
Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Last visit: 18 Dec 2020
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
31
 [4]
Given Kudos: 322
Posts: 31
Kudos: 31
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Foreheadson
Joined: 22 Jun 2020
Last visit: 24 Sep 2022
Posts: 152
Own Kudos:
91
 [4]
Given Kudos: 120
Location: Georgia
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V38
GPA: 3.71
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V38
Posts: 152
Kudos: 91
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
absolutely unsolvable under 2 mins for me 😒

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Thekingmaker
Joined: 28 Nov 2020
Last visit: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 96
Posts: 112
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i never gott to the bottom of the question i had made a combimation and it had by chance culminated hence i answered it as it was a highly difficult 42 and more open was never in the realm of correct hence i nose dived into the second best option hence imo D this tokk around 4 min
User avatar
ThatDudeKnows
Joined: 11 May 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,070
Own Kudos:
977
 [2]
Given Kudos: 79
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,070
Kudos: 977
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A software company named Hardsoft has three divisions, each staffed by at least 10 people. The ratio of men to women is 7:5 in Finance and Administration, 3:4 in Marketing and Sales and 8:7 in Research and Development. If there are 100 men working in Hardsoft and every Hardsoft employee works for one of the three divisions, then the difference between the maximum and minimum possible number of women working in Hardsoft is

(A) 39
(B) 40
(C) 41
(D) 42
(E) more than 42


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions

Longer than two minutes, but if I get a question like this on an actual exam, I'm pretty sure I'll be at 50 or 51 Quant!

Maximizing the number of women looks like it'll be driven primarily by having as many people as possible in Marketing/Sales. The number of men in Marketing/Sales will be a multiple of 3 and it can't be larger than 85, since we still need to place at least 7 men in Finance/Administration and 8 men in Research/Development.
Could it be 84? Nope; there would be no way to add some multiple of 7 and some multiple of 8 and arrive at 100.
Could it be 81? Nope.
Could it be 78? Yep, we could add 7+7+8 and get to 100.
In this configuration, we have 26 "sets" of Marketing/Sales, 2 "sets" of Finance/Administration, and 1 "set" of Research/Development.
That's 26(4)+2(5)+1(7) = 121 women

Minimizing the number of women is the opposite. We want Marketing/Sales to be as small as possible and Finance/Administration to be as large as possible. The number of men in Finance/Administration will be a multiple of 7 and it can't be larger than 86, since we still need to place at least 8 men in Finance/Administration and 6 men in Marketing/Sales.
Could it be 84? Nope; there would be no way to add some multiple of 8 and some multiple of 3 (that is at least 6) and arrive at 100.
Could it be 77? Nope.
Could it be 70? Yep, we could add 8+8+8+3+3 and get to 100.
In this configuration, we have 2 "sets" of Marketing/Sales, 10 "sets" of Finance/Administration, and 3 "sets" of Research/Development.
That's 2(4)+10(5)+3(7) = 79 women

121-79 = 42

Answer choice D.
User avatar
TradingJackets
Joined: 01 Feb 2024
Last visit: 22 Mar 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ThatDudeKnows

Bunuel
A software company named Hardsoft has three divisions, each staffed by at least 10 people. The ratio of men to women is 7:5 in Finance and Administration, 3:4 in Marketing and Sales and 8:7 in Research and Development. If there are 100 men working in Hardsoft and every Hardsoft employee works for one of the three divisions, then the difference between the maximum and minimum possible number of women working in Hardsoft is

(A) 39
(B) 40
(C) 41
(D) 42
(E) more than 42


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions

Longer than two minutes, but if I get a question like this on an actual exam, I'm pretty sure I'll be at 50 or 51 Quant!

Maximizing the number of women looks like it'll be driven primarily by having as many people as possible in Marketing/Sales. The number of men in Marketing/Sales will be a multiple of 3 and it can't be larger than 85, since we still need to place at least 7 men in Finance/Administration and 8 men in Research/Development.
Could it be 84? Nope; there would be no way to add some multiple of 7 and some multiple of 8 and arrive at 100.
Could it be 81? Nope.
Could it be 78? Yep, we could add 7+7+8 and get to 100.
In this configuration, we have 26 "sets" of Marketing/Sales, 2 "sets" of Finance/Administration, and 1 "set" of Research/Development.
That's 26(4)+2(5)+1(7) = 121 women

Minimizing the number of women is the opposite. We want Marketing/Sales to be as small as possible and Finance/Administration to be as large as possible. The number of men in Finance/Administration will be a multiple of 7 and it can't be larger than 86, since we still need to place at least 8 men in Finance/Administration and 6 men in Marketing/Sales.
Could it be 84? Nope; there would be no way to add some multiple of 8 and some multiple of 3 (that is at least 6) and arrive at 100.
Could it be 77? Nope.
Could it be 70? Yep, we could add 8+8+8+3+3 and get to 100.
In this configuration, we have 2 "sets" of Marketing/Sales, 10 "sets" of Finance/Administration, and 3 "sets" of Research/Development.
That's 2(4)+10(5)+3(7) = 79 women

121-79 = 42

Answer choice D.
­Could you please explain why "Maximizing the number of women looks like it'll be driven primarily by having as many people as possible in Marketing/Sales.", similarily why "Minimizing the number of women is the opposite. We want Marketing/Sales to be as small as possible and Finance/Administration to be as large as possible."Many thanks. 
User avatar
cskarlapudi
Joined: 20 Apr 2024
Last visit: 18 Oct 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Notice the difference between the numbers in the ratios:

In F&A it is 2 in favour of men out of a total of 12; compare that with the other ratio 8:7 which is just 1 in favour of men out of a total of 15. Compare 2/12 with 1/15. You know why to maximize men and thus minimize women we consider F&A to be the reference.

In M&S it is 1 in favour of women. Notice that this is the only ratio resulting in more women than men in any department. So, to maximize the number of women, it is the only option.

Hope this helps!


TradingJackets
ThatDudeKnows

Bunuel
A software company named Hardsoft has three divisions, each staffed by at least 10 people. The ratio of men to women is 7:5 in Finance and Administration, 3:4 in Marketing and Sales and 8:7 in Research and Development. If there are 100 men working in Hardsoft and every Hardsoft employee works for one of the three divisions, then the difference between the maximum and minimum possible number of women working in Hardsoft is

(A) 39
(B) 40
(C) 41
(D) 42
(E) more than 42


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions

Longer than two minutes, but if I get a question like this on an actual exam, I'm pretty sure I'll be at 50 or 51 Quant!

Maximizing the number of women looks like it'll be driven primarily by having as many people as possible in Marketing/Sales. The number of men in Marketing/Sales will be a multiple of 3 and it can't be larger than 85, since we still need to place at least 7 men in Finance/Administration and 8 men in Research/Development.
Could it be 84? Nope; there would be no way to add some multiple of 7 and some multiple of 8 and arrive at 100.
Could it be 81? Nope.
Could it be 78? Yep, we could add 7+7+8 and get to 100.
In this configuration, we have 26 "sets" of Marketing/Sales, 2 "sets" of Finance/Administration, and 1 "set" of Research/Development.
That's 26(4)+2(5)+1(7) = 121 women

Minimizing the number of women is the opposite. We want Marketing/Sales to be as small as possible and Finance/Administration to be as large as possible. The number of men in Finance/Administration will be a multiple of 7 and it can't be larger than 86, since we still need to place at least 8 men in Finance/Administration and 6 men in Marketing/Sales.
Could it be 84? Nope; there would be no way to add some multiple of 8 and some multiple of 3 (that is at least 6) and arrive at 100.
Could it be 77? Nope.
Could it be 70? Yep, we could add 8+8+8+3+3 and get to 100.
In this configuration, we have 2 "sets" of Marketing/Sales, 10 "sets" of Finance/Administration, and 3 "sets" of Research/Development.
That's 2(4)+10(5)+3(7) = 79 women

121-79 = 42

Answer choice D.
­Could you please explain why "Maximizing the number of women looks like it'll be driven primarily by having as many people as possible in Marketing/Sales.", similarily why "Minimizing the number of women is the opposite. We want Marketing/Sales to be as small as possible and Finance/Administration to be as large as possible."Many thanks.
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 6,836
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,836
Kudos: 16,351
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Poor question. I suggest candidates stay away from such poorly worded question.
Bunuel
A software company named Hardsoft has three divisions, each staffed by at least 10 people. The ratio of men to women is 7:5 in Finance and Administration, 3:4 in Marketing and Sales and 8:7 in Research and Development. If there are 100 men working in Hardsoft and every Hardsoft employee works for one of the three divisions, then the difference between the maximum and minimum possible number of women working in Hardsoft is

(A) 39
(B) 40
(C) 41
(D) 42
(E) more than 42


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
Tuck School Moderator
805 posts